• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比增强乳腺钼靶摄影在血性乳头溢液评估中的应用——一项亚洲人群的多中心研究

The Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in the Evaluation of Bloody Nipple Discharge-A Multicenter Study in the Asian Population.

作者信息

Ong Ann-Hui Jamie, Goh Yonggeng, Quek Swee Tian, Pillay Premilla Gopinathan, Lee Herng-Sheng, Chou Chen-Pin

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Singapore.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kaoshiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaoshiung 813, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 16;14(20):2297. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202297.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14202297
PMID:39451620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11507279/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in Asian patients with bloody nipple discharge (BND).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 58 women with BND (mean age: 51.7 years) who underwent standardized CEM at institutions in Taiwan and Singapore. Lesion characteristics (size, enhancement, conspicuity, shape, margins) were evaluated on CEM by blinded radiologists. Non-enhanced mammography (MMG) and ultrasound (US) within a defined timeframe were compared for diagnostic accuracy. Benign or malignant status was confirmed by biopsy or 2-year imaging follow-up.

RESULTS

Malignancy was found in 29 of 58 lesions (50.0%), with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) being the most common. CEM demonstrated a 100% negative predictive value (NPV) for non-enhancing lesions. Significant predictors of malignancy on multivariate analysis include enhancing lesions of size ≥ 1.5 cm (-value 0.025) and suspicious morphological features (irregular/spiculated margins, irregular shape, segmental/linear NME distribution) (-value < 0.001). CEM outperformed MMG (sensitivity: 58.6%) and US (sensitivity: 79.3%), achieving a sensitivity of 100% and the highest diagnostic accuracy at 81.3%. Additionally, a CEM size cut-off of 1.5 cm yielded a sensitivity of 73.5% and a specificity of 84.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

CEM effectively differentiates benign from malignant lesions in patients with BND, improving diagnostic accuracy and potentially reducing unnecessary interventions.

摘要

目的

评估对比增强乳腺钼靶摄影(CEM)在鉴别亚洲血性乳头溢液(BND)患者乳腺良恶性病变中的疗效。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了58例BND患者(平均年龄:51.7岁),这些患者在台湾和新加坡的机构接受了标准化CEM检查。由不知情的放射科医生在CEM上评估病变特征(大小、强化、清晰度、形状、边缘)。比较在规定时间内的非增强乳腺钼靶摄影(MMG)和超声(US)的诊断准确性。通过活检或2年的影像随访确定良性或恶性状态。

结果

58个病变中有29个(50.0%)为恶性,其中原位导管癌(DCIS)最为常见。CEM对无强化病变的阴性预测值(NPV)为100%。多因素分析中,恶性的显著预测因素包括大小≥1.5 cm的强化病变(P值0.025)和可疑的形态学特征(边缘不规则/毛刺状、形状不规则、节段性/线性非肿块强化分布)(P值<0.001)。CEM的表现优于MMG(敏感性:58.6%)和US(敏感性:79.3%),敏感性达到100%,诊断准确性最高,为81.3%。此外,CEM大小截断值为1.5 cm时,敏感性为73.5%,特异性为84.3%。

结论

CEM能有效鉴别BND患者的乳腺良恶性病变,提高诊断准确性,并可能减少不必要的干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11507279/94de1f15567e/diagnostics-14-02297-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11507279/1da826c6d878/diagnostics-14-02297-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11507279/3ba5d3f14297/diagnostics-14-02297-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11507279/c093da8e6668/diagnostics-14-02297-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11507279/94de1f15567e/diagnostics-14-02297-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11507279/1da826c6d878/diagnostics-14-02297-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11507279/3ba5d3f14297/diagnostics-14-02297-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11507279/c093da8e6668/diagnostics-14-02297-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe6b/11507279/94de1f15567e/diagnostics-14-02297-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in the Evaluation of Bloody Nipple Discharge-A Multicenter Study in the Asian Population.对比增强乳腺钼靶摄影在血性乳头溢液评估中的应用——一项亚洲人群的多中心研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 16;14(20):2297. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202297.
2
Breast masses with rim enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: morphological and enhancement features for diagnosis and differentiation of benign and malignant.乳腺肿块在增强型乳腺钼靶摄影中呈环形强化:形态学和强化特征用于诊断和鉴别良恶性。
Br J Radiol. 2024 May 7;97(1157):1016-1021. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae064.
3
Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.超声造影增强数字钼靶检查对良恶性病变的预测价值
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Sep;217(3):595-604. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24368. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
4
Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.低剂量对比增强乳腺 X 光摄影与对比增强乳腺 MRI 对比:一项可行性研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Aug;52(2):589-595. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27079. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
Contrast-enhanced mammography for the assessment of screening recalls: a two-centre study.对比增强乳腺摄影在筛查召回评估中的应用:一项两中心研究。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Nov;32(11):7388-7399. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08868-3. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
6
Persistent post-galactogram intraductal iodinated contrast detected on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in a patient with nipple discharge.在一名乳头溢液患者的对比增强乳腺钼靶检查(CEM)中检测到造影后持续存在的导管内碘化造影剂。
Radiol Case Rep. 2022 Feb 3;17(4):1099-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.01.040. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Utility of MRI-Directed Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Biopsy Planning for Suspicious MRI-Detected Breast Lesions.MRI 引导对比增强乳腺摄影在可疑 MRI 检出乳腺病变活检规划中的应用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Feb;220(2):202-211. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.28055. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
8
The Rightful Role of MRI after Negative Conventional Imaging in the Management of Bloody Nipple Discharge.常规成像阴性后MRI在血性乳头溢液管理中的合理作用
Breast J. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):209-12. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12551. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
9
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a case series.对比增强超声引导下对比增强乳腺摄影和对比增强 MRI 可疑乳腺病变活检:病例系列。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2023 Oct;50(4):521-529. doi: 10.1007/s10396-023-01345-4. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
10
Role of contrast-enhanced mammogram as an adjunct to tomosynthesis in evaluation of circumscribed breast lesions.对比增强乳腺 X 线摄影在评估局限性乳腺病变中的作用。
Br J Radiol. 2024 Oct 1;97(1162):1696-1705. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae130.

引用本文的文献

1
An update on multimodal imaging strategies for nipple discharge: from detection to decision.乳头溢液多模态成像策略的最新进展:从检测到决策
Insights Imaging. 2025 Mar 24;16(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-01947-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Nipple Discharge.乳头溢液的处理。
Surg Clin North Am. 2022 Dec;102(6):1077-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2022.06.006.
2
Nipple Discharge: Current Clinical and Imaging Evaluation.乳头溢液:当前的临床与影像评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Feb;216(2):330-339. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22025. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.低剂量对比增强乳腺 X 光摄影与对比增强乳腺 MRI 对比:一项可行性研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Aug;52(2):589-595. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27079. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
4
Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.MRI、分子乳腺成像和对比增强乳腺摄影在新诊断乳腺癌女性中的诊断性能。
Radiology. 2019 Dec;293(3):531-540. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190887. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
5
Correlation between quantitative assessment of contrast enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and histopathology-preliminary results.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术(CESM)中对比增强定量评估与组织病理学的相关性——初步结果。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):6220-6226. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06232-6. Epub 2019 May 14.
6
Implications of nipple discharge in Hong Kong Chinese women.香港中国女性乳头溢液的影响
Hong Kong Med J. 2018 Feb;24(1):18-24. doi: 10.12809/hkmj154764. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
7
New diagnostic tools for breast cancer.乳腺癌的新型诊断工具。
Memo. 2017;10(3):175-180. doi: 10.1007/s12254-017-0341-5. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
8
Diagnostic Performance of MRI Versus Galactography in Women With Pathologic Nipple Discharge: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.MRI 与乳管造影术对病理性乳头溢液女性的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug;209(2):465-471. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16682. Epub 2017 May 24.
9
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术与乳腺摄影术和磁共振成像的多阅片者评估中的临床性能
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):2752-2764. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4650-6. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
10
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影(CESM)与乳腺磁共振成像(MRI):66例乳腺病变的回顾性比较
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 Feb;98(2):113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Sep 26.