• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of m-Endo LES, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of total coliform bacteria in water.用于水中总大肠菌群细菌膜过滤计数的m-Endo LES培养基、麦康凯培养基和替波尔培养基的比较
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Sep;38(3):351-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.3.351-358.1979.
2
Evaluation of standard and modified M-FC, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of fecal coliforms in water.评估标准和改良的M-FC培养基、麦康凯培养基和替波尔培养基用于水中粪大肠菌群的膜过滤计数。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Aug;42(2):192-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.2.192-199.1981.
3
Study on the efficiency of four procedures for enumerating coliforms in water.水中大肠菌群四种计数方法的效率研究。
Can J Microbiol. 1976 May;22(5):630-5. doi: 10.1139/m76-093.
4
Comparison of media for enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in non-disinfected water.用于非消毒水中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌计数的培养基比较
J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Mar;68(3):522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.10.007. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
5
New medium for improved recovery of coliform bacteria from drinking water.用于从饮用水中更好地回收大肠菌群细菌的新型培养基。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Feb;45(2):484-92. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.2.484-492.1983.
6
Evaluation of two media and different plating techniques for enumeration of thermotolerant coliforms in river water.评估两种培养基及不同平板接种技术用于河水中耐热大肠菌群计数的效果。
Rev Latinoam Microbiol. 2001 Apr-Jun;43(2):84-7.
7
Injured coliforms in drinking water.饮用水中受损的大肠菌群。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jan;51(1):1-5. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.1.1-5.1986.
8
Evaluation of the lactose Tergitol-7, m-Endo LES, Colilert 18, Readycult Coliforms 100, Water-Check-100, 3M Petrifilm EC and DryCult Coliform test methods for detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water samples.评估乳糖-特吉托7、m-内毒素检测法、Colilert 18、Readycult大肠菌群100、Water-Check-100、3M Petrifilm EC和DryCult大肠菌群检测方法用于检测水样中的总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌。
Water Res. 2006 Oct;40(17):3249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.024. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
9
Comparison of methods for determining the numbers and species distribution of coliform bacteria in well water samples.井水样本中大肠菌群细菌数量及种类分布测定方法的比较
J Appl Microbiol. 2001 Jun;90(6):850-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01314.x.
10
Comparison of MacConkey broth, Teepol broth and glutamic acid media for the enumeration of coliform organisms in water by the Public Health Laboratory Service Standing Committee on the Bacteriological Examination of Water Supplies.公共卫生实验室服务处供水细菌学检查常务委员会对用于水中大肠菌群计数的麦康凯肉汤、特波尔肉汤和谷氨酸培养基的比较。
J Hyg (Lond). 1968 Mar;66(1):67-82. doi: 10.1017/s002217240004095x.

引用本文的文献

1
A downstream process control tool based on the redox dye resazurin for rapid and accurate measurement of microbial metabolic activity.一种基于氧化还原染料 Resazurin 的下游工艺控制工具,用于快速准确地测量微生物代谢活性。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2023 Sep;415(22):5539-5550. doi: 10.1007/s00216-023-04828-y. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
2
The importance of water quality in classifying basic water services: The case of Ethiopia, SDG6.1, and safe drinking water.水质在基本水服务分类中的重要性:以埃塞俄比亚、SDG6.1 和安全饮用水为例。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0248944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248944. eCollection 2021.
3
Bacteriostatic impact of nanoscale zero-valent iron against pathogenic bacteria in the municipal wastewater.纳米零价铁对城市污水中病原菌的抑菌作用
Biologia (Bratisl). 2021;76(9):2785-2809. doi: 10.1007/s11756-021-00814-w. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
4
Aeromonas sobria in chlorinated drinking water supplies.在氯化饮用水供应中的温和气单胞菌。
Microb Ecol. 1982 Dec;8(4):325-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02010672.
5
A model for the density ofAeromonas hydrophila in Albemarle Sound, North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州阿尔伯马尔湾气单胞菌密度模型。
Microb Ecol. 1983 Jul;9(2):137-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02015127.
6
Differential susceptibility of aeromonads and coliforms to cefsulodin.气单胞菌属和大肠菌群对头孢磺啶的敏感性差异
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Jun;62(6):1885-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.6.1885-1888.1996.
7
Comparison of nine brands of membrane filter and the most-probable-number methods for total coliform enumeration in sewage-contaminated drinking water.九种品牌的膜滤器与最可能数法用于污水污染饮用水中总大肠菌群计数的比较。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Aug;40(2):186-91. doi: 10.1128/aem.40.2.186-191.1980.
8
Influence of diluents, media, and membrane filters on detection fo injured waterborne coliform bacteria.稀释剂、培养基和膜过滤器对受伤的水传播大肠菌群细菌检测的影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jan;43(1):97-103. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.1.97-103.1982.
9
Evaluation of standard and modified M-FC, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of fecal coliforms in water.评估标准和改良的M-FC培养基、麦康凯培养基和替波尔培养基用于水中粪大肠菌群的膜过滤计数。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Aug;42(2):192-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.2.192-199.1981.
10
Impact of verification media and resuscitation on accuracy of the membrane filter total coliform enumeration technique.验证介质和复苏对膜滤法总大肠菌群计数技术准确性的影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 May;41(5):1144-51. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.5.1144-1151.1981.

本文引用的文献

1
Aeromonas distribution and survival in a thermally altered lake.气单胞菌在受热改变的湖泊中的分布和存活情况。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Jan;33(1):114-22. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.1.114-122.1977.
2
Mathematical analysis of the API enteric 20 profile register using a computer diagnostic model.使用计算机诊断模型对20种肠溶活性成分剖析图进行数学分析。
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Oct;28(4):691-5. doi: 10.1128/am.28.4.691-695.1974.
3
Evaluation of coliform tests for chlorinated secondary effluents.氯化二级出水大肠菌群检测评估
J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1973 Mar;45(1):498-506.
4
Gram-negative water bacteria in hemodialysis systems.血液透析系统中的革兰氏阴性水生细菌。
Health Lab Sci. 1975 Oct;12(4):321-34.
5
Coliphage interference in the recovery of coliform bacteria.
J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1976 Mar;48(3 pt 1):533-9.
6
A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.两种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的商业方法(API 20E和Enterotube)与传统方法的比较。
J Clin Pathol. 1976 Feb;29(2):158-61. doi: 10.1136/jcp.29.2.158.
7
Study on the efficiency of four procedures for enumerating coliforms in water.水中大肠菌群四种计数方法的效率研究。
Can J Microbiol. 1976 May;22(5):630-5. doi: 10.1139/m76-093.
8
Isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica from surface and well waters in Ontario.从安大略省的地表水和井水分离出小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌。
Can J Microbiol. 1978 Sep;24(9):1048-52. doi: 10.1139/m78-173.
9
The occurrence of Pseudomonas spp. in surface water and in tap water as determined on citrate media.在柠檬酸盐培养基上测定的地表水和自来水中假单胞菌属的存在情况。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1977;43(2):187-97. doi: 10.1007/BF00395673.
10
Techniques for the assessment of growth of micro-organisms on plumbing materials used in contact with potable water supplies.
J Appl Bacteriol. 1977 Aug;43(1):137-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1977.tb00732.x.

用于水中总大肠菌群细菌膜过滤计数的m-Endo LES培养基、麦康凯培养基和替波尔培养基的比较

Comparison of m-Endo LES, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of total coliform bacteria in water.

作者信息

Grabow W O, du Preez M

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Sep;38(3):351-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.3.351-358.1979.

DOI:10.1128/aem.38.3.351-358.1979
PMID:394678
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC243498/
Abstract

Total coliform counts obtained by means of standard membrane filtration techniques, using MacConkey agar, m-Endo LES agar, Teepol agar, and pads saturated with Teepol broth as growth media, were compared. Various combinations of these media were used in tests on 490 samples of river water and city wastewater after different stages of conventional purification and reclamation processes including lime treatment, and filtration, active carbon treatment, ozonation, and chlorination. Endo agar yielded the highest average counts for all these samples. Teepol agar generally had higher counts then Teepol broth, whereas MacConkey agar had the lowest average counts. Identification of 871 positive isolates showed that Aeromonas hydrophila was the species most commonly detected. Species of Escherichia, Citrobacter, Klebsiella, and Enterobacter represented 55% of isolates which conformed to the definition of total coliforms on Endo agar, 54% on Teepol agar, and 45% on MacConkey agar. Selection for species on the media differed considerably. Evaluation of these data and literature on alternative tests, including most probable number methods, indicated that the technique of choice for routine analysis of total coliform bacteria in drinking water is membrane filtration using m-Endo LES agar as growth medium without enrichment procedures or a cytochrome oxidase restriction.

摘要

比较了通过标准膜过滤技术,使用麦康凯琼脂、m - 远藤LES琼脂、替波尔琼脂以及用替波尔肉汤饱和的垫作为生长培养基获得的总大肠菌群数。这些培养基的各种组合用于对490个河水和城市污水样本进行测试,这些样本经过了常规净化和回收过程的不同阶段,包括石灰处理、过滤、活性炭处理、臭氧化和氯化。远藤琼脂对所有这些样本产生的平均计数最高。替波尔琼脂的计数通常高于替波尔肉汤,而麦康凯琼脂的平均计数最低。对871个阳性分离株的鉴定表明,嗜水气单胞菌是最常检测到的物种。大肠埃希氏菌、柠檬酸杆菌、克雷伯氏菌和肠杆菌属的物种占符合远藤琼脂上总大肠菌群定义的分离株的55%,替波尔琼脂上为54%,麦康凯琼脂上为45%。在这些培养基上对物种的选择有很大差异。对这些数据以及包括最可能数法在内的替代测试的文献评估表明,饮用水中总大肠菌群细菌常规分析的首选技术是使用m - 远藤LES琼脂作为生长培养基且无需富集程序或细胞色素氧化酶限制的膜过滤法。