Control Systems Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Einsteinufer 17, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Clinic for Ear, Nose and Throat Medicine, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin (UKB), Warener Str. 7, 12683 Berlin, Germany.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 10;24(20):6525. doi: 10.3390/s24206525.
Several studies support the benefits of biofeedback and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) in dysphagia therapy. Most commonly, adhesive electrodes are placed on the submental region of the neck to conduct Electromyography (EMG) measurements for controlling gamified biofeedback and functional electrical stimulation. Due to the diverse origin of EMG activity at the neck, it can be assumed that EMG measurements alone do not accurately reflect the onset of the pharyngeal swallowing phase (onset of swallowing). To date, no study has addressed the timing and detection performance of swallow onsets on a comprehensive database including dysphagia patients. This study includes EMG and BioImpedance (BI) measurements of 41 dysphagia patients to compare the timing and performance in the Detection of Swallow Onsets (DoSO) using EMG alone versus combined BI and EMG measurements. The latter approach employs a BI-based data segmentation of potential swallow onsets and a machine-learning-based classifier to distinguish swallow onsets from non-swallow events. Swallow onsets labeled by an expert serve as a reference. In addition to the F1 score, the mean and standard deviation of the detection delay regarding reference events have been determined. The EMG-based DoSO achieved an F1 score of 0.289 with a detection delay of 0.018 s ± 0.203 s. In comparison, the BI/EMG-based DoSO achieved an F1 score of 0.546 with a detection delay of 0.033 s ± 0.1 s. Therefore, the BI/EMG-based DoSO has better timing and detection performance compared to the EMG-based DoSO and potentially improves biofeedback and FES in dysphagia therapy.
几项研究支持生物反馈和功能性电刺激(FES)在吞咽障碍治疗中的益处。最常见的是,将粘性电极放置在颈部的颏下区域,以进行肌电图(EMG)测量,以控制游戏化的生物反馈和功能性电刺激。由于颈部的 EMG 活动来源多样,可以假设 EMG 测量本身不能准确反映咽吞咽阶段的开始(吞咽开始)。迄今为止,尚无研究针对吞咽开始的时间和检测性能在包括吞咽障碍患者在内的综合数据库中进行研究。本研究包括 41 名吞咽障碍患者的 EMG 和生物阻抗(BI)测量,以比较单独使用 EMG 与结合 BI 和 EMG 测量进行吞咽开始检测(DoSO)的时间和性能。后一种方法采用基于 BI 的潜在吞咽开始的数据分段和基于机器学习的分类器,将吞咽开始与非吞咽事件区分开来。专家标记的吞咽开始用作参考。除了 F1 分数外,还确定了参考事件的检测延迟的平均值和标准偏差。基于 EMG 的 DoSO 的 F1 得分为 0.289,检测延迟为 0.018 s ± 0.203 s。相比之下,BI/EMG 基于 DoSO 的 F1 得分为 0.546,检测延迟为 0.033 s ± 0.1 s。因此,与基于 EMG 的 DoSO 相比,BI/EMG 基于 DoSO 的时间和检测性能更好,并且可能改善吞咽障碍治疗中的生物反馈和 FES。