Brar Sumeet, Huang Qiwen, Yan Xiaowei, Dudum Ramzi, Jose Powell, Sarraju Ashish, Palaniappan Latha, Rodriguez Fatima
Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Center for Health Systems Research and Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar;40(4):756-763. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09126-6. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and clinical guidelines recommend incorporating Lp(a) testing in routine care.
Examine real-world, contemporary clinical testing patterns of Lp(a) among multiethnic populations.
In this nested case-control study, we assessed the prevalence and factors associated with Lp(a) testing within a large Northern Californian health system between 2010 and 2021. Incident density matching was used to select controls matched with a case for a case:control ratio of up to 1:5. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between Lp(a) testing, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics.
We included individuals aged 18 years or older with ≥ 2 primary care visits during the study period.
Lp(a) testing rates over time and factors associated with testing based on demographic, medical, and healthcare utilization variables.
Of the 1,484,410 individuals in the cohort, 14,818 (1.0%) underwent Lp(a) testing. The median Lp(a) level was 35 mg/dL and over a third of individuals had Lp(a) levels > 50 mg/dL. After adjustment, South Asian individuals were three times more likely to have undergone Lp(a) testing, as compared to non-Hispanic White individuals [OR = 3.19, (95% CI = 2.98, 3.41)], while those identified as non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic were significantly less likely to have undergone Lp(a) testing [OR = 0.70, (95% CI = 0.62, 0.80) and 0.64 (95% CI = 0.59, 0.69), respectively]. Those with a history of ASCVD had over twice the odds of undergoing testing [OR = 2.14 (95% CI = 1.99, 2.29)], as did individuals with more frequent primary care visits [OR = 1.99 (95% CI = 1.84, 2.15)].
Lp(a) testing rates in real-world settings are low, with significant disparities by race, ethnicity, and healthcare utilization. Expanding access to Lp(a) testing may help reduce disparities within ASCVD risk assessment and treatment as new targeted therapeutic agents become available.
脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]是动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的一个因果风险因素,临床指南建议将Lp(a)检测纳入常规医疗。
研究多民族人群中Lp(a)的真实世界当代临床检测模式。
在这项巢式病例对照研究中,我们评估了2010年至2021年期间北加利福尼亚州一个大型医疗系统内Lp(a)检测的患病率及相关因素。采用发病密度匹配法选择对照,病例与对照的比例最高为1:5。使用条件逻辑回归来评估Lp(a)检测、社会人口统计学和临床特征之间的关系。
我们纳入了在研究期间年龄≥18岁且有≥2次初级保健就诊的个体。
随时间变化的Lp(a)检测率,以及基于人口统计学、医学和医疗保健利用变量的检测相关因素。
在队列中的1,484,410名个体中,14,818名(1.0%)进行了Lp(a)检测。Lp(a)的中位数水平为35mg/dL,超过三分之一的个体Lp(a)水平>50mg/dL。调整后,与非西班牙裔白人个体相比,南亚个体进行Lp(a)检测的可能性高两倍[比值比(OR)=3.19,(95%置信区间(CI)=2.98,3.41)],而被认定为非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔的个体进行Lp(a)检测的可能性显著降低[OR分别为0.70,(95%CI=0.62,0.80)和0.64(95%CI=0.59,0.69)]。有ASCVD病史的个体接受检测的几率是其他人的两倍多[OR=2.14(95%CI=1.99,2.29)],初级保健就诊更频繁的个体也是如此[OR=1.99(95%CI=1.84,2.15)]。
在现实环境中,Lp(a)检测率较低,在种族、民族和医疗保健利用方面存在显著差异。随着新的靶向治疗药物的出现,扩大Lp(a)检测的可及性可能有助于减少ASCVD风险评估和治疗中的差异。