Evaluation of problem-based learning for pharmacology based on a comprehensive analysis in undergraduate students.

BACKGROUND

Problem-based learning (PBL) has been widely employed in pharmacology teaching. However, the benefits of PBL for undergraduate students have not been clearly demonstrated. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of PBL and lecture-based learning (LBL) in undergraduate pharmacology education.

METHODS

We systematically searched literature databases for comparative studies related to PBL pedagogy in the undergraduate pharmacology curriculum from the inception of the databases to December 2023. The obtained literature was screened according to the selection criteria, and Review Manager 5.4 was used for the meta-analysis of the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 33 comparative studies involving 4425 undergraduate students were enrolled. The standardized mean differences (95% confidence intervals) of the examination scores and students' self-rated scores on learning interest, comprehension of knowledge and thinking ability between PBL and LBL were calculated to be 2.03 (1.53-2.53), 0.50 (0.26-0.74), 0.69 (0.46-0.92), and 1.65 (1.21-2.09), respectively. The risk ratios of the proportion of satisfaction on improving students' learning interest, comprehension of knowledge, thinking ability, self-study ability, and communication skills were calculated to be 2.08 (1.17-3.71), 1.84 (1.26-2.67), 1.42 (1.19-1.69), 1.44 (1.16-1.79), and 1.66 (1.22-2.27), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence indicates that PBL is more effective than LBL in improving examination scores and student satisfaction in undergraduate pharmacology education.