Takamizawa Kei, Gohbara Masaomi, Hanajima Yohei, Tsutsumi Katsuhiko, Kirigaya Hidekuni, Kirigaya Jin, Nakahashi Hidefumi, Minamimoto Yugo, Kimura Yuichiro, Kawaura Noriyuki, Matsushita Kensuke, Okada Kozo, Konishi Masaaki, Iwahashi Noriaki, Kosuge Masami, Sugano Teruyasu, Ebina Toshiaki, Hibi Kiyoshi
Division of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Jan;40(1):57-67. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01059-5. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is typically performed by experienced operators. Therefore, the safety of pPCI for STEMI performed by less experienced operators with the support of experienced operators remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of pPCI for STEMI performed by less experienced operators with the support of experienced operators. In total, 775 STEMI patients were enrolled and divided into groups according to operator experience in PCI: less experienced (n = 384) and experienced (n = 391) operator groups. Experienced operators were defined as those who had performed > 50 elective PCI procedures per year as the first operator or instructional assistant, whereas less experienced operators were defined as others. When less experienced operators performed the pPCI, experienced operators supported them. The primary endpoint was any cardiovascular event, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned hospitalization for heart failure. In the propensity score-matched analysis, 324 patients were included in each group. The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint over a median of 5 years in the less experienced operator group was similar to that in the experienced operator group (15% vs. 18%, P = 0.209). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, there was no excess risk for patients operated upon by less experienced operators for the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.25; P = 0.417). pPCI for STEMI by less experienced operators did not increase the risk of in-hospital mortality or 5-year long-term cardiovascular events if supported by experienced operators.
ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)通常由经验丰富的操作人员进行。因此,在经验丰富的操作人员支持下,经验较少的操作人员进行STEMI的pPCI安全性仍不明确。我们旨在研究在经验丰富的操作人员支持下,经验较少的操作人员进行STEMI的pPCI的长期结果。总共纳入了775例STEMI患者,并根据PCI操作人员的经验将其分为两组:经验较少组(n = 384)和经验丰富组(n = 391)。经验丰富的操作人员定义为每年作为第一操作者或指导助手进行超过50例择期PCI手术的人员,而经验较少的操作人员则定义为其他人员。当经验较少的操作人员进行pPCI时,经验丰富的操作人员会给予支持。主要终点是任何心血管事件,定义为心血管死亡、非致命性心肌梗死和因心力衰竭而计划外住院的综合结果。在倾向评分匹配分析中,每组纳入324例患者。经验较少的操作人员组在中位5年期间主要终点的累积发生率与经验丰富的操作人员组相似(15%对18%,P = 0.209)。在多变量Cox比例风险模型中,经验较少的操作人员进行手术的患者在主要终点方面没有额外风险(调整后的风险比为0.85;95%置信区间为0.58 - 1.25;P = 0.417)。如果有经验丰富的操作人员支持,经验较少的操作人员进行STEMI的pPCI不会增加住院死亡率或5年长期心血管事件的风险。