Suppr超能文献

有效的哮喘管理:是时候减少短效β2激动剂的使用了吗?

Effective Asthma Management: Is It Time to Let the AIR out of SABA?

作者信息

Kaplan Alan, Mitchell Patrick D, Cave Andrew J, Gagnon Remi, Foran Vanessa, Ellis Anne K

机构信息

Family Physician Airways Group of Canada, Edmonton T5X 4P8, Alberta, Canada.

Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N 1N4, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 27;9(4):921. doi: 10.3390/jcm9040921.

Abstract

For years, standard asthma treatment has included short acting beta agonists (SABA), including as monotherapy in patients with mild asthma symptoms. In the Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 strategy for the management of asthma, the authors recommended a significant departure from the traditional treatments. Short acting beta agonists (SABAs) are no longer recommended as the preferred reliever for patients when they are symptomatic and should not be used at all as monotherapy because of significant safety concerns and poor outcomes. Instead, the more appropriate course is the use of a combined inhaled corticosteroid-fast acting beta agonist as a reliever. This paper discusses the issues associated with the use of SABA, the reasons that patients over-use SABA, difficulties that can be expected in overcoming SABA over-reliance in patients, and our evolving understanding of the use of "anti-inflammatory relievers" in our patients with asthma.

摘要

多年来,标准的哮喘治疗方法包括使用短效β受体激动剂(SABA),在症状较轻的哮喘患者中可作为单一疗法使用。在《2019年全球哮喘防治创议》的哮喘管理策略中,作者建议与传统治疗方法有重大偏离。短效β受体激动剂(SABA)不再被推荐为有症状患者的首选缓解药物,且由于存在重大安全问题和疗效不佳,不应再作为单一疗法使用。相反,更合适的做法是使用吸入性糖皮质激素与速效β受体激动剂联合制剂作为缓解药物。本文讨论了与使用SABA相关的问题、患者过度使用SABA的原因、在克服患者对SABA过度依赖方面可能遇到的困难,以及我们对哮喘患者使用“抗炎缓解药物”的不断演变的认识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55bc/7230470/b0f828b42ea1/jcm-09-00921-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验