• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Differential Item Functioning on Computer Adaptive Testing Under Different Conditions.不同条件下项目功能差异对计算机自适应测试的影响。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Nov;48(7-8):303-322. doi: 10.1177/01466216241284295. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
2
Does a Concise Patient-reported Outcome Measure Provide a Valid Measure of Physical Function for Cancer Patients After Lower Extremity Surgery?一种简明的患者报告结局指标能否有效衡量下肢手术后癌症患者的身体功能?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):62-75. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003257. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
3
Measurement properties of the Dutch-Flemish patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function item bank and instruments: a systematic review.荷兰-佛兰德斯患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)物理功能项目库和工具的测量特性:系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 24;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01647-y.
4
Measurement of level of PTSD with the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ): bias and precision when using full ordinal or dichotomized items.使用国际创伤问卷(ITQ)测量创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)水平:使用完整有序项目或二分项目时的偏差和精密度。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2514873. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2514873. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
5
Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Berg Balance Scale Improves Measurement Efficiency Without Compromising Precision in People With Stroke.计算机化自适应测试用于 Berg 平衡量表在不影响精度的情况下提高脑卒中患者的测量效率。
Phys Ther. 2024 Nov 1;104(11). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae112.
6
Further refinement of the Patient-Reported Impact of Dermatological Diseases (PRIDD) measure using classical test theory and item response theory.进一步使用经典测试理论和项目反应理论细化皮肤病患者报告的影响(PRIDD)测量。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Apr 17;190(5):718-728. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad487.
7
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
8
Detecting DIF with the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Model: Lord's Chi-square and IPR-NCDIF Methods.使用多维度成对偏好模型检测差异项目功能:洛德卡方检验和IPR-NCDIF方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2025 Jul 1:01466216251351949. doi: 10.1177/01466216251351949.
9
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic- and Transformer-Based Automatic Item Generation: A Critical Review.基于自动和Transformer的自动试题生成:批判性综述
J Intell. 2025 Aug 12;13(8):102. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13080102.

本文引用的文献

1
Detecting uniform differential item functioning for continuous response computerized adaptive testing.检测连续作答计算机自适应测试中的均匀差异项目功能。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Mar;48(1-2):18-37. doi: 10.1177/01466216241227544. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
Using Odds Ratios to Detect Differential Item Functioning.使用优势比来检测项目功能差异
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Nov;42(8):613-629. doi: 10.1177/0146621618762738. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
3
Conducting simulation studies for computerized adaptive testing using SimulCAT: an instructional piece.使用SimulCAT进行计算机自适应测试的模拟研究:一篇指导性文章。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:20. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.20. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
Detection of differential item functioning in Rasch models by boosting techniques.通过增强技术检测Rasch模型中的项目功能差异
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2016 Feb;69(1):80-103. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12060. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
5
A penalty approach to differential item functioning in Rasch models.拉施模型中项目功能差异的惩罚方法。
Psychometrika. 2015 Mar;80(1):21-43. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9377-6. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
6
Multidimensional Adaptive Testing with Optimal Design Criteria for Item Selection.具有项目选择最优设计标准的多维自适应测试。
Psychometrika. 2009 Jun;74(2):273-296. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9097-5. Epub 2008 Dec 23.

不同条件下项目功能差异对计算机自适应测试的影响。

Effect of Differential Item Functioning on Computer Adaptive Testing Under Different Conditions.

作者信息

Sahin Kursad Merve, Yalcin Seher

机构信息

TED University, Turkey.

Ankara University, Turkey.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Nov;48(7-8):303-322. doi: 10.1177/01466216241284295. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1177/01466216241284295
PMID:39464740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11501093/
Abstract

This study provides an overview of the effect of differential item functioning (DIF) on measurement precision, test information function (TIF), and test effectiveness in computer adaptive tests (CATs). Simulated data for the study was produced and analyzed with the Rstudio. During the data generation process, item pool size, DIF type, DIF percentage, item selection method for CAT, and the test termination rules were considered changed conditions. Sample size and ability parameter distribution, Item Response Theory (IRT) model, DIF size, ability estimation method, test starting rule, and item usage frequency method regarding CAT conditions were considered fixed conditions. To examine the effect of DIF, measurement precision, TIF and test effectiveness were calculated. Results show DIF has negative effects on measurement precision, TIF, and test effectiveness. In particular, statistically significant effects of the percentage DIF items and DIF type are observed on measurement precision.

摘要

本研究概述了项目功能差异(DIF)对计算机自适应测试(CAT)中测量精度、测试信息函数(TIF)和测试有效性的影响。使用Rstudio生成并分析了该研究的模拟数据。在数据生成过程中,将题库大小、DIF类型、DIF百分比、CAT的项目选择方法以及测试终止规则视为变化条件。将样本大小和能力参数分布、项目反应理论(IRT)模型、DIF大小、能力估计方法、测试起始规则以及关于CAT条件的项目使用频率方法视为固定条件。为了检验DIF的影响,计算了测量精度、TIF和测试有效性。结果表明,DIF对测量精度、TIF和测试有效性有负面影响。特别是,观察到DIF项目百分比和DIF类型对测量精度有统计学上的显著影响。