• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在需要机械通气的重症监护病房患者中使用环丙泊酚进行早期镇静:来自2期和3期试验数据的汇总事后分析。

Early sedation using ciprofol for intensive care unit patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a pooled post-hoc analysis of data from phase 2 and phase 3 trials.

作者信息

Liu Yongjun, Zuo Lingyun, Li Xiaoyun, Nie Yao, Chen Chuanxi, Liu Ning, Chen Minying, Wu Jianfeng, Guan Xiangdong

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

Guangdong Clinical Research Center for Critical Care Medicine, No. 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01390-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13613-024-01390-3
PMID:39455495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11511798/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ciprofol was approved for use in intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring sedation during mechanical ventilation in July 2022. A pooled post-hoc analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 trials was conducted primarily to explore hypotension-free outcome in ICU patients who required mechanical ventilation and achieved the target light sedation goal at an early stage after being sedated with ciprofol or propofol.

METHODS

All eligible ICU patients who were expected to require sedation for 6-24 h were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either a ciprofol or propofol group. Ciprofol or propofol was initially infused at loading doses of 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg followed by maintenance doses of 0.3 or 1.5 mg/kg/h. Ciprofol or propofol dosages were adjusted up or down at rates of 0.05-0.10 mg/kg/h or 0.25-0.50 mg/kg/h, respectively, to achieve the target light sedation (a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of -2 to + 1). The primary post-hoc outcome was the hypotension-free rate in patients who had achieved the target sedation goal after 30-min administration of ciprofol or propofol.

RESULTS

In total, 174 patients were enrolled for pooled post-hoc analysis, of whom 116 and 58 were assigned to the ciprofol and propofol groups, respectively. The hypotension-free rate was significantly higher in patients who achieved the target sedation goal after 30-min administration of ciprofol (93.0% vs. 81.0%, P = 0.018), and especially in the subgroups of males and patients aged < 65 years. Multivariable analysis revealed that ciprofol treatment, a younger age and lower baseline body mass index were independent favorable predictors for a higher hypotension-free rate in patients who achieved the target sedation goal after 30-min of drug administration. Moreover, hypotension-free patients who reached the target sedation level after 30 min had a more favorable short-term prognosis including a lower incidence of drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events, shorter time to extubation and fewer dose adjustments of ciprofol or propofol (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ICU patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and sedated with ciprofol had significantly lower rate of hypotension during the early phase of achieving light sedation during a 6-24 h period, leading to a more favorable short-term prognosis (within 24 h).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Phase 2 trial (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04147416. Registered November 1, 2019, https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT04147416 ) and phase 3 trial (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04620031. Registered November 6, 2020, https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT04620031 ).

摘要

背景

环泊酚于2022年7月被批准用于在机械通气期间需要镇静的重症监护病房(ICU)患者。进行了一项2期和3期试验的汇总事后分析,主要目的是探讨在使用环泊酚或丙泊酚镇静后早期达到目标轻度镇静目标的需要机械通气的ICU患者的无低血压结局。

方法

所有预计需要镇静6 - 24小时的符合条件的ICU患者按2:1的比例随机分配至环泊酚组或丙泊酚组。环泊酚或丙泊酚最初以0.5或1.0mg/kg的负荷剂量输注,随后以0.3或1.5mg/kg/h的维持剂量输注。环泊酚或丙泊酚剂量分别以0.05 - 0.10mg/kg/h或0.25 - 0.50mg/kg/h的速率上调或下调,以达到目标轻度镇静(里士满躁动 - 镇静量表为 -2至 +1)。主要事后结局是在给予环泊酚或丙泊酚30分钟后达到目标镇静目标的患者的无低血压率。

结果

总共174例患者被纳入汇总事后分析,其中116例和58例分别被分配至环泊酚组和丙泊酚组。在给予环泊酚30分钟后达到目标镇静目标的患者中,无低血压率显著更高(93.0%对81.0%,P = 0.018),尤其是在男性和年龄<65岁的患者亚组中。多变量分析显示,环泊酚治疗、年龄较小和基线体重指数较低是在给药30分钟后达到目标镇静目标的患者无低血压率较高的独立有利预测因素。此外,在30分钟后达到目标镇静水平的无低血压患者有更有利的短期预后,包括药物相关治疗突发不良事件的发生率较低、拔管时间较短以及环泊酚或丙泊酚的剂量调整较少(所有P < 0.05)。

结论

在6 - 24小时期间达到轻度镇静的早期阶段,接受环泊酚镇静的机械通气ICU患者的低血压发生率显著较低,导致更有利的短期预后(24小时内)。

试验注册

2期试验(clinicaltrials.gov,NCT04147416。2019年11月1日注册,https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT04147416 )和3期试验(clinicaltrials.gov,NCT04620031。2020年11月6日注册,https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT04620031 )。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ae7/11511798/88a1e3707733/13613_2024_1390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ae7/11511798/bd46a909679a/13613_2024_1390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ae7/11511798/88a1e3707733/13613_2024_1390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ae7/11511798/bd46a909679a/13613_2024_1390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ae7/11511798/88a1e3707733/13613_2024_1390_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Early sedation using ciprofol for intensive care unit patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a pooled post-hoc analysis of data from phase 2 and phase 3 trials.在需要机械通气的重症监护病房患者中使用环丙泊酚进行早期镇静:来自2期和3期试验数据的汇总事后分析。
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01390-3.
2
Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation: a multi-center, open label, randomized, phase 2 trial.西普福与异丙酚用于机械通气重症监护病房患者镇静的安全性和有效性:一项多中心、开放标签、随机、2 期临床试验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 May 5;135(9):1043-1051. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001912.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients with Mechanical Ventilation: A Clinical Trial Study Protocol.《Ciprofol 镇静在 ICU 机械通气患者中的疗效和安全性:一项临床试验研究方案》。
Adv Ther. 2021 Oct;38(10):5412-5423. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01877-6. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.西普罗福镇静在机械通气 ICU 患者中的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、单盲、随机、非劣效性试验。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Oct 1;51(10):1318-1327. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005920. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
5
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for long-term sedation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICUs: a prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled protocol.环丙泊酚用于重症监护病房接受机械通气患者长期镇静的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性、单中心、双盲、随机对照研究方案。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 21;14:1235709. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1235709. eCollection 2023.
6
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for sedation in outpatient gynecological procedures: a phase III multicenter randomized trial.环丙泊酚用于门诊妇科手术镇静的有效性和安全性:一项III期多中心随机试验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 23;11:1360508. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1360508. eCollection 2024.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for anesthetic induction and non-ICU sedation.一项比较环泊酚(HSK3486)与丙泊酚用于麻醉诱导和非重症监护病房镇静的疗效和安全性的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 25;14:1225288. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1225288. eCollection 2023.
8
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for the sedation/anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy: Phase IIa and IIb multi-center clinical trials.西普罗尔在结肠镜检查镇静/麻醉中的疗效和安全性:Ⅱa 期和Ⅱb 期多中心临床试验。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021 Sep 1;164:105904. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105904. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
9
Different sedation profiles with ciprofol compared to propofol represented by objective sedation level assessments by BIS and its acute hemodynamic impact in 3 escalated doses of ciprofol and propofol in healthy subjects: a single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-stage, 2-way crossover trial.与丙泊酚相比,依托咪酯具有不同的镇静特性,表现在 BIS 评估的客观镇静水平上,以及在健康受试者中以 3 种递增剂量给予依托咪酯和丙泊酚时的急性血液动力学影响:一项单中心、开放标签、随机、2 阶段、2 向交叉试验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Sep;27(17):7914-7923. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202309_33550.
10
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials.右美托咪定对比咪达唑仑或丙泊酚用于机械通气时间延长患者的镇静:两项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2012 Mar 21;307(11):1151-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.304.

引用本文的文献

1
Sedation in Critically Ill Children.危重症患儿的镇静
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 5;14(17):6273. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176273.
2
Ciprofol versus propofol for long-term sedation in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.环丙泊酚与丙泊酚用于脓毒症机械通气患者长期镇静的随机对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 9;25(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03042-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Light Sedation Increased the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Severe Lung Injury.早期轻度镇静增加了重症肺损伤患者机械通气的持续时间。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Oct 17;9:23779608231206761. doi: 10.1177/23779608231206761. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for anesthetic induction and non-ICU sedation.一项比较环泊酚(HSK3486)与丙泊酚用于麻醉诱导和非重症监护病房镇静的疗效和安全性的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 25;14:1225288. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1225288. eCollection 2023.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.
西普罗福镇静在机械通气 ICU 患者中的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、单盲、随机、非劣效性试验。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Oct 1;51(10):1318-1327. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005920. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
4
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol vs. propofol for the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia: A multicentre, single-blind, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial.西普罗 vs. 异丙酚用于全身麻醉诱导和维持的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、单盲、随机、平行分组、3 期临床试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jun 1;40(6):399-406. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001799. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
5
A case report of ciprofol overdose during anesthesia/analgesia and literature review: clinical presentation, blood pressure, and management.一例麻醉/镇痛期间西普罗夫过量的病例报告及文献复习:临床表现、血压及处理。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Nov;50(11):3000605221132466. doi: 10.1177/03000605221132466.
6
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for general anaesthesia induction in elderly patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: A randomised controlled pilot trial.环丙泊酚用于老年非心脏大手术患者全身麻醉诱导的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Dec 1;39(12):960-963. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001759.
7
Benzodiazepines in the Management of Seizures and Status Epilepticus: A Review of Routes of Delivery, Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Tolerability.苯二氮䓬类药物在癫痫发作和癫痫持续状态管理中的应用:给药途径、药代动力学、疗效和耐受性的综述。
CNS Drugs. 2022 Sep;36(9):951-975. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00940-2. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
8
Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia.无痛胃肠镜麻醉中患者术中不良反应、手术、复苏以及满意度比较及西普罗和丙泊酚的临床价值。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul 18;2022:9541060. doi: 10.1155/2022/9541060. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial.比较西普鲁福(HSK3486)与异丙酚用于胃镜和结肠镜检查中深度镇静诱导的效果:一项多中心、非劣效性、随机、对照 3 期临床试验。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Aug;131(2):138-148. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13761. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
10
Effects of ciprofol for the induction of general anesthesia in patients scheduled for elective surgery compared to propofol: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative study.比较西普鲁福用于择期手术患者全身麻醉诱导与丙泊酚的效果:一项 3 期、多中心、随机、双盲、对照研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Mar;26(5):1607-1617. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202203_28228.