Dutkaand B J, Tobin S E
Can J Microbiol. 1976 May;22(5):630-5. doi: 10.1139/m76-093.
Four coliform estimation procedures were compared as to their ability to enumerate coliform bacteria (oxidase-negative lactose fermenters) from sewage, effluent, and various fresh waters in the lower Great Lakes Region of Canada. Two of the procedures used and which are cited in the American Public Health Association (APHA) Standard Methods were a most probable number (MPN) technique using lauryltryptose broth (LST) and brilliant green bile 2% broth (BGB), and a membrane filtration (MF) technique using m Endo agar LES. The other two procedures were an MPN technique using Parhad chemically defined synthetic medium (PCDS) and BGB developed for Indian fresh waters and an MF (mC agar) technique developed for seawater. Data indicate that within the survey area, maximum population estimates were achieved by the MF procedure using m Endo agar LES and that each procedure was selective for different genera of the Enterobacteriaceae. Discussions concerning standard versus reference procedures are presented.
对四种大肠菌群估计程序进行了比较,以评估它们从加拿大五大湖地区下游的污水、废水和各种淡水中计数大肠菌群细菌(氧化酶阴性乳糖发酵菌)的能力。所使用的且在美国公共卫生协会(APHA)标准方法中引用的两种程序,一种是使用月桂基色氨酸肉汤(LST)和2%煌绿胆汁肉汤(BGB)的最可能数(MPN)技术,另一种是使用m Endo琼脂LES的膜过滤(MF)技术。另外两种程序,一种是使用为印度淡水开发的帕尔哈德化学定义合成培养基(PCDS)和BGB的MPN技术,另一种是为海水开发的MF(mC琼脂)技术。数据表明,在调查区域内,使用m Endo琼脂LES的MF程序实现了最大种群估计数,并且每种程序对肠杆菌科的不同属具有选择性。文中还讨论了标准程序与参考程序的相关问题。