• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国不同种族/族裔参与非小细胞肺癌临床试验的情况。

Participation in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trials in the United States by Race/Ethnicity.

作者信息

Wheeler Meghann, Karanth Shama, Divaker Joel, Yoon Hyung-Suk, Yang Jae Jeong, Ratcliffe Maisey, Blair Marissa, Mehta Hiren J, Rackauskas Mindaugas, Braithwaite Dejana

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32603.

Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610; University of Florida Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.

出版信息

Clin Lung Cancer. 2025 Jan;26(1):52-57.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2024.09.009
PMID:39462747
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite efforts by Cancer Centers and community organizations to increase diversity in clinical trials, significant racial/ethnic disparities remain. Given the high mortality rates in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is important to increase diversity in NSCLC trials, ensuring all patients benefit from advances in new treatment modalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the distribution of racial/ethnic minority enrollment in NSCLC clinical trials using data from ClinicalTrials.gov. We extracted trial characteristics, including start year, study phase, tumor stage, sample size, sponsor, geographic region, and masking. The number of participants by race/ethnicity was obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov or linked publications. Using annual NSCLC incidence data from SEER*Stat for each racial/ethnic group from 2010 to 2019, we applied a 2-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction to assess differences between incidence and trial participation.

RESULTS

A total of 147 unique studies were included in the final analysis. Of the 28,540 participants, 79.6% were White, with 3% Black, 10.4% Asian or Pacific Islander and 3.4% Hispanic/Latino. Most participants were enrolled in phase III trials (63.8%), industry-sponsored (93.9%), and open-label (67.7%). Black patients were more commonly enrolled in academic sponsored trials and less commonly enrolled in masked (i.e., blinded) studies. When comparing trial participation to annual incidence data, we observed underrepresentation among Black participants (Difference: -7.9%) and Hispanic/Latino participants (Difference: -3.2%).

CONCLUSION

Persistent underrepresentation exists in NSCLC clinical trials among Black and Hispanic/Latino patients. We urge further investigation of these findings through well-designed clinical trials among diverse patient populations.

摘要

引言

尽管癌症中心和社区组织努力提高临床试验的多样性,但显著的种族/族裔差异仍然存在。鉴于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的高死亡率,增加NSCLC试验的多样性很重要,以确保所有患者都能从新治疗模式的进展中受益。

材料与方法

我们使用ClinicalTrials.gov的数据评估了NSCLC临床试验中种族/族裔少数群体入组情况的分布。我们提取了试验特征,包括开始年份、研究阶段、肿瘤分期、样本量、申办者、地理区域和设盲情况。按种族/族裔划分的参与者数量来自ClinicalTrials.gov或相关出版物。利用2010年至2019年SEER*Stat针对每个种族/族裔群体的年度NSCLC发病率数据,我们应用了带有连续性校正的两样本比例相等性检验,以评估发病率与试验参与率之间的差异。

结果

最终分析共纳入147项独特研究。在28540名参与者中,79.6%为白人,3%为黑人,10.4%为亚裔或太平洋岛民,3.4%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。大多数参与者参加III期试验(63.8%),由行业赞助(93.9%),且为开放标签试验(67.7%)。黑人患者更常参加学术赞助的试验,较少参加设盲(即双盲)研究。在将试验参与情况与年度发病率数据进行比较时,我们发现黑人参与者(差异:-7.9%)和西班牙裔/拉丁裔参与者(差异:-3.2%)的入组率不足。

结论

NSCLC临床试验中黑人及西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者的入组率持续不足。我们敦促通过针对不同患者群体精心设计的临床试验对这些发现进行进一步调查。

相似文献

1
Participation in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trials in the United States by Race/Ethnicity.美国不同种族/族裔参与非小细胞肺癌临床试验的情况。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2025 Jan;26(1):52-57.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
2
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.种族和民族在原发性开角型青光眼临床试验中的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8348.
3
Gender, race, and ethnicity in lung cancer clinical trial participation: Analysis of 253,845 patients from 2002 to 2021.肺癌临床试验参与中的性别、种族和民族:对2002年至2021年253,845名患者的分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 May;169(5):1346-1353.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.040. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
4
Evaluating machine learning model bias and racial disparities in non-small cell lung cancer using SEER registry data.利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记数据评估非小细胞肺癌中机器学习模型的偏差和种族差异。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2024 Dec;27(4):631-649. doi: 10.1007/s10729-024-09691-6. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
5
Participation of Patients From Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups in Phase 1 Early Cancer Drug Development Trials in the US, 2000-2018.2000-2018 年美国少数族裔患者参与早期癌症药物研发临床试验的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2239884. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.39884.
6
Assessment of the Inclusion of Racial/Ethnic Minority, Female, and Older Individuals in Vaccine Clinical Trials.评估种族/少数民族、女性和老年人在疫苗临床试验中的纳入情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037640. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37640.
7
Are orthopedic clinical trials representative? An analysis of race and ethnicity reported in clinical trials between 2007 and 2022 : Running title: representation of clinical trials in orthopedic surgery.骨科临床试验是否具有代表性?对 2007 年至 2022 年期间报告的临床试验中种族和民族的分析:标题:骨科手术临床试验的代表性。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):1977-1987. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05285-7. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
8
Increasing diversity in clinical trials: demographic trends at the National Cancer Institute, 2005-2020.临床试验中的多样性增加:2005 年至 2020 年美国国家癌症研究所的人口趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jul 1;116(7):1063-1071. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae018.
9
Race and Ethnicity Representation in Phase 2/3 Oncology Clinical Trial Publications: A Systematic Review.种族和民族在 2/3 期肿瘤临床试验出版物中的代表性:一项系统评价。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241388. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1388.
10
National enrollment of lung cancer clinical trials is disproportionate based on race and health care access.国家对肺癌临床试验的参与程度存在差异,这种差异与种族和医疗保健可及性有关。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Oct;168(4):1235-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.12.012. Epub 2023 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
KRAS mutated NSCLC: past, present, and future directions in a rapidly evolving landscape.KRAS 突变的非小细胞肺癌:快速演变格局中的过去、现在与未来方向
Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf153.
2
Molecular Diagnosis, Clinical Trial Representation, and Precision Medicine in Minority Patients with Oncogene-Driven Lung Cancer.分子诊断、临床试验表征与癌基因驱动肺癌少数族裔患者的精准医学
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;17(12):1950. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121950.
3
Equity and Opportunities in Lung Cancer Care-Addressing Disparities, Challenges, and Pathways Forward.
肺癌护理中的公平性与机会——应对差异、挑战及未来路径
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;17(8):1347. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081347.
4
The value of real-world evidence in supporting targeted therapies for patients with rare oncogenic drivers in mNSCLC.真实世界证据在支持mNSCLC中具有罕见致癌驱动因素患者的靶向治疗方面的价值。
Future Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(9):1005-1011. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2475728. Epub 2025 Mar 14.