Suppr超能文献

生前临床诊断与最终尸检诊断的比较:来自南非比勒陀利亚一个学术中心的经验

Comparison of Ante-Mortem Clinical Diagnosis and Final Autopsy Diagnosis: Experience from a Single Academic Centre in Pretoria, South Africa.

作者信息

Nevondo Lesedi Makgwethele, Kekana Tebatso, Maaga Khomotso Comfort, Khaba Moshawa Calvin

机构信息

Department of Anatomical Pathology, Dr George Mukhari Tertiary Laboratory, National Health Laboratory Service, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa 0208, South Africa.

Department of Public Health, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa 0208, South Africa.

出版信息

Diseases. 2024 Sep 27;12(10):229. doi: 10.3390/diseases12100229.

Abstract

: There seems to be a global reduction in the number of clinical post-mortems requested and performed worldwide, suggesting a decreasing need for post-mortem examinations. Despite advances in medical technology, autopsies remain a relevant tool to determine cause of death. : A total of 276 post-mortem results were extracted from the NHLS lab track database, of which only 152 were included in this study. Discrepancies between ante and post-mortem diagnoses were evaluated using the Goldman classification. Data were analysed using STATA-18. : The sample consisted largely of females ( = 101, 66.45%) aged 30 and above ( = 58, 33.80%), with a mean age of 28.3. Of the 152 samples analysed, 60% ( = 92) of all postmortems showed a correlation between ante- and post-mortem diagnoses. However, 29.1% ( = 45) of cases showed major discrepancies which could have been prevented if correct diagnoses were made. Metabolic diseases were most frequently misdiagnosed ( = 0.020), with more cases of Class I discrepancies than Class V discrepancies (15.5% ( = 7) vs. 2.1% ( = 2), respectively. Additionally, infections ( = 59; 39%) were the most common cause of death. : Even with marked improvements in diagnostic technology, a post-mortem examination is a necessary quality control tool that can be used to verify cause of death, and thus improve clinical practice.

摘要

全球范围内,临床尸检申请数量和实际进行的尸检数量似乎都在减少,这表明对尸检的需求在下降。尽管医疗技术有所进步,但尸检仍是确定死因的重要工具。:从NHLS实验室跟踪数据库中提取了276份尸检结果,其中本研究仅纳入了152份。使用戈德曼分类法评估生前诊断和死后诊断之间的差异。数据使用STATA - 18进行分析。:样本主要由30岁及以上的女性组成(n = 101,66.45%),平均年龄为28.3岁。在分析的152个样本中,所有尸检中有60%(n = 92)显示生前诊断和死后诊断之间存在相关性。然而,29.1%(n = 45)的病例存在重大差异,如果做出正确诊断,这些差异本可避免。代谢性疾病最常被误诊(p = 0.020),I类差异的病例比V类差异的病例更多(分别为15.5%(n = 7)和2.1%(n = 2))。此外,感染(n = 59;39%)是最常见的死因。:即使诊断技术有了显著改进,尸检仍是一种必要的质量控制工具,可用于核实死因,从而改善临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dec4/11506692/910dab1f541c/diseases-12-00229-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验