Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States.
Physiol Rev. 2025 Jan 1;105(1):95-135. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00003.2024. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
In 1996, we published a review article (Marder E, Calabrese RL. 76: 687-717, 1996) describing the state of knowledge about the structure and function of the central pattern-generating circuits important for producing rhythmic behaviors. Although many of the core questions persist, much has changed since 1996. Here, we focus on newer studies that reveal ambiguities that complicate understanding circuit dynamics, despite the enormous technical advances of the recent past. In particular, we highlight recent studies of animal-to-animal variability and our understanding that circuit rhythmicity may be supported by multiple state-dependent mechanisms within the same animal and that robustness and resilience in the face of perturbation may depend critically on the presence of modulators and degenerate circuit mechanisms. Additionally, we highlight the use of computational models to ask whether there are generalizable principles about circuit motifs that can be found across rhythmic motor systems in different animal species.
1996 年,我们发表了一篇综述文章(Marder E, Calabrese RL. 76: 687-717, 1996),描述了中央模式生成电路的结构和功能的知识状态,这些电路对于产生节律行为很重要。尽管许多核心问题仍然存在,但自 1996 年以来,情况已经发生了很大变化。在这里,我们关注的是最近的研究,这些研究揭示了尽管最近取得了巨大的技术进步,但仍使理解电路动力学变得复杂的模糊性。特别是,我们强调了最近关于动物间变异性的研究,以及我们的理解,即尽管在同一个动物中存在多种状态依赖的机制,但电路节律性可能得到支持,而且在面对干扰时的稳健性和弹性可能取决于调节剂和退化电路机制的存在。此外,我们还强调了使用计算模型来询问是否可以在不同动物物种的节律运动系统中找到关于电路基元的普遍适用的原则。