• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估贝叶斯网络结构学习中的可信度。

Assessing Credibility in Bayesian Networks Structure Learning.

作者信息

Barth Vitor, Serrão Fábio, Maciel Carlos

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Computing Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, SP, Brazil.

Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-905, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;26(10):829. doi: 10.3390/e26100829.

DOI:10.3390/e26100829
PMID:39451908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11507489/
Abstract

Learning Bayesian networks from data aims to create a Directed Acyclic Graph that encodes significant statistical relationships between variables and their joint probability distributions. However, when using real-world data with limited knowledge of the original dynamical system, it is challenging to determine if the learned DAG accurately reflects the underlying relationships, especially when the data come from multiple independent sources. This paper describes a methodology capable of assessing the credible interval for the existence and direction of each edge within Bayesian networks learned from data, without previous knowledge of the underlying dynamical system. It offers several advantages over classical methods, such as data fusion from multiple sources, identification of latent variables, and extraction of the most prominent edges with their respective credible interval. The method is evaluated using simulated datasets of various sizes and a real use case. Our approach was verified to achieve results comparable to the most recent studies in the field, while providing more information on the model's credibility.

摘要

从数据中学习贝叶斯网络旨在创建一个有向无环图,该图对变量及其联合概率分布之间的重要统计关系进行编码。然而,当使用对原始动态系统了解有限的现实世界数据时,很难确定学习到的有向无环图是否准确反映了潜在关系,尤其是当数据来自多个独立来源时。本文描述了一种方法,该方法能够在无需了解潜在动态系统的先验知识的情况下,评估从数据中学习到的贝叶斯网络中每条边的存在和方向的可信区间。与经典方法相比,它具有多个优势,例如多源数据融合、潜在变量识别以及提取具有各自可信区间的最显著边。该方法使用各种大小的模拟数据集和一个实际用例进行了评估。我们的方法经过验证,能够取得与该领域最新研究相当的结果,同时提供有关模型可信度的更多信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/fbc78723a51a/entropy-26-00829-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/ec537e32f80a/entropy-26-00829-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/20250aaedf88/entropy-26-00829-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/49aff75237fe/entropy-26-00829-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/8e7d0ab6f043/entropy-26-00829-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/9b40453c99c9/entropy-26-00829-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/113d8ca98c67/entropy-26-00829-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/fbc78723a51a/entropy-26-00829-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/ec537e32f80a/entropy-26-00829-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/20250aaedf88/entropy-26-00829-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/49aff75237fe/entropy-26-00829-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/8e7d0ab6f043/entropy-26-00829-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/9b40453c99c9/entropy-26-00829-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/113d8ca98c67/entropy-26-00829-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/11507489/fbc78723a51a/entropy-26-00829-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Credibility in Bayesian Networks Structure Learning.评估贝叶斯网络结构学习中的可信度。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;26(10):829. doi: 10.3390/e26100829.
2
Probabilistic edge inference of gene networks with markov random field-based bayesian learning.基于马尔可夫随机场贝叶斯学习的基因网络概率边推断
Front Genet. 2022 Nov 10;13:1034946. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1034946. eCollection 2022.
3
Causal Artificial Intelligence Models of Food Quality Data.食品质量数据的因果人工智能模型。
Food Technol Biotechnol. 2024 Mar;62(1):102-109. doi: 10.17113/ftb.62.01.24.8301.
4
Distributed Bayesian networks reconstruction on the whole genome scale.全基因组规模上的分布式贝叶斯网络重建
PeerJ. 2018 Oct 19;6:e5692. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5692. eCollection 2018.
5
A tutorial on bayesian networks for psychopathology researchers.贝叶斯网络在精神病理学研究中的应用教程。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Aug;28(4):947-961. doi: 10.1037/met0000479. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
H-CORE: enabling genome-scale Bayesian analysis of biological systems without prior knowledge.H-CORE:无需先验知识即可实现生物系统的全基因组规模贝叶斯分析。
Biosystems. 2007 Jul-Aug;90(1):197-210. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
7
A method for integrating expert knowledge when learning Bayesian networks from data.一种在从数据学习贝叶斯网络时整合专家知识的方法。
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2011 Oct;41(5):1382-94. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2011.2148197. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
8
Structural factor equation models for causal network construction via directed acyclic mixed graphs.基于有向无环混合图的因果网络构建的结构因子方程模型。
Biometrics. 2021 Jun;77(2):573-586. doi: 10.1111/biom.13322. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
9
Mining causal relationships among clinical variables for cancer diagnosis based on Bayesian analysis.基于贝叶斯分析的癌症诊断临床变量因果关系挖掘。
BioData Min. 2015 Apr 16;8:13. doi: 10.1186/s13040-015-0046-4. eCollection 2015.
10
Bayesian Network Structure Learning Method Based on Causal Direction Graph for Protein Signaling Networks.基于因果方向图的蛋白质信号网络贝叶斯网络结构学习方法
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Sep 24;24(10):1351. doi: 10.3390/e24101351.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of a novel hybrid algorithm of Bayesian network in the study of hyperlipidemia related factors: a cross-sectional study.贝叶斯网络混合算法在高脂血症相关因素研究中的应用:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 12;21(1):1375. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11412-5.
2
How to improve the muscle synergy analysis methodology?如何改进肌肉协同分析方法?
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Apr;121(4):1009-1025. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04604-9. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
3
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.
人工智能在医疗保健中的可解释性:多学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
4
Surface Electromyography Applied to Gait Analysis: How to Improve Its Impact in Clinics?应用于步态分析的表面肌电图:如何提高其在临床中的影响力?
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 4;11:994. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00994. eCollection 2020.
5
Explainable artificial intelligence model to predict acute critical illness from electronic health records.基于电子病历预测急性危重症的可解释人工智能模型。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 31;11(1):3852. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17431-x.
6
Changes in Muscle Activity Patterns and Joint Kinematics During Gait in Hemophilic Arthropathy.血友病性关节病患者步态期间肌肉活动模式和关节运动学的变化
Front Physiol. 2020 Jan 31;10:1575. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01575. eCollection 2019.
7
The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare.人工智能在医疗保健领域的潜力。
Future Healthc J. 2019 Jun;6(2):94-98. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94.
8
Review of Causal Discovery Methods Based on Graphical Models.基于图形模型的因果发现方法综述
Front Genet. 2019 Jun 4;10:524. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00524. eCollection 2019.
9
Detection of movement onset using EMG signals for upper-limb exoskeletons in reaching tasks.使用肌电信号检测上肢外骨骼在伸展任务中的运动起始。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Mar 29;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0512-1.
10
The Neuromuscular Origins of Kinematic Variability during Perturbed Walking.运动扰动下运动变异性的神经肌肉起源。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 11;7(1):808. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00942-x.