Thüs Dominik, Malone Sarah, Brünken Roland
Department of Education, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 11;15:1474892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474892. eCollection 2024.
This study explores the implementation and evaluation of OwlMentor, an AI-powered learning environment designed to assist university students in comprehending scientific texts. OwlMentor was developed participatorily and then integrated into a course, with development and evaluation taking place over two semesters. It offers features like document-based chats, automatic question generation, and quiz creation.
We used the Technology Acceptance Model to assess system acceptance, examined learning outcomes, and explored the influence of general self-efficacy on system acceptance and OwlMentor use.
The results indicated complex relationships between perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and actual use, suggesting the need for more dynamic models of system acceptance. Although no direct correlation between OwlMentor use and learning gains was found, descriptive results indicated higher gains among users compared to non-users. Additionally, general self-efficacy was strongly related to perceived usefulness, intention to use, and actual use of the system.
These findings highlight the importance of aligning AI tools with students' needs and existing learning strategies to maximize their educational benefits.
本研究探讨了OwlMentor的实施与评估情况。OwlMentor是一个由人工智能驱动的学习环境,旨在帮助大学生理解科学文本。OwlMentor是通过参与式开发的,然后被整合到一门课程中,开发和评估过程持续了两个学期。它提供了基于文档的聊天、自动生成问题和创建测验等功能。
我们使用技术接受模型来评估系统接受度,检查学习成果,并探讨一般自我效能感对系统接受度和OwlMentor使用的影响。
结果表明,感知易用性、感知有用性和实际使用之间存在复杂的关系,这表明需要更动态的系统接受模型。虽然未发现使用OwlMentor与学习成绩之间存在直接关联,但描述性结果表明,与未使用者相比,使用者的成绩提高幅度更大。此外,一般自我效能感与系统的感知有用性、使用意愿和实际使用密切相关。
这些发现凸显了使人工智能工具与学生需求及现有学习策略保持一致以最大化其教育效益的重要性。