Alakhras M, Al-Mousa D S, Al Mohammad B, Kleib I
Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan; School of Dentistry and Health Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Clin Radiol. 2025 Feb;81:106712. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.018. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
To evaluate radiation dose among physicians, nurses, nuclear medicine (NM) technicians, and radiographers at a single institution and to compare the difference in the measured dose during COVID-19 with other periods.
A retrospective analysis of the occupational radiation doses received by all workers in diagnostic radiography and NM departments at a single institution during a 5-year period (2018-2022) was performed. Dose measurements were recorded for 94 radiology personnel: radiographers, NM technicians, physicians, and nurses. In addition to descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the average annual effective dose between male and female workers and between the periods before and during COVID-19. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare effective radiation doses from different quadrants.
The annual average effective doses were found to be between 0.58 and 0.72 mSv for males and 0.68 and 0.85 mSv for females. All radiographers, 86% of nurses, and 69% of physicians have received annual average effective doses below 0.99 mSv. The average annual effective doses for all radiation workers were similar in the period before COVID-19 when compared to the period during COVID-19 except for nurses who had significantly lower (P<0.05) doses before COVID-19.
The average annual effective doses of radiation workers during 2018-2022 were well below the annual dose limit. A relatively higher average effective dose was received among NM technicians compared with other radiation occupational workers. While the caseload during the COVID-19 pandemic was lower due to government policies, the radiation dose to healthcare workers during the pandemic was similar to that before the pandemic.
评估单一机构中医生、护士、核医学(NM)技术人员和放射技师的辐射剂量,并比较新冠疫情期间与其他时期测量剂量的差异。
对单一机构诊断放射科和核医学科所有工作人员在5年期间(2018 - 2022年)所接受的职业辐射剂量进行回顾性分析。记录了94名放射科人员的剂量测量数据:放射技师、核医学技术人员、医生和护士。除描述性统计外,采用曼 - 惠特尼U检验比较男性和女性工作人员之间以及新冠疫情之前和期间的平均年有效剂量。采用克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验比较不同象限的有效辐射剂量。
发现男性的年平均有效剂量在0.58至0.72毫希沃特之间,女性在0.68至0.85毫希沃特之间。所有放射技师、86%的护士和69%的医生的年平均有效剂量低于0.99毫希沃特。与新冠疫情期间相比,除护士在新冠疫情之前的剂量显著较低(P<0.05)外,所有辐射工作人员在新冠疫情之前的平均年有效剂量与疫情期间相似。
2018 - 2022年期间辐射工作人员的年平均有效剂量远低于年剂量限值。与其他辐射职业工作人员相比,核医学技术人员接受的平均有效剂量相对较高。尽管由于政府政策,新冠疫情期间的工作量较低,但疫情期间医护人员的辐射剂量与疫情之前相似。