利用人工智能增强健康研究中的系统评价：高级工具和挑战。
Leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance systematic reviews in health research: advanced tools and challenges.
机构信息
Health Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Level 4 @ NSC, 1 Mandalay Rd, Singapore, 308205, Singapore.
Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
出版信息
Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 25;13(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02682-2.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming systematic reviews (SRs) in health research by automating processes such as study screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. This perspective highlights recent advancements in AI tools that enhance efficiency and accuracy in SRs. It discusses the benefits, challenges, and future directions of AI integration, emphasising the need for human oversight to ensure the reliability of AI outputs in evidence synthesis and decision-making in healthcare.
摘要
人工智能（AI）正在通过自动化研究筛选、数据提取和质量评估等流程，改变健康研究中的系统评价（SR）。本文从这一视角强调了 AI 工具在提高 SR 效率和准确性方面的最新进展，探讨了 AI 集成的益处、挑战和未来方向，强调了在医疗保健中的证据综合和决策中，需要人为监督以确保 AI 输出的可靠性。
相似文献
1
Leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance systematic reviews in health research: advanced tools and challenges.利用人工智能增强健康研究中的系统评价：高级工具和挑战。
Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 25;13(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02682-2.
2
Development and reporting of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis management.人工智能在骨质疏松症管理中的发展和报告。
J Bone Miner Res. 2024 Oct 29;39(11):1553-1573. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae131.
3
Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools for the automation of systematic reviews in cancer research: A systematic review.评估人工智能工具在癌症研究系统评价自动化中的功效：一项系统评价。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;88:102511. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102511. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
4
Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review.利用人工智能方法进行健康科学系统评价：系统评价。
Res Synth Methods. 2022 May;13(3):353-362. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1553. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Artificial intelligence and its impact on the domains of universal health coverage, health emergencies and health promotion: An overview of systematic reviews.人工智能及其对全民健康覆盖、卫生应急和健康促进领域的影响：系统评价概述。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Oct;166:104855. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104855. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
6
Exploring decision-makers' challenges and strategies when selecting multiple systematic reviews: insights for AI decision support tools in healthcare.探讨决策者在选择多个系统评价时所面临的挑战和策略：对医疗保健中 AI 决策支持工具的启示。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 5;14(7):e084124. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084124.
7
Methodological evaluation of systematic reviews based on the use of artificial intelligence systems in chest radiography.基于人工智能系统在胸部 X 光摄影中的应用的系统评价方法学评估。
Radiologia (Engl Ed). 2024 Jul-Aug;66(4):326-339. doi: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2023.01.015. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
8
Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Diabetic Retinopathy Detection: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.人工智能算法在糖尿病视网膜病变检测中的评估：系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 27;13:e57292. doi: 10.2196/57292.
9
Use of Artificial Intelligence tools in supporting decision-making in hospital management.人工智能工具在医院管理决策支持中的应用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 25;24(1):1282. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11602-y.
10
Methods for using Bing's AI-powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review.使用必应的人工智能搜索引擎进行数据提取以进行系统评价的方法。
Res Synth Methods. 2024 Mar;15(2):347-353. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1689. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
引用本文的文献
1
Assessing TDApp: An AI-based clinical decision support system for ADHD treatment recommendations.评估TDApp：一种基于人工智能的用于多动症治疗建议的临床决策支持系统。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 22;16:1582746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1582746. eCollection 2025.
2
Using artificial intelligence for the development of a living evidence map: The pharmacopuncture example.利用人工智能开发动态证据图谱：以水针疗法为例。
Integr Med Res. 2025 Dec;14(4):101217. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101217. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
3
Transparency, quality, and statistical consistency of meta-analytic systematic reviews in clinical child and adolescent psychology (2022-2024): study protocol for a meta-review.临床儿童与青少年心理学中荟萃分析系统评价的透明度、质量和统计一致性（2022 - 2024）：一项元综述的研究方案
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 28;16:1535606. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1535606. eCollection 2025.
4
A 25-year retrospective of Canadian plastic surgery research and its influence: a bibliometric study.加拿大整形外科学术研究25年回顾及其影响：一项文献计量学研究
Can J Surg. 2025 Jul 15;68(4):E296-E304. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012024. Print 2025 Jul-Aug.
5
Using Artificial Intelligence Tools as Second Reviewers for Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: A Performance Comparison of Two AI Tools Against Human Reviewers.使用人工智能工具作为系统评价中数据提取的二审人员：两种人工智能工具与人类评审员的性能比较
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Jul 14;3(4):e70036. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70036. eCollection 2025 Jul.
6
Validation of The Umbrella Collaboration for Tertiary Evidence Synthesis in Geriatrics: Mixed Methods Study.老年医学三级证据综合的伞状合作验证：混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 8;9:e75215. doi: 10.2196/75215.
7
The meta-analysis and systematic review mirage: when data synthesis becomes data distortion.元分析与系统评价的幻象：数据合成何时变成数据扭曲。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 5;33(7):538. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09615-2.
8
A systematic methodological evaluation of sepsis guidelines: Protocol for quality assessment and consistency of recommendations.脓毒症指南的系统方法学评估：质量评估与建议一致性方案
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Jul;69(6):e70036. doi: 10.1111/aas.70036.
9
Potential Meets Practicality: AI's Current Impact on the Evidence Generation and Synthesis Pipeline in Health Economics.潜力与实用性相遇：人工智能目前对健康经济学中证据生成与综合流程的影响
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr;18(4):e70206. doi: 10.1111/cts.70206.
10
On the ethical and moral dimensions of using artificial intelligence for evidence synthesis.关于使用人工智能进行证据综合的伦理和道德维度。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 19;5(3):e0004348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004348. eCollection 2025.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluating the effectiveness of large language models in abstract screening: a comparative analysis.评估大型语言模型在摘要筛选中的有效性：一项对比分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 21;13(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02609-x.
2
How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools.如何使用人工智能工具优化系统评价过程。
JCPP Adv. 2024 Apr 23;4(2):e12234. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12234. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence.基于人工智能的诊断和预后预测模型研究报告指南（TRIPOD-AI）和偏倚风险工具（PROBAST-AI）制定方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e048008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048008.
4
An evaluation of DistillerSR's machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening - impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes.评估基于机器学习的 DistillerSR 优先筛选工具在标题/摘要筛选中的应用——对与评审员相关结果的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 15;20(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01129-1.
5
The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr's relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews.标题和摘要筛选的半自动化：一种利用 Abstrackr 的相关性预测进行系统和快速综述的回溯性探索方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01031-w.
6
Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation.支持医疗保健系统评价标题和摘要筛选的软件工具：评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3.
7
Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis.迈向系统评价自动化：在研究综合中使用机器学习工具的实用指南。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 11;8(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1074-9.
8
A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?信任的问题：我们能否建立一个证据基础，以获得对系统评价自动化技术的信任？
Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 18;8(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1062-0.
9
RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials.机器人评审员：用于自动评估临床试验偏倚的系统评估
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):193-201. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv044. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classification.使用自动引文分类减少系统评价准备工作中的工作量。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):206-19. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1929. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
Zotero 插件