Kaplan Alan, Mitchell Patrick D, Cave Andrew J, Gagnon Remi, Foran Vanessa, Ellis Anne K
Family Physician Airways Group of Canada, Edmonton T5X 4P8, Alberta, Canada.
Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N 1N4, Alberta, Canada.
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 27;9(4):921. doi: 10.3390/jcm9040921.
For years, standard asthma treatment has included short acting beta agonists (SABA), including as monotherapy in patients with mild asthma symptoms. In the Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 strategy for the management of asthma, the authors recommended a significant departure from the traditional treatments. Short acting beta agonists (SABAs) are no longer recommended as the preferred reliever for patients when they are symptomatic and should not be used at all as monotherapy because of significant safety concerns and poor outcomes. Instead, the more appropriate course is the use of a combined inhaled corticosteroid-fast acting beta agonist as a reliever. This paper discusses the issues associated with the use of SABA, the reasons that patients over-use SABA, difficulties that can be expected in overcoming SABA over-reliance in patients, and our evolving understanding of the use of "anti-inflammatory relievers" in our patients with asthma.
多年来,标准的哮喘治疗方法包括使用短效β受体激动剂(SABA),在症状较轻的哮喘患者中可作为单一疗法使用。在《2019年全球哮喘防治创议》的哮喘管理策略中,作者建议与传统治疗方法有重大偏离。短效β受体激动剂(SABA)不再被推荐为有症状患者的首选缓解药物,且由于存在重大安全问题和疗效不佳,不应再作为单一疗法使用。相反,更合适的做法是使用吸入性糖皮质激素与速效β受体激动剂联合制剂作为缓解药物。本文讨论了与使用SABA相关的问题、患者过度使用SABA的原因、在克服患者对SABA过度依赖方面可能遇到的困难,以及我们对哮喘患者使用“抗炎缓解药物”的不断演变的认识。