Song Yun-Feng, Huang Hao-Neng, Ma Jia-Jun, Xing Rui, Song Yu-Qi, Li Li, Zhou Jin, Ou Chun-Quan
The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Biostatistics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13201. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13201. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
Early recognition of sepsis, a common life-threatening condition in intensive care units (ICUs), is beneficial for improving patient outcomes. However, most sepsis prediction models were trained and assessed in the ICU, which might not apply to emergency department (ED) settings.
To establish an early predictive model based on basic but essential information collected upon ED presentation for the follow-up diagnosis of sepsis observed in the ICU.
This study developed and validated a reliable model of sepsis prediction among ED patients by comparing 10 different methods based on retrospective electronic health record data from the MIMIC-IV database. In-ICU sepsis was identified as the primary outcome. The potential predictors encompassed baseline demographics, vital signs, pain scale, chief complaints and Emergency Severity Index (ESI). 80% and 20% of the total of 425 737 ED visit records were randomly selected for the train set and the test set for model development and validation, respectively.
Among the methods evaluated, XGBoost demonstrated an optimal predictive performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.90-0.91). Logistic regression exhibited a comparable predictive ability to XGBoost, with an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.89-0.90), along with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% (95% CI: 0.83-0.86) and 78% (95% CI: 0.77-0.80), respectively. Neither of the five commonly used severity scoring systems demonstrated satisfactory performance for sepsis prediction. The predictive ability of using ESI as the sole predictor (AUC: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.78-0.80) was also inferior to the model integrating ESI and other basic information.
The use of ESI combined with basic clinical information upon ED presentation accurately predicted sepsis among ED patients, strengthening its application in ED.
The proposed model may assist nurses in risk stratification management and prioritize interventions for potential sepsis patients, even in low-resource settings.
脓毒症是重症监护病房(ICU)常见的危及生命的病症,早期识别有助于改善患者预后。然而,大多数脓毒症预测模型是在ICU中进行训练和评估的,可能不适用于急诊科(ED)环境。
基于急诊科就诊时收集的基本但关键信息建立早期预测模型,用于后续对在ICU中观察到的脓毒症进行诊断。
本研究通过比较基于MIMIC-IV数据库回顾性电子健康记录数据的10种不同方法,开发并验证了一种可靠的急诊科患者脓毒症预测模型。ICU内脓毒症被确定为主要结局。潜在预测因素包括基线人口统计学特征、生命体征、疼痛量表、主要症状和急诊严重程度指数(ESI)。在425737条急诊就诊记录中,分别随机抽取80%和20%作为训练集和测试集,用于模型开发和验证。
在评估的方法中,XGBoost表现出最佳预测性能,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.90(95%CI:0.90 - 0.91)。逻辑回归显示出与XGBoost相当的预测能力,AUC为0.89(95%CI:0.89 - 0.90),敏感性和特异性分别为85%(95%CI:0.83 - 0.86)和78%(95%CI:0.77 - 0.80)。五种常用的严重程度评分系统在脓毒症预测方面均未表现出令人满意的性能。仅使用ESI作为预测因素的预测能力(AUC:0.79,95%CI:0.78 - 0.80)也低于整合了ESI和其他基本信息的模型。
在急诊科就诊时使用ESI结合基本临床信息能够准确预测脓毒症,加强了其在急诊科的应用。
所提出的模型可协助护士进行风险分层管理,并对潜在脓毒症患者的干预措施进行优先排序,即使在资源有限的环境中也是如此。