Service of General Psychiatry, Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College of London, London, UK.
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):454. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03149-7.
Childhood adversity is associated with various clinical dimensions in psychosis; however, how genetic vulnerability shapes the adversity-associated psychopathological signature is yet to be studied. We studied data of 583 First Episode Psychosis (FEP) cases from the EU-GEI FEP case-control study, including Polygenic risk scores for major depressive disorder (MDD-PRS), bipolar disorder (BD-PRS) and schizophrenia (SZ-PRS); childhood adversity measured with the total score of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ); and positive, negative, depressive and manic psychopathological domains from a factor model of transdiagnostic dimensions. Genes and environment interactions were explored as a departure from a multiplicative effect of PRSs and total CTQ on each dimension. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, 10 PCA, site of recruitment and for medication. A childhood adversity and PRS multiplicative interaction was observed between A) the CTQ and MDD-PRS on the predominance of positive (β = 0.42, 95% CI = [0.155, 0.682], p = 0.004); and depressive (β = 0.33, 95% CI = [0.071, 0.591], p = 0.013) dimensions; B) between the CTQ and BD-PRS on the positive dimension (β = 0.45, 95% CI = [0.106, 0.798], p = 0.010), and C) with the CTQ and SZ-PRS on the positive dimension (β = -0.34, 95% CI = [-0.660, -0.015], p = 0.040). Bonferroni corrected p-value of significance was set at 0.0125. In conclusion, despite being underpowered, this study suggests that genetic liability for MDD and BD may have a moderating effect on the sensibility of childhood adversity on depressive and positive psychotic dimensions. This supports the hypothesis of an affective pathway to psychosis in those exposed to childhood adversity.
儿童时期逆境与精神病学中的各种临床维度有关;然而,遗传易感性如何影响与逆境相关的精神病理学特征尚未得到研究。我们研究了来自欧盟-基因-精神病学研究的 583 例首发精神病(FEP)病例的数据,包括重度抑郁症(MDD-PRS)、双相障碍(BD-PRS)和精神分裂症(SZ-PRS)的多基因风险评分;使用儿童创伤问卷(CTQ)总分衡量儿童期逆境;以及从跨诊断维度的因子模型中得出的阳性、阴性、抑郁和躁狂精神病理学领域。探索了基因与环境的相互作用,作为 PRS 和 CTQ 总分对每个维度的乘法效应的偏离。分析调整了年龄、性别、10 个 PCA、招募地点和药物治疗。观察到儿童逆境和 PRS 之间的乘法相互作用 A)CTQ 与 MDD-PRS 之间的阳性(β=0.42,95%CI=[0.155,0.682],p=0.004)和抑郁(β=0.33,95%CI=[0.071,0.591],p=0.013)维度占优势;B)CTQ 与 BD-PRS 之间的阳性维度(β=0.45,95%CI=[0.106,0.798],p=0.010);C)CTQ 与 SZ-PRS 之间的阳性维度(β=-0.34,95%CI=[-0.660,-0.015],p=0.040)。显著意义的 Bonferroni 校正 p 值设定为 0.0125。总之,尽管效力不足,但这项研究表明,MDD 和 BD 的遗传易感性可能对儿童期逆境对抑郁和阳性精神病维度的敏感性具有调节作用。这支持了在经历儿童期逆境的个体中存在情感途径导致精神病的假说。