• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 PedAMINES 应用程序在减少儿科急诊用药错误方面的经济影响:成本效益分析。

Evaluating the Economic Impact of the PedAMINES App in Reducing Medication Errors in Pediatric Emergency Care: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 25;26:e52077. doi: 10.2196/52077.

DOI:10.2196/52077
PMID:39454199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11549577/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The administration of drugs in pediatric emergency care is a time-consuming process and is associated with a higher occurrence of medication errors compared with adult care. This is attributed to the intricacies of administration, which involve calculating doses based on the child's weight or age. To mitigate the occurrence of adverse drug events (ADEs), the PedAMINES (Pediatric Accurate Medication in Emergency Situations; Geneva University Hospitals) mobile app has been developed. This app offers a step-by-step guide for preparing and administering pediatric drugs during emergency interventions by automating the dose calculation process. Although previous simulation-based randomized controlled trials conducted in emergency care have demonstrated the efficacy of the PedAMINES app in reducing drug administration errors, there is a lack of evidence regarding its economic implications.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implementing the PedAMINES app for 4 emergency drugs: epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and midazolam.

METHODS

The economic evaluation was conducted by combining hospital data from 2019, previous trial outcomes, information extracted from existing literature, and PedAMINES maintenance costs. The cost per avoided medication error was calculated, along with the number of administrations needed to achieve a positive return on investment. Subsequently, Monte Carlo simulations were used to identify the key parameters contributing to result uncertainty.

RESULTS

The study revealed the number of preventable errors per administration for the 4 examined drugs: 0.513 for epinephrine, 0.484 for norepinephrine, 0.500 for dopamine, and 0.671 for midazolam. The cost-effectiveness ratios per ADE prevented were computed as follows: US $4808 for epinephrine, US $9705 for norepinephrine, US $6957 for dopamine, and US $2074 for midazolam. Accounting for the economic impact of ADEs, the analysis estimated that 16 administrations of epinephrine, 17 of norepinephrine and dopamine, and 13 of midazolam would be required to attain a positive return on investment. This corresponds to roughly one-third of the annual administrations at a major university hospital in Switzerland. The primary factors influencing the uncertainty in the estimated cost per ADE include the cost of maintenance of the app, the likelihood of an ADE resulting from an administration error, and the frequency of underdosing in the trial's control group.

CONCLUSIONS

A dedicated mobile app presents an economically viable solution to alleviate the health and economic burden of drug administration errors in in-hospital pediatric emergency care. The widespread adoption of this app is advocated to pool costs and extend the benefits on a national scale in Switzerland.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f17/11549577/2b33ca62ed97/jmir_v26i1e52077_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f17/11549577/c32c237218a5/jmir_v26i1e52077_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f17/11549577/ce16f87321e5/jmir_v26i1e52077_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f17/11549577/2b33ca62ed97/jmir_v26i1e52077_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f17/11549577/c32c237218a5/jmir_v26i1e52077_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f17/11549577/ce16f87321e5/jmir_v26i1e52077_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f17/11549577/2b33ca62ed97/jmir_v26i1e52077_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

在儿科急救护理中,药物管理是一个耗时的过程,与成人护理相比,更容易发生用药错误。这归因于给药的复杂性,包括根据儿童体重或年龄计算剂量。为了减少不良药物事件(ADE)的发生,开发了 PedAMINES(儿科紧急情况下准确用药;日内瓦大学医院)移动应用程序。该应用程序通过自动计算剂量,为急救干预期间准备和管理儿科药物提供了逐步指导。尽管之前在急救护理中进行的基于模拟的随机对照试验已经证明了 PedAMINES 应用程序在减少药物给药错误方面的有效性,但缺乏关于其经济影响的证据。

目的

本研究旨在评估为 4 种急救药物(肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素、多巴胺和咪达唑仑)实施 PedAMINES 应用程序的成本效益。

方法

经济评估结合了 2019 年的医院数据、先前试验结果、从现有文献中提取的信息和 PedAMINES 维护成本。计算了每避免一次用药错误的成本,以及实现投资回报所需的给药次数。随后,使用蒙特卡罗模拟确定导致结果不确定性的关键参数。

结果

研究揭示了 4 种检查药物每次给药可预防的错误数量:肾上腺素为 0.513,去甲肾上腺素为 0.484,多巴胺为 0.500,咪达唑仑为 0.671。每预防一次 ADE 的成本效益比计算如下:肾上腺素为 4808 美元,去甲肾上腺素为 9705 美元,多巴胺为 6957 美元,咪达唑仑为 2074 美元。考虑到 ADE 的经济影响,分析估计需要进行 16 次肾上腺素给药、17 次去甲肾上腺素和多巴胺给药以及 13 次咪达唑仑给药,才能实现投资回报。这相当于瑞士一家主要大学医院每年给药量的三分之一左右。影响估计的每例 ADE 成本不确定性的主要因素包括应用程序维护成本、给药错误导致 ADE 的可能性以及试验对照组中剂量不足的频率。

结论

专门的移动应用程序为减轻医院内儿科急救护理中药物给药错误的健康和经济负担提供了具有成本效益的解决方案。倡导广泛采用该应用程序,以在瑞士全国范围内分摊成本并扩大效益。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Economic Impact of the PedAMINES App in Reducing Medication Errors in Pediatric Emergency Care: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.评估 PedAMINES 应用程序在减少儿科急诊用药错误方面的经济影响:成本效益分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 25;26:e52077. doi: 10.2196/52077.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Melatonin versus midazolam in the premedication of anxious children attending for elective surgery under general anaesthesia: the MAGIC non-inferiority RCT.褪黑素与咪达唑仑用于择期全身麻醉手术患儿术前用药的比较:MAGIC非劣效性随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(29):1-25. doi: 10.3310/CWKF1987.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Drug management for acute tonic-clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children.儿童急性强直阵挛性惊厥(包括惊厥性癫痫持续状态)的药物管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 10;1(1):CD001905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001905.pub3.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Digital Health Technology Interventions for Improving Medication Safety: Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.用于提高用药安全性的数字健康技术干预措施:经济评估的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e65546. doi: 10.2196/65546.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
10
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds in Healthcare Public Policy: Progress and Challenges.医疗保健公共政策中使用成本效益阈值:进展与挑战。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Nov;22(6):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00900-5. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
2
Clinical and economic impact of medication administration errors among neonates in neonatal intensive care units.新生儿重症监护病房中新生儿用药错误的临床和经济影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0305538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305538. eCollection 2024.
3
Child Age and Risk of Medication Error: A Multisite Children's Hospital Study.
儿童年龄与用药错误风险:一项多地点儿童医院研究。
J Pediatr. 2024 Sep;272:114087. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114087. Epub 2024 May 3.
4
Medication Errors in Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Enhancing Medication Safety.儿科急诊中的用药错误:系统评价及增强用药安全性的建议。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Jan 1;40(1):58-67. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003108.
5
Prevalence, Causes and Severity of Medication Administration Errors in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新生儿重症监护病房用药错误的发生率、原因和严重程度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drug Saf. 2022 Dec;45(12):1457-1476. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01236-6. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
6
Pediatric Drug Safety Surveillance: A 10-Year Analysis of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Data in Calabria, Southern Italy.儿科药物安全监测:意大利南部卡拉布里亚地区 10 年药物不良反应报告数据分析。
Drug Saf. 2022 Nov;45(11):1381-1402. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01232-w. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
7
Interventions to reduce the incidence of medical error and its financial burden in health care systems: A systematic review of systematic reviews.降低医疗保健系统中医疗差错发生率及其经济负担的干预措施:系统评价的系统综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 27;9:875426. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.875426. eCollection 2022.
8
Cost-effectiveness of central automated unit dose dispensing with barcode-assisted medication administration in a hospital setting.集中式自动化单元剂量配发与条形码辅助用药管理在医院环境中的成本效益。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Nov;18(11):3980-3987. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
9
The impact of drug error reduction software on preventing harmful adverse drug events in England: a retrospective database study.药物错误减少软件对预防英格兰有害药物不良事件的影响:一项回顾性数据库研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Jul;11(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001708.
10
Characteristics and Consequences of Medication Errors in Pediatric Patients Reported to Ramathibodi Poison Center: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.向拉玛蒂博迪中毒中心报告的儿科患者用药错误的特征与后果:一项10年回顾性研究
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 Jun 30;18:669-681. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S363638. eCollection 2022.