Suppr超能文献

《应用压力测痛仪评估腰痛患者的压力疼痛阈值:系统评价与荟萃分析》

Pressure Pain Threshold Protocols With Pressure Algometer in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Health Science, Federal University of Sergipe, Research Center in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL), Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.

Graduate Program in Health Science, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2023 Jun-Dec;46(5-9):327-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.08.007. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The pressure pain threshold is commonly employed to assess pain in various conditions. Despite its widespread use, the measurement of pressure pain thresholds is not consistently described across studies. Therefore, this review aimed to systematically examine the evidence regarding the assessment of pressure pain thresholds in patients with low back pain, including the protocols and body sites employed.

METHODS

Six databases were systematically screened from their earliest records to May 2023 to identify studies utilizing pressure pain thresholds. Eligibility screening was conducted for the identified studies, and the included studies underwent appraisal using the appropriate tool corresponding to their study design.

RESULTS

Upon categorizing based on the type of pain, we included 5 studies involving acute low back pain and 43 studies with chronic pain. The meta-analysis was conducted to compare subjects with and without pain, revealing no significant difference for the paraspinal region (SMD = -4.19, 95%CI = -11.7 to 3.32, z = -1.09, p = .27), piriformis (SMD = -1.24, 95%CI = -4.25 to 1.76, z = -0.81, p = .42) and quadratus lumborum musculature (SMD = -0.37, 95%CI = -1.35 to 0.60, z = -0.75, p = .45).

CONCLUSION

The paraspinal and gluteal musculature are the most frequently evaluated. Concerning the protocols for assessment, no consensus was identified. However, studies that assessed chronic low back pain typically adhered to a similar approach regarding the number of measures and a constant increase in pressure.

摘要

目的

压力疼痛阈值常用于评估各种情况下的疼痛。尽管其应用广泛,但在研究中对压力疼痛阈值的测量方法并不一致。因此,本综述旨在系统地检查关于评估腰痛患者压力疼痛阈值的证据,包括所使用的方案和身体部位。

方法

从最早记录到 2023 年 5 月,系统地对六个数据库进行筛选,以确定使用压力疼痛阈值的研究。对确定的研究进行资格筛选,并使用相应的研究设计工具对纳入的研究进行评估。

结果

根据疼痛类型进行分类,我们纳入了 5 项涉及急性腰痛的研究和 43 项慢性疼痛研究。对有和无疼痛的受试者进行了荟萃分析,发现腰背肌(SMD = -4.19,95%CI = -11.7 至 3.32,z = -1.09,p =.27)、梨状肌(SMD = -1.24,95%CI = -4.25 至 1.76,z = -0.81,p =.42)和竖脊肌(SMD = -0.37,95%CI = -1.35 至 0.60,z = -0.75,p =.45)的压力疼痛阈值没有显著差异。

结论

腰背肌和臀肌是最常评估的部位。关于评估方案,没有达成共识。然而,评估慢性腰痛的研究通常采用类似的方法,即测量次数和压力的恒定增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验