Graduate Program in Health Science, Federal University of Sergipe, Research Center in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL), Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Health Science, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2023 Jun-Dec;46(5-9):327-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.08.007. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
The pressure pain threshold is commonly employed to assess pain in various conditions. Despite its widespread use, the measurement of pressure pain thresholds is not consistently described across studies. Therefore, this review aimed to systematically examine the evidence regarding the assessment of pressure pain thresholds in patients with low back pain, including the protocols and body sites employed.
Six databases were systematically screened from their earliest records to May 2023 to identify studies utilizing pressure pain thresholds. Eligibility screening was conducted for the identified studies, and the included studies underwent appraisal using the appropriate tool corresponding to their study design.
Upon categorizing based on the type of pain, we included 5 studies involving acute low back pain and 43 studies with chronic pain. The meta-analysis was conducted to compare subjects with and without pain, revealing no significant difference for the paraspinal region (SMD = -4.19, 95%CI = -11.7 to 3.32, z = -1.09, p = .27), piriformis (SMD = -1.24, 95%CI = -4.25 to 1.76, z = -0.81, p = .42) and quadratus lumborum musculature (SMD = -0.37, 95%CI = -1.35 to 0.60, z = -0.75, p = .45).
The paraspinal and gluteal musculature are the most frequently evaluated. Concerning the protocols for assessment, no consensus was identified. However, studies that assessed chronic low back pain typically adhered to a similar approach regarding the number of measures and a constant increase in pressure.
压力疼痛阈值常用于评估各种情况下的疼痛。尽管其应用广泛,但在研究中对压力疼痛阈值的测量方法并不一致。因此,本综述旨在系统地检查关于评估腰痛患者压力疼痛阈值的证据,包括所使用的方案和身体部位。
从最早记录到 2023 年 5 月,系统地对六个数据库进行筛选,以确定使用压力疼痛阈值的研究。对确定的研究进行资格筛选,并使用相应的研究设计工具对纳入的研究进行评估。
根据疼痛类型进行分类,我们纳入了 5 项涉及急性腰痛的研究和 43 项慢性疼痛研究。对有和无疼痛的受试者进行了荟萃分析,发现腰背肌(SMD = -4.19,95%CI = -11.7 至 3.32,z = -1.09,p =.27)、梨状肌(SMD = -1.24,95%CI = -4.25 至 1.76,z = -0.81,p =.42)和竖脊肌(SMD = -0.37,95%CI = -1.35 至 0.60,z = -0.75,p =.45)的压力疼痛阈值没有显著差异。
腰背肌和臀肌是最常评估的部位。关于评估方案,没有达成共识。然而,评估慢性腰痛的研究通常采用类似的方法,即测量次数和压力的恒定增加。