• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴勒斯坦公共卫生应急准备的主要利益相关者观点:一项定性探索性研究。

Key stakeholders' perspectives of public health emergency preparedness in Palestine: A qualitative exploratory study.

机构信息

Al-Quds University, School of Public Health, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

出版信息

Public Health. 2024 Dec;237:232-237. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.013. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.013
PMID:39454233
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Palestine continues to face emergencies and a series of humanitarian crises. This study aims to comprehend emergency planning and response including the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Comprehending and recording these experiences will facilitate on-going improvement of Palestine's Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP).

STUDY DESIGN

A qualitative exploratory study.

METHODS

Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with key informant decision-makers representing various sectors of the Palestinian health system. The data collection period took place from April 2022-December 2022. A convenient purposive sample was chosen based on identifying important stakeholders in the West Bank's health sector. Every interview was transcribed. Major themes and subthemes were identified using content thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The study demonstrates Palestine's inadequate preparation for emergencies, instead there is a focus on response once a crisis has occurred. No national entity or mechanism is leading the collective preparedness efforts, which might ultimately result in a stronger emergency response. Instead, the efforts are dispersed across several entities, and decisions are not made cooperatively. As for resources, the study indicates that an emergency budget has not been allocated. The study showed a good degree of multi-sectoral collaboration with some reservations regarding the creation of various committees and their efficacy in handling crises.

CONCLUSION

The findings made it abundantly evident that significant efforts are needed to improve Palestine's level of preparedness and planning. One of the study's primary conclusions is that the health sector must shift from a reactionary to a preparedness-oriented mindset. Additionally, it is necessary to keep an eye on any changes in the nation's health and analysis must take place to strengthen the health system's response plans. Moreover, the activation of the emergency operation center in Palestine is one of the key advancements of the preparedness system.

摘要

目的

巴勒斯坦持续面临紧急情况和一系列人道主义危机。本研究旨在了解应急规划和应对措施,包括最近的 COVID-19 大流行。了解和记录这些经验将有助于不断改善巴勒斯坦公共卫生应急准备(PHEP)。

研究设计

定性探索性研究。

方法

对代表巴勒斯坦卫生系统各部门的 15 名关键信息决策者进行了半结构式访谈。数据收集期为 2022 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月。根据确定西岸卫生部门的重要利益相关者,选择了方便的目的性抽样。对每个访谈进行了转录。使用内容主题分析确定了主要主题和子主题。

结果

研究表明,巴勒斯坦对紧急情况的准备不足,而是侧重于危机发生后的应对。没有国家实体或机制主导集体准备工作,这可能最终导致更强的应急响应。相反,这些努力分散在几个实体中,决策不是合作做出的。至于资源,研究表明没有分配应急预算。研究表明,多部门合作程度较好,但对创建各种委员会及其在处理危机方面的效力存在一些保留意见。

结论

研究结果表明,需要做出重大努力来提高巴勒斯坦的准备水平和规划能力。研究的主要结论之一是,卫生部门必须从反应式思维转变为以准备为导向的思维。此外,有必要关注国家卫生状况的任何变化,并进行分析以加强卫生系统的应对计划。此外,巴勒斯坦应急行动中心的启用是准备系统的关键进步之一。

相似文献

1
Key stakeholders' perspectives of public health emergency preparedness in Palestine: A qualitative exploratory study.巴勒斯坦公共卫生应急准备的主要利益相关者观点:一项定性探索性研究。
Public Health. 2024 Dec;237:232-237. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.013. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Unveiling health disparities in Palestine: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives.揭示巴勒斯坦的健康差异:对利益相关者观点的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 16;24(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02449-8.
3
Responding to the covid-19 in west bank Palestine refugee camps: lessons and role of community engagement.应对巴勒斯坦西岸难民营中的新冠疫情:社区参与的经验教训及作用
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 20;25(1):1459. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22451-7.
4
Public health emergency preparedness for infectious disease emergencies: a scoping review of recent evidence.传染病疫情公共卫生应急准备:近期证据的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;23(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15313-7.
5
A consensus process on the use of exercises and after action reports to assess and improve public health emergency preparedness and response.运用演练和行动后报告评估和改进公共卫生应急准备和应对的共识过程。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Jun;28(3):305-8. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13000289. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
6
Information sharing across institutions: Practices and barriers during public health emergencies in Ethiopia.信息在机构间的共享:埃塞俄比亚公共卫生突发事件期间的实践和障碍。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jun;186:105439. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105439. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
7
The use of evidence to guide decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: divergent perspectives from a qualitative case study in British Columbia, Canada.利用证据在 COVID-19 大流行期间指导决策:来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的定性案例研究的不同观点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jun 3;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01146-2.
8
Public Health System Research in Public Health Emergency Preparedness in the United States (2009-2015): Actionable Knowledge Base.美国公共卫生应急准备中的公共卫生系统研究(2009 - 2015年):可操作知识库
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(S2):e1-e6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304051.
9
Preparedness and response against diseases with epidemic potential in the European Union: a qualitative case study of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and poliomyelitis in five member states.欧盟针对具有流行潜力疾病的防范与应对:对五个成员国中东呼吸综合征(MERS)和脊髓灰质炎的定性案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3326-0.
10
Rethinking Infection Control: Nursing Home Administrator Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic.重新思考感染控制:新冠疫情期间养老院管理者的经历。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Aug;25(8):105071. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105071. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
How to strengthen primary health care? An exploratory study on the policy of vertical integration of high-quality medical resources based on symbiosis theory.如何加强基层医疗保健?基于共生理论的优质医疗资源纵向整合政策的探索性研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1578712. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578712. eCollection 2025.