• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟患者信息传单用户测试政策面临的挑战。

The Challenges for EU User Testing Policies for Patient Information Leaflets.

机构信息

School of Education, Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Park Building, King Henry I St., Portsmouth PO1 2BZ, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 29;21(10):1301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101301.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21101301
PMID:39457274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11507276/
Abstract

Patient information leaflets (PILs) are essential tools in healthcare, providing crucial information about medication use. In the European Union, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) oversees the regulation and standardisation of PILs to ensure their readability and accessibility. However, challenges persist in ensuring these documents are comprehensible and user-friendly. This study employs a qualitative analytical approach, reviewing existing literature and regulatory documents to identify gaps in the EU user testing policies for PILs. It focuses on the diversity of participant samples, the independence of the testing process, and the robustness of user testing protocols. Findings indicate that current user testing practices often lack diversity and may be biased when pharmaceutical companies conduct their own tests. Additionally, there is a lack of user testing protocols for translated PILs, potentially compromising their accuracy and cultural relevance. To improve the efficacy of PILs, it is essential to include diverse and representative samples in user testing, mandate independent third-party evaluations, implement protocols for user testing on translated PILs, and ensure continuous updates to guidelines based on the latest best practices in health communication. These measures will enhance patient safety and understanding of medication information.

摘要

患者信息手册(PILs)是医疗保健中必不可少的工具,提供了关于药物使用的重要信息。在欧盟,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)负责监管和规范 PILs,以确保其可读性和可及性。然而,在确保这些文件易懂且便于用户使用方面仍然存在挑战。本研究采用定性分析方法,审查现有文献和监管文件,以确定 PIL 用户测试政策在欧盟存在的差距。它侧重于参与者样本的多样性、测试过程的独立性以及用户测试协议的稳健性。研究结果表明,目前的用户测试实践往往缺乏多样性,并且制药公司进行自己的测试时可能存在偏见。此外,对于翻译后的 PIL,缺乏用户测试协议,可能会影响其准确性和文化相关性。为了提高 PIL 的效果,在用户测试中纳入多样化和有代表性的样本、强制进行独立的第三方评估、为翻译后的 PIL 实施用户测试协议以及根据健康传播的最新最佳实践不断更新指南至关重要。这些措施将提高患者安全性和对药物信息的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1327/11507276/926fbf7e08ca/ijerph-21-01301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1327/11507276/926fbf7e08ca/ijerph-21-01301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1327/11507276/926fbf7e08ca/ijerph-21-01301-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Challenges for EU User Testing Policies for Patient Information Leaflets.欧盟患者信息传单用户测试政策面临的挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 29;21(10):1301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101301.
2
[Drug information for patients (Package Leaflets), and user testing in EU].[患者用药信息(包装说明书)及欧盟用户测试]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2015;135(2):277-84. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.14-00232-2.
3
Worth the paper they are printed on? Findings from an independent evaluation of the understandability of patient information leaflets for antiseizure medications.纸上谈兵?抗癫痫药物患者信息传单易懂性的独立评估结果。
Epilepsia. 2022 Aug;63(8):2130-2143. doi: 10.1111/epi.17299. Epub 2022 May 31.
4
Readability and content of patient information leaflets for endoscopic procedures.内镜检查患者须知手册的可读性和内容。
Ir J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;183(3):429-32. doi: 10.1007/s11845-013-1033-8. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
5
Patient information leaflets (PILs) for UK randomised controlled trials: a feasibility study exploring whether they contain information to support decision making about trial participation.英国随机对照试验患者信息传单(PILs):一项探索其是否包含支持参与试验决策的信息的可行性研究。
Trials. 2014 Feb 18;15:62. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-62.
6
Evaluation of the Readability of Dermatological Postoperative Patient Information Leaflets Across England.英格兰皮肤科术后患者信息手册可读性评估
Dermatol Surg. 2016 Jun;42(6):757-63. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000720.
7
Changes in Side Effect Risk Communication in Patient Information Leaflets over the Past Decade: Results of a Survey.过去十年患者信息单页中副作用风险沟通的变化:一项调查结果
Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;38(8):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0307-7.
8
Patient information leaflets and package inserts of ibuprofen provided in the UK and Thailand: a comparative assessment.英国和泰国提供的布洛芬患者信息单页和药品说明书:一项比较评估。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2024 May 7;32(3):208-215. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riae007.
9
Improving meningococcal MenACWY and 4CMenB/meningococcal group B vaccine-related health literacy in patients: Importance of readability of pharmaceutical Patient Leaflets.提高患者中与脑膜炎球菌性A、C、W、Y群及B群脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗(4CMenB)相关的健康素养:药品患者说明书可读性的重要性
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Aug;46(4):1109-1116. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13405. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
10
Retention strategies are routinely communicated to potential trial participants but often differ from what was planned in the trial protocol: an analysis of adult participant information leaflets and their corresponding protocols.保留策略通常会传达给潜在的试验参与者,但往往与试验方案中计划的内容不同:对成年参与者信息传单及其相应方案的分析。
Trials. 2024 Jun 10;25(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08194-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors that Facilitate and Hinder the Comprehension of Patient Information Leaflets (PILs): A Brief Scoping Review.促进和阻碍患者信息手册(PILs)理解的因素:一项简要的范围综述
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 10;12:740334. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.740334. eCollection 2021.
2
Preventing Home Medication Administration Errors.防止家庭用药错误。
Pediatrics. 2021 Dec 1;148(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-054666.
3
Shaping EU medicines regulation in the post COVID-19 era.塑造新冠疫情后时代的欧盟药品监管
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Oct;9:100192. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100192. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
4
What should patients do if they miss a dose? A systematic review of patient information leaflets and summaries of product characteristics.如果患者漏服了一剂药物该怎么办?对患者用药信息单和产品特性摘要的系统评价。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Feb;77(2):251-260. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03003-x. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
5
Do Patients Use a Headline Section in a Leaflet to Find Key Information About Their Medicines? Findings From a User-Test Study.患者是否会通过传单的标题部分来查找有关其药物的关键信息?一项用户测试研究的结果。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Sep;50(5):581-591. doi: 10.1177/2168479016639080. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
6
Health information systems evaluation frameworks: A systematic review.健康信息系统评估框架:一项系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
7
How useful are medication patient information leaflets to older adults? A content, readability and layout analysis.药物患者信息传单对老年人有多有用?内容、可读性和布局分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Aug;36(4):827-34. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9973-2. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
8
Improving patient information leaflets: developing and applying an evaluative model of patient-centredness for text.改进患者信息手册:开发并应用以患者为中心的文本评估模型。
Commun Med. 2013;10(2):105-15. doi: 10.1558/cam.v10i2.105.
9
How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health.如何减少框架效应对健康信息的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Dec;25(12):1323-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1484-9. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
10
Improving the usability of patient information leaflets.提高患者信息传单的可用性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.030. Epub 2009 Oct 23.