• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Primary healthcare professionals' perceptions, attitudes and ideas regarding asthma management in Greece: A mixed-method study.希腊初级保健专业人员对哮喘管理的看法、态度和想法:一项混合方法研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2418301. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2418301. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Enhancing medication management of older adults in Qatar: healthcare professionals' perspectives on challenges, barriers and enabling solutions.加强卡塔尔老年人的药物管理:医疗保健专业人员对挑战、障碍及可行解决方案的看法。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Oct 7;15:20420986241272846. doi: 10.1177/20420986241272846. eCollection 2024.
3
Health professional perspectives on the management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy for older patients in Australia.澳大利亚医疗专业人员对老年患者多重疾病和多重用药管理的看法。
Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):291-299. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw200.
4
Health care professionals' views towards self-management and self-management education for people with type 2 diabetes.医护人员对 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理和自我管理教育的看法。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e029961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029961.
5
Barriers to implementing asthma self-management in Malaysian primary care: qualitative study exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals.在马来西亚初级保健中实施哮喘自我管理的障碍:探索医疗保健专业人员观点的定性研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2021 Jul 7;31(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41533-021-00250-y.
6
Considering health literacy in cardiovascular disease management: a qualitative study on healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives.考虑到心血管疾病管理中的健康素养:一项关于医疗保健专业人员和患者观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):1121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08455-8.
7
Exploring the perspectives of clinical professionals and support staff on implementing supported self-management for asthma in UK general practice: an IMPART qualitative study.探索英国普通实践中实施支持性自我管理哮喘的临床专业人员和支持人员的观点:IMPART 定性研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Jul 18;27(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0041-y.
8
Caregivers' and healthcare professionals' perspective of barriers and facilitators to health service access for asthmatic children: a qualitative study.照顾者和医疗保健专业人员对哮喘儿童获得卫生服务的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Dec;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001066.
9
Poor communication may impair optimal asthma care: a qualitative study.沟通不畅可能会损害哮喘的最佳治疗效果:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2007 Feb;24(1):65-70. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml062. Epub 2006 Dec 7.
10
Factors influencing the implementation of medicine risk communications by healthcare professionals in clinical practice: A systematic review.影响医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中实施药物风险沟通的因素:系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Jan;19(1):28-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision making - a review of its evaluation, efficacy, and applicability in asthma.共同决策——对其在哮喘中的评估、疗效及适用性的综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 12;12:1639805. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1639805. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceptions, practices, and experiences of asthma patients and community pharmacists on short-acting beta-2 agonists inhaler use: A qualitative study.哮喘患者与社区药剂师对短效β2受体激动剂吸入器使用的认知、实践与体验:一项定性研究。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 4;18(1):2455065. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2455065. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
How to make Asthma Right Care 'easy' in primary care: learnings from the 2023 Asthma Right Care Summit.如何在初级医疗保健中让哮喘正确护理变得“轻松”:从2023年哮喘正确护理峰会上获得的经验教训。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024 Apr 26;34(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41533-024-00366-x.
2
Over-the-counter use of short-acting beta-2 agonists: a systematic review.短效β-2激动剂的非处方使用:一项系统评价
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Oct 9;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00627-z.
3
Asthma Prevalence and Phenotyping in the General Population: The LEAD (Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy) Study.普通人群中的哮喘患病率及表型分析:LEAD(肺、心、社会、身体)研究
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Apr 8;16:367-382. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S402326. eCollection 2023.
4
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of pharmacists regarding asthma management: a cross-sectional study in Egypt.埃及药剂师对哮喘管理的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 May 3;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00432-0.
5
Managing asthma in primary healthcare.在初级医疗保健中管理哮喘。
Minerva Med. 2021 Oct;112(5):582-604. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.21.07277-3.
6
Treatment strategies for asthma: reshaping the concept of asthma management.哮喘的治疗策略:重塑哮喘管理理念
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Aug 15;16:75. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00472-8. eCollection 2020.
7
Bringing asthma care into the twenty-first century.将哮喘护理带入 21 世纪。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020 Jun 5;30(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-0182-2.
8
Essential Role of Pharmacists in Asthma Care and Management.药剂师在哮喘护理与管理中的重要作用。
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Feb;34(1):149-162. doi: 10.1177/0897190020927274. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
Effective Asthma Management: Is It Time to Let the AIR out of SABA?有效的哮喘管理:是时候减少短效β2激动剂的使用了吗?
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 27;9(4):921. doi: 10.3390/jcm9040921.
10
Approaches to the assessment of severe asthma: barriers and strategies.重度哮喘评估方法:障碍与策略
J Asthma Allergy. 2019 Aug 23;12:235-251. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S178927. eCollection 2019.

希腊初级保健专业人员对哮喘管理的看法、态度和想法:一项混合方法研究。

Primary healthcare professionals' perceptions, attitudes and ideas regarding asthma management in Greece: A mixed-method study.

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.

Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2418301. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2418301. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1080/13814788.2024.2418301
PMID:39453405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11514407/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implementing asthma guideline recommendations is challenging and there is variation between countries, and different healthcare professionals (HCPs). The International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) has introduced the Asthma Right Care (ARC) programme implemented in 24 low, middle, and high countries, including Greece. It offers a promising approach drawn from social movements for health to improve asthma care by engaging HCPs in implementing guideline-based asthma care.

OBJECTIVES

To explore HCPs' perspectives on current provision of asthma care and their willingness to improve implementation of recommended guidelines using ARC programme tools in Greece.

METHODS

A mixed methods study conducted from September 2020 to April 2021. A convenience sample of 30 pharmacists, and 10 General Practitioners (GPs), responded to a questionnaire investigating perceptions, and attitudes, towards implementation of asthma guidelines. Then, a qualitative survey followed with semi-structured interviews to evaluate the feedback obtained from HCPs to assess the content, and applicability of the ARC tools. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A range of practical challenges in implementing guideline-recommended interventions, improving asthma control and management were described by all HCPs, including lack of time and education, high workload, patients' perceptions, and poor communication contributing to poor management and inadequate follow-up of people with asthma. However, most HCPs were willing to use ARC interventions to improve guideline implementation.

CONCLUSION

HCPs in Greece encounter challenges in implementing asthma guidelines; however, they can overcome these challenges by using ARC interventions and engagement tools to address barriers and implement efficient asthma management strategies.

摘要

背景

实施哮喘指南建议具有挑战性,并且国家之间和不同医疗保健专业人员(HCP)之间存在差异。国际初级保健呼吸组(IPCRG)已经在包括希腊在内的 24 个低、中、高收入国家实施了哮喘正确护理(ARC)计划。它提供了一种有前途的方法,借鉴了健康方面的社会运动,通过让 HCP 参与实施基于指南的哮喘护理来改善哮喘护理。

目的

探讨 HCP 对当前哮喘护理提供情况的看法,以及他们是否愿意使用 ARC 计划工具来改善希腊推荐指南的实施。

方法

一项混合方法研究,于 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月进行。便利抽样选择了 30 名药剂师和 10 名全科医生(GP),他们对一项调查实施哮喘指南的看法和态度的问卷做出了回应。然后,进行了一项定性调查,采用半结构式访谈评估 HCP 的反馈,以评估 ARC 工具的内容和适用性。使用主题分析对数据进行分析。

结果

所有 HCP 都描述了在实施指南推荐的干预措施、改善哮喘控制和管理方面存在的一系列实际挑战,包括缺乏时间和教育、工作量大、患者认知以及沟通不畅,这些都导致了对哮喘患者的管理不善和随访不足。然而,大多数 HCP 愿意使用 ARC 干预措施来改善指南的实施。

结论

希腊的 HCP 在实施哮喘指南方面面临挑战;然而,他们可以通过使用 ARC 干预措施和参与工具来克服这些挑战,以解决障碍并实施有效的哮喘管理策略。