Kuruc Roman, Szórádová Andrea, Šikuta Ján, Mikuláš Ľubomír, Šidlo Jozef
Institute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Sasinkova 4, 81108 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Medico-Legal Department, Health Care Surveillance Authority, Antolská 11, 85107 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 4;10(8):1465. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081465.
Traumatic injuries are one of the severe health problems of our time. In the 21st Century, approximately 4.5 million people worldwide die each year due to trauma. Computed tomography (CT) is widely used to diagnose injuries and offers information on the specific location and extent of organ and tissue damage. In cases of severe trauma, whole-body CT is increasingly used as a standard diagnostic technique. An autopsy is the final diagnostic examination and is still considered the gold standard in diagnostic methods in medicine. The aim of the study was to assess the reliability and accuracy of CT scan results, as well as limits in detecting trauma for forensic purposes. It aims to compare traumatic findings in the antemortem CT results to those observed at autopsy. We conducted a retrospective-prospective study involving 510 deaths due to trauma. We compared selected traumatic changes in the antemortem CT scan results with the autopsy findings. We obtained data with a detailed analysis of autopsy protocols, photographic documentation from the autopsies, and the interpretation of CT scans from medical documentation. In cases of discrepancies in the findings, we borrowed CT scans, which were repeatedly reviewed by clinical radiologists. By comparing the findings of selected injuries detected by antemortem CT and autopsy, we found a correlation of findings in 75.3% and a discrepancy of findings in 24.7% in a set of 510 cases. After repeated targeted assessment of CT images by clinical radiologists in cases of discrepancies in the findings, which were detected by autopsy and undescribed by CT, the discrepancy decreased to 17%. The results of the study are comparable with data from many studies and professional publications. They show that CT compared to autopsy is a good method for diagnosing gunshot wounds to the head and bone fractures, with a limited diagnosis of cranial base fractures, while an autopsy is better for detecting minor injuries to organs and soft tissues.
创伤性损伤是我们这个时代严重的健康问题之一。在21世纪,全球每年约有450万人死于创伤。计算机断层扫描(CT)被广泛用于诊断损伤,并能提供有关器官和组织损伤的具体位置和程度的信息。在严重创伤的情况下,全身CT越来越多地被用作标准诊断技术。尸检是最后的诊断检查,至今仍被视为医学诊断方法中的金标准。本研究的目的是评估CT扫描结果的可靠性和准确性,以及法医诊断创伤时的检测限度。其旨在将生前CT结果中的创伤性发现与尸检时观察到的结果进行比较。我们进行了一项回顾性-前瞻性研究,涉及510例创伤死亡病例。我们将生前CT扫描结果中选定的创伤性变化与尸检结果进行了比较。我们通过详细分析尸检报告、尸检的照片记录以及医学文档中的CT扫描解读来获取数据。在结果存在差异的情况下,我们借阅了CT扫描片,由临床放射科医生进行反复审查。通过比较生前CT和尸检检测到的选定损伤的结果,我们发现在510例病例中,结果的相关性为75.3%,差异为24.7%。在尸检发现但CT未描述的结果存在差异的情况下,经临床放射科医生对CT图像进行反复针对性评估后,差异降至17%。该研究结果与许多研究和专业出版物的数据具有可比性。结果表明,与尸检相比,CT是诊断头部枪伤和骨折的好方法,对颅底骨折的诊断有限,而尸检在检测器官和软组织的轻微损伤方面更具优势。