Suppr超能文献

眼动追踪能否帮助评估非言语性脑损伤患者的意识状态?

Can Eye Tracking Help Assess the State of Consciousness in Non-Verbal Brain Injury Patients?

作者信息

Zurek Grzegorz, Binder Marek, Kunka Bartosz, Kosikowski Robert, Rodzeń Małgorzata, Karaś Danuta, Mucha Gabriela, Olejniczak Roman, Gorączko Agata, Kujawa Katarzyna, Stachowicz Anna, Kryś-Noszczyk Karolina, Dryjska Joanna, Dryjski Marcin, Szczygieł Jarosław

机构信息

Department of Biostructure, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wrocław, Poland.

Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, 30-060 Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 18;13(20):6227. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206227.

Abstract

Developments in eye-tracking technology are opening up new possibilities for diagnosing patients in a state of minimal consciousness because they can provide information on visual behavior, and the movements of the eyeballs are correlated with the patients' level of consciousness. The purpose of this study was to provide validation of a tool, based on eye tracking by comparing the results obtained with the assessment obtained using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). The mul-ti-center clinical trial was conducted in Poland in 2022-2023. The results of 46 patients who were not able to communicate verbally due to severe brain injury were analyzed in this study. The state of consciousness of patients was assessed using the Minimally Conscious State Detection test (MCSD), installed on an eye tracker and compared to CRS-R. The examinations consisted of performing the MCSD test on patients five times (T1-T5) within 14 days. Collected data were processed based on the FDA and GCP's regulatory requirements. Depending on the nature of the data, the mean and standard deviation, median and lower and upper quartiles, and maximum and minimum values were calculated. Passing-Bablok regression analysis was used to assess the measurement equiva-lence of the methods used. There was no difference between the MCSD and CRS-R in the raw change between T5 and T1 time points, as well as in the total % of points from all time points. The MCSD results from each time point show that at least the first two measurements serve to famil-iarize and adapt the patient to the measurement process, and the third and next measurement should be considered reliable. The results indicated a significant relationship be-tween the scores obtained with MCSD and CRS-R. The results suggest that it seems reasonable to introduce an assessment of the patient's state of consciousness based on eye-tracking technology. The use of modern technology to assess a patient's state of consciousness opens up the opportunity for greater objectivity, as well as a reduction in the workload of qualified personnel.

摘要

眼动追踪技术的发展为诊断处于最小意识状态的患者开辟了新的可能性,因为它们可以提供有关视觉行为的信息,并且眼球运动与患者的意识水平相关。本研究的目的是通过比较使用眼动追踪获得的结果与使用修订版昏迷恢复量表(CRS-R)获得的评估结果,来验证一种基于眼动追踪的工具。这项多中心临床试验于2022年至2023年在波兰进行。本研究分析了46名因严重脑损伤而无法进行言语交流的患者的结果。使用安装在眼动仪上的最小意识状态检测测试(MCSD)对患者的意识状态进行评估,并与CRS-R进行比较。检查包括在14天内对患者进行5次MCSD测试(T1-T5)。收集的数据根据美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和药品临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)的监管要求进行处理。根据数据的性质,计算均值和标准差、中位数以及上下四分位数,以及最大值和最小值。使用Passing-Bablok回归分析来评估所使用方法的测量等效性。在T5和T1时间点之间的原始变化以及所有时间点的总分百分比方面,MCSD和CRS-R之间没有差异。每个时间点的MCSD结果表明,至少前两次测量用于使患者熟悉并适应测量过程,第三次及后续测量应被视为可靠的。结果表明MCSD和CRS-R获得的分数之间存在显著关系。结果表明,引入基于眼动追踪技术的患者意识状态评估似乎是合理的。使用现代技术评估患者的意识状态为提高客观性以及减少合格人员的工作量提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/defa/11508250/0ba9adf4abc6/jcm-13-06227-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验