• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网页应用程序辅助非皮肤科医生学习和管理常见皮肤药物不良反应患者:一项多中心随机对照试验。

Web application for assisting non-dermatology physicians in learning and managing patients with common cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Informatics Innovation Center of Excellence, School of Informatics, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat.

Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2422573. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2422573. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1080/07853890.2024.2422573
PMID:39473307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11533240/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) remain a challenge for non-dermatologists. Medical-related applications to assist in learning about and managing patients with CADRs are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a web application for non-dermatologists in managing CADRs by comparing the knowledge scores of users and non-users.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted between January 2023 and May 2023. Clinician participants were randomized (1:1) into the application and control groups using a simple randomization method. Knowledge scores between the groups were compared to evaluate the efficacy of the web application, and participants' perspectives on the application were also collected.

RESULTS

A total of 44 clinician participants were included in the final analysis. The median age was 33.0 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 27.5-35.0) and predominantly female (56.8%). The score in the application group (median, 27.0; 95% CI, 25.0-28.0) was significantly higher than that in the control group (median, 14.0; 95% CI 13.0-17.0) ( < 0.001). There were no differences in scores between the sex groups ( = 0.695), between general practitioners (GPs) and non-GPs ( = 0.93), or among groups with different frequencies of evaluation of patients with CADRs ( = 0.266). In addition, the participants in the application group rated a high level of overall satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The web application for CADRs is an effective and convenient tool for assisting non-dermatologist physicians in learning and providing initial management with a high level of satisfaction. However, prospective long-term randomized controlled studies are required to confirm the efficacy of this tool.

摘要

背景

皮肤药物不良反应(CADR)仍然是对非皮肤科医生的挑战。用于帮助了解和管理 CADR 患者的医学相关应用程序很少。我们旨在通过比较用户和非用户的知识评分来评估该应用程序对非皮肤科医生管理 CADR 的效果。

材料和方法

2023 年 1 月至 5 月进行了一项多中心随机对照试验。使用简单随机化方法将临床医生参与者随机(1:1)分配到应用程序组和对照组。比较两组之间的知识评分,以评估网络应用程序的效果,并收集参与者对该应用程序的看法。

结果

共有 44 名临床医生参与了最终分析。中位数年龄为 33.0 岁(95%置信区间(CI)27.5-35.0),女性居多(56.8%)。应用程序组的分数(中位数,27.0;95%CI,25.0-28.0)明显高于对照组(中位数,14.0;95%CI,13.0-17.0)( < 0.001)。在性别组之间( = 0.695)、全科医生(GP)和非 GP 之间( = 0.93)或评估 CADR 患者频率不同的组之间( = 0.266),分数均无差异。此外,应用程序组的参与者对整体满意度评价较高。

结论

CADR 网络应用程序是一种有效且方便的工具,可帮助非皮肤科医生学习并提供初步管理,满意度较高。但是,需要进行前瞻性长期随机对照研究来确认该工具的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d9/11533240/9486bfd4d990/IANN_A_2422573_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d9/11533240/fdd2761418ca/IANN_A_2422573_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d9/11533240/aa996b8ea6fc/IANN_A_2422573_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d9/11533240/2e84c6bfec77/IANN_A_2422573_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d9/11533240/9486bfd4d990/IANN_A_2422573_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d9/11533240/fdd2761418ca/IANN_A_2422573_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d9/11533240/aa996b8ea6fc/IANN_A_2422573_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d9/11533240/2e84c6bfec77/IANN_A_2422573_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d9/11533240/9486bfd4d990/IANN_A_2422573_F0004_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Web application for assisting non-dermatology physicians in learning and managing patients with common cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.网页应用程序辅助非皮肤科医生学习和管理常见皮肤药物不良反应患者:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2422573. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2422573. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Clinical profile of cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a retrospective study of 1883 hospitalized patients from 2007 to 2016 in Shanghai, China.中国上海 2007 年至 2016 年 1883 例住院患者皮肤不良反应的临床特征:一项回顾性研究。
Eur J Dermatol. 2020 Feb 1;30(1):24-31. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2020.3713.
3
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions with fixed-dose combinations: Special reference to self-medication and preventability.固定剂量复方制剂引起的皮肤药物不良反应:特别提及自我药疗及可预防性
Indian J Pharmacol. 2018 Jul-Aug;50(4):192-196. doi: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_760_16.
4
Sex Differences in the Risk of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Induced by Antiseizure Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.抗癫痫药物引起的皮肤不良反应风险的性别差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CNS Drugs. 2021 Feb;35(2):161-176. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00794-0. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (CADRs)-Statistical Analysis of the Causal Relationship between the Drug, Comorbidities, Cofactors, and the Cutaneous Reaction-A Single-Centered Study.皮肤药物不良反应(CADR)-药物、合并症、伴随因素与皮肤反应之间因果关系的统计分析-单中心研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):7982. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137982.
6
Prospective Analysis of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Encountered in a Tertiary Care Hospital.三级护理医院中皮肤药物不良反应的前瞻性分析
Cureus. 2024 Jul 24;16(7):e65284. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65284. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Trends in culprit drugs and clinical entities in cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a retrospective study.皮肤药物不良反应中致病药物及临床实体的趋势:一项回顾性研究。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2017 Dec;36(4):370-376. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2017.1301947. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
8
Oral Antibiotics and Risk of Serious Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions.口服抗生素与严重皮肤不良药物反应风险。
JAMA. 2024 Sep 3;332(9):730-737. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.11437.
9
A Study of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions at a Tertiary Care Center in Andhra Pradesh, India.印度安得拉邦一家三级医疗中心的皮肤药物不良反应研究。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 14;15(4):e37596. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37596. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
Association of HLA-A*31:01 Screening With the Incidence of Carbamazepine-Induced Cutaneous Adverse Reactions in a Japanese Population.HLA-A*31:01 筛查与日本人群中卡马西平诱导的皮肤不良反应发生率的关联。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jul 1;75(7):842-849. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0278.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug-Induced Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions: Insights Into Clinical Presentation, Immunopathogenesis, Diagnostic Methods, Treatment, and Pharmacogenomics.药物性严重皮肤不良反应:对临床表现、免疫发病机制、诊断方法、治疗及药物基因组学的见解
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 20;13:832048. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.832048. eCollection 2022.
2
New diagnostic and imaging technologies in dermatology.皮肤科的新型诊断与成像技术。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Dec;20(12):3782-3787. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14499. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
3
Continuing Medical Education and Lifelong Learning.
继续医学教育和终身学习。
Surg Clin North Am. 2021 Aug;101(4):703-715. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2021.05.015.
4
What is AI? Applications of artificial intelligence to dermatology.什么是人工智能?人工智能在皮肤病学中的应用。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Sep;183(3):423-430. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18880. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
5
Medical education: giving feedback to doctors in training.医学教育:向实习医生提供反馈。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 19;366:l4523. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4523.
6
Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology-Where We Are and the Way to the Future: A Review.人工智能在皮肤科领域的应用——现状与未来展望:综述。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Feb;21(1):41-47. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00462-6.
7
Evaluating a mobile application for improving clinical laboratory test ordering and diagnosis.评估一款用于改善临床实验室检验申请和诊断的移动应用程序。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jul 1;25(7):841-847. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy026.
8
'Is it worth doing?' Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research.“这值得做吗?”衡量患者及公众参与研究的影响。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jul 31;1:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0008-5. eCollection 2015.
9
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs.药物严重皮肤不良反应。
Lancet. 2017 Oct 28;390(10106):1996-2011. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30378-6. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
Feedback for Learners in Medical Education: What Is Known? A Scoping Review.医学教育中对学习者的反馈:已知情况如何?一项范围综述。
Acad Med. 2017 Sep;92(9):1346-1354. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001578.