• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估非洲的电子健康投资:范围综述和框架制定。

Appraising eHealth Investment for Africa: Scoping Review and Development of a Framework.

机构信息

Department of TeleHealth, School of Nursing & Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa.

Health Information Systems Program South Africa, Pretoria 0181, South Africa.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 25;21(10):1277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101277.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21101277
PMID:39457250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11507607/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As opportunities grow for resource-constrained countries to use eHealth (digital health) to strengthen health systems, a dilemma arises. Wise eHealth investments require adequate appraisal to address opportunity costs. Economic appraisal techniques conventionally utilised for this purpose require sufficient economic expertise and adequate data that are frequently in short supply in low- and middle-income countries. This paper aims to identify, and, if required, develop, a suitable framework for performing eHealth investment appraisals in settings of limited economic expertise and data.

METHODS

Four progressive steps were followed: (1) identify required framework attributes from published checklists; (2) select, review, and chart relevant frameworks using a scoping review; (3) analyse the frameworks using deductive and inductive iterations; and, if necessary, (4) develop a new framework using findings from the first three steps.

RESULTS

Twenty-four candidate investment appraisal attributes were identified and seven relevant frameworks were selected for review. Analysis of these frameworks led to the refinement of the candidate attributes to 23 final attributes, and each framework was compared against them. No individual framework adequately addressed sufficient attributes. A new framework was developed that addressed all 23 final attributes.

CONCLUSIONS

A new evidence-based investment appraisal framework has been developed that provides a practical, business case focus for use in resource-constrained African settings.

摘要

背景

随着资源有限的国家利用电子健康(数字健康)来加强卫生系统的机会不断增加,出现了一个困境。明智的电子健康投资需要进行充分评估,以解决机会成本问题。为此目的而传统使用的经济评估技术需要足够的经济专业知识和充足的数据,而这些在中低收入国家往往都很缺乏。本文旨在确定并在经济专业知识和数据有限的情况下,为电子健康投资评估制定一个合适的框架。

方法

采用了四个渐进的步骤:(1)从已发表的清单中确定所需框架属性;(2)使用范围综述选择、审查和绘制相关框架;(3)使用演绎和归纳迭代分析框架;以及(4)如有必要,使用前三个步骤的结果开发一个新框架。

结果

确定了 24 个候选投资评估属性,并选择了 7 个相关框架进行审查。对这些框架的分析导致对候选属性进行了细化,最终确定了 23 个最终属性,每个框架都与这些属性进行了比较。没有一个单独的框架能够充分满足足够的属性。开发了一个新的框架,该框架涵盖了所有 23 个最终属性。

结论

已经开发了一个新的基于证据的投资评估框架,为资源有限的非洲环境提供了一个实用的、注重商业案例的方法。

相似文献

1
Appraising eHealth Investment for Africa: Scoping Review and Development of a Framework.评估非洲的电子健康投资:范围综述和框架制定。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 25;21(10):1277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101277.
2
EHealth Investment Appraisal in Africa: A Scoping Review.电子健康投资评估在非洲:范围综述。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211059999. doi: 10.1177/00469580211059999.
3
A New eHealth Investment Appraisal Framework for Africa: Validation.非洲新的电子健康投资评估框架:验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 21;20(14):6426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146426.
4
Applicability of the five case model to African eHealth investment decisions.五案例模型在非洲电子健康投资决策中的适用性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05526-6.
5
Principles and framework for eHealth strategy development.电子健康战略制定的原则与框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jul 30;15(7):e155. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2250.
6
Unlocking the eHealth professionals' career pathways: A case of Gulf Cooperation Council countries.解锁电子健康专业人员的职业发展路径:以海湾合作委员会国家为例。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104914. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
7
Hospital Investment Decisions in Healthcare 4.0 Technologies: Scoping Review and Framework for Exploring Challenges, Trends, and Research Directions.医疗 4.0 技术下的医院投资决策:探索挑战、趋势和研究方向的范围综述和框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 26;23(8):e27571. doi: 10.2196/27571.
8
eHealth policy framework in Low and Lower Middle-Income Countries; a PRISMA systematic review and analysis.中低收入国家的电子健康政策框架:PRISMA 系统评价和分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09325-7.
9
The economics of eHealth and mHealth.电子健康和移动健康的经济学。
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 1:73-81. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.649158.
10
Methods for Human-Centered eHealth Development: Narrative Scoping Review.以人为中心的电子健康发展方法:叙事范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 27;24(1):e31858. doi: 10.2196/31858.

本文引用的文献

1
Cashing in: cost-benefit analysis framework for digital hospitals.变现:数字医院的成本效益分析框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 31;24(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11132-7.
2
Show me the money: how do we justify spending health care dollars on digital health?钱花得值吗:我们如何证明将医疗保健资金投入数字健康领域是合理的?
Med J Aust. 2023 Feb 6;218(2):53-57. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51799. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
3
EHealth Investment Appraisal in Africa: A Scoping Review.电子健康投资评估在非洲:范围综述。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211059999. doi: 10.1177/00469580211059999.
4
Preliminary Development of Value Scorecards as ICU Telemedicine Evaluation Tools.价值计分卡作为 ICU 远程医疗评估工具的初步开发。
J Healthc Manag. 2021;66(2):124-138. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-19-00188.
5
Applicability of the five case model to African eHealth investment decisions.五案例模型在非洲电子健康投资决策中的适用性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05526-6.
6
COVID-19: A Window of Opportunity for Positive Healthcare Reforms.COVID-19:推动医疗改革的契机。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Oct 1;9(10):419-422. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.66.
7
Health technology assessment frameworks for eHealth: A systematic review.电子健康健康技术评估框架:系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):204-216. doi: 10.1017/S026646232000015X. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
8
How Can Digital Health Technologies Contribute to Sustainable Attainment of Universal Health Coverage in Africa? A Perspective.数字健康技术如何助力非洲可持续实现全民健康覆盖?一种观点。
Front Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;7:341. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00341. eCollection 2019.
9
The Positivism Paradigm of Research.研究的实证主义范式。
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):690-694. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093.
10
Problems and Promises of Health Technologies: The Role of Early Health Economic Modeling.卫生技术的问题与前景:早期卫生经济建模的作用。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Oct 1;8(10):575-582. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.36.