Suppr超能文献

休闲屏幕时间与糖尿病视网膜病变风险:一项孟德尔随机化研究。

Leisure screen time and diabetic retinopathy risk: A Mendelian randomization study.

机构信息

Department of Nephroendocrinology, Guang'an People's Hospital, Guan'an, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 25;103(43):e40099. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040099.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether leisure screen time (LST) increases the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) using the Mendelian randomization (MR). This study employed a two-sample MR analysis, utilizing 63 single-nucleotide polymorphisms as instrumental variables (IVs) to assess the causal relationship between LST and the risk of Dr. To ensure the robustness of the results, a multi-effect test was conducted to evaluate the validity of the IVs. Additionally, heterogeneity tests were performed to explore differences among sub-samples. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to further validate our findings. The impact of LST on the risk of DR was observed in both inverse variance weighted (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.43, P = 1.38 × 10-2) and weighted median (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.05-1.61, P = 1.46 × 10-2) analyses. However, the MR-Egger method (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.32-1.36, P = .273) did not find an increased risk of DR with increased LST. The pleiotropy test yielded a P-value of P = .09. Heterogeneity tests showed that the Q value for the inverse variance weighted method was 71.39 with a P-value of 0.17, indicating no significant heterogeneity. These results suggest that the IVs might be appropriate, and the analysis results could be robust. A large-scale MR analysis suggests a causal relationship between LST and the risk of Dr.

摘要

本研究旨在采用孟德尔随机化(MR)方法,探讨休闲屏幕时间(LST)是否会增加糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的风险。本研究采用两样本 MR 分析,使用 63 个单核苷酸多态性作为工具变量(IVs),评估 LST 与 Dr 风险之间的因果关系。为确保结果的稳健性,进行了多效性检验,以评估 IVs 的有效性。此外,还进行了异质性检验,以探讨亚样本之间的差异。还进行了敏感性分析,以进一步验证我们的发现。在逆方差加权(比值比 [OR]:1.22,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.04-1.43,P=1.38×10-2)和加权中位数(OR:1.30,95%CI:1.05-1.61,P=1.46×10-2)分析中,均观察到 LST 对 DR 风险的影响。然而,MR-Egger 方法(OR:0.66,95%CI:0.32-1.36,P=0.273)并未发现 LST 增加与 DR 风险增加之间存在关联。多效性检验的 P 值为 P=0.09。异质性检验显示,逆方差加权法的 Q 值为 71.39,P 值为 0.17,表明无显著异质性。这些结果表明,IVs 可能是合适的,分析结果可能是稳健的。一项大规模的 MR 分析表明,LST 与 Dr 风险之间存在因果关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验