Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Norment, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(5):1970-1978. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721003664. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
A history of childhood adversity is associated with psychotic disorder, with an increase in risk according to the number of exposures. However, it is not known why only some exposed individuals go on to develop psychosis. One possibility is pre-existing polygenic vulnerability. Here, we investigated, in the largest sample of first-episode psychosis (FEP) cases to date, whether childhood adversity and high polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia (SZ-PRS) combine synergistically to increase the risk of psychosis, over and above the effect of each alone.
We assigned a schizophrenia-polygenic risk score (SZ-PRS), calculated from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC2), to all participants in a sample of 384 FEP patients and 690 controls from the case-control component of the EU-GEI study. Only participants of European ancestry were included in the study. A history of childhood adversity was collected using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Synergistic effects were estimated using the interaction contrast ratio (ICR) [odds ratio (OR) - OR - OR + 1] with adjustment for potential confounders.
There was some evidence that the combined effect of childhood adversities and polygenic risk was greater than the sum of each alone, as indicated by an ICR greater than zero [i.e. ICR 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.29 to 3.85]. Examining subtypes of childhood adversities, the strongest synergetic effect was observed for physical abuse (ICR 6.25, 95% CI -6.25 to 20.88).
Our findings suggest possible synergistic effects of genetic liability and childhood adversity experiences in the onset of FEP, but larger samples are needed to increase precision of estimates.
儿童期逆境史与精神病障碍相关,暴露于逆境的次数越多,风险就越高。然而,为什么只有一些暴露于逆境的个体发展为精神病,目前尚不清楚。一种可能是存在预先存在的多基因易感性。在这里,我们在迄今为止最大的首发精神病(FEP)病例样本中进行了研究,即儿童期逆境和精神分裂症的高多基因风险评分(SZ-PRS)是否协同作用,共同增加精神病的风险,超过了每种因素的单独作用。
我们将从精神疾病基因组学联合会(PGC2)计算得出的精神分裂症多基因风险评分(SZ-PRS)分配给来自 EU-GEI 研究病例对照部分的 384 名 FEP 患者和 690 名对照的所有参与者。该研究仅纳入欧洲血统的参与者。使用儿童期创伤问卷(CTQ)收集儿童期逆境史。通过交互对比比(ICR)[比值比(OR)-OR-OR+1]进行协同作用的估计,调整了潜在混杂因素。
有一些证据表明,童年逆境和多基因风险的综合效应大于每个因素的单独效应,因为 ICR 大于零[即 ICR 1.28,95%置信区间(CI)-1.29 至 3.85]。在检查童年逆境的亚型时,观察到身体虐待的协同作用最强(ICR 6.25,95%CI-6.25 至 20.88)。
我们的发现表明,遗传易感性和儿童期逆境经历在首发精神病的发病中可能存在协同作用,但需要更大的样本量来提高估计的精度。