Fraipont Genevieve M, Beyer Ryan S, McGarry Michelle H, Lee Thay Q
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, CA, USA.
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Jul 20;4(4):668-675. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.06.009. eCollection 2024 Nov.
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the available literature on the biomechanical characteristics of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint to identify trends in translational parameters and contributions of the various ligamentous structures supporting the joint.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases until October 2023 to identify articles reporting on the biomechanical characteristics of the AC joint. Non cadaveric or projects involving reconstruction were excluded. Consistent parameters evaluated were anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior translation. The data were extracted from the included articles and summarized.
11 biomechanical papers were reviewed from six different countries - United States (n = 6), France (n = 1), Austria (n = 1), Thailand (n = 1), United Kingdom (n = 1), and Japan (n = 1). The total number of specimens included across the reviewed papers was 141. All 11 papers reported the data on an intact model (coracoclavicular and AC ligaments intact). Seven papers assessed the translational results of the AC sectioned condition, finding a greater increase in anterior-posterior (AP) laxity relative to SI. 3 papers evaluated coracoclavicular ligament sectioning, finding increased superior-inferior laxity relative to AP. Only one study involved ligament sectioning isolating the anterior-inferior bundle of the AC joint.
This review highlights the key AP and superior-inferior constraints of both the intact and ligament sectioned AC joint. The inconsistency of AC joint testing parameters and the lack of thorough translation studies indicate a necessity for increased attention in the overall assessment of shoulder stability to close the gap in the foundational biomechanical research.
本系统评价的目的是研究关于肩锁关节生物力学特性的现有文献,以确定平移参数的趋势以及支持该关节的各种韧带结构的作用。
在Web of Science、Scopus和PubMed数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,直至2023年10月,以识别报告肩锁关节生物力学特性的文章。排除非尸体研究或涉及重建的项目。评估的一致参数为前后、上下平移。从纳入的文章中提取数据并进行总结。
对来自六个不同国家的11篇生物力学论文进行了综述——美国(n = 6)、法国(n = 1)、奥地利(n = 1)、泰国(n = 1)、英国(n = 1)和日本(n = 1)。综述文章中纳入的标本总数为141个。所有11篇论文都报告了完整模型(喙锁韧带和肩锁韧带完整)的数据。七篇论文评估了肩锁关节切断状态下的平移结果,发现相对于矢状面,前后(AP)松弛度增加更大。三篇论文评估了喙锁韧带切断,发现相对于前后方向,上下松弛度增加。只有一项研究涉及分离肩锁关节前下束的韧带切断。
本综述强调了完整和韧带切断的肩锁关节在关键的前后和上下方向的限制。肩锁关节测试参数的不一致以及缺乏全面的平移研究表明,在肩部稳定性的整体评估中需要更多关注,以填补基础生物力学研究的空白。