Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Oct;132(10):107009. doi: 10.1289/EHP14418. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
Emerging literature suggests that fine particulate matter [with aerodynamic diameter ()] air pollution and its components are linked to various neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, few studies have evaluated how component mixtures from distinct sources relate to cognitive outcomes in children.
This cross-sectional study investigated how ambient concentrations of component mixtures relate to neurocognitive performance in 9- to 10-year-old children, as well as explored potential source-specific effects of these associations, across the US.
Using spatiotemporal hybrid models, annual concentrations of 15 chemical components of were estimated based on the residential address of child participants from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. General cognitive ability, executive function, and learning/memory scores were derived from the NIH Toolbox. We applied positive matrix factorization to identify six major sources based on the 15 components, which included crustal, ammonium sulfate, biomass burning, traffic, ammonium nitrate, and industrial/residual fuel burning. We then utilized weighted quantile sum (WQS) and linear regression models to investigate associations between components' mixture, their potential sources, and children's cognitive scores.
Mixture modeling revealed associations between cumulative exposure and worse cognitive performance across all three outcome domains, including shared overlap in detrimental effects driven by ammonium nitrates, silicon, and calcium. Using the identified six sources of exposure, source-specific negative associations were identified between ammonium nitrates and learning & memory, traffic and executive function, and crustal and industrial mixtures and general cognitive ability. Unexpected positive associations were also seen between traffic and general ability as well as biomass burning and executive function.
This work suggests nuanced associations between outdoor exposure and childhood cognitive performance, including important differences in cognition related both to individual chemicals as well as to specific sources of these exposures. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14418.
新兴文献表明,细颗粒物[空气动力学直径()]空气污染及其成分与各种神经发育结果有关。然而,很少有研究评估不同来源的成分混合物如何与儿童的认知结果相关。
本横断面研究调查了环境中成分混合物的浓度如何与 9 至 10 岁儿童的神经认知表现相关,并探讨了这些关联在美国特定来源的潜在特定来源效应。
使用时空混合模型,根据来自青少年大脑认知发展 (ABCD)研究的儿童参与者的居住地址,估计了 15 种成分的年度浓度。一般认知能力、执行功能和学习/记忆分数源自 NIH 工具包。我们应用正矩阵因子分解法根据 15 种成分识别六种主要的 来源,包括地壳、硫酸铵、生物质燃烧、交通、硝酸铵和工业/残余燃料燃烧。然后,我们利用加权分位数总和 (WQS) 和线性回归模型来研究成分混合物及其潜在来源与儿童认知分数之间的关联。
混合模型显示,在所有三个结果领域中,累积暴露与认知表现较差之间存在关联,包括硝酸铵、硅和钙驱动的有害影响存在共同重叠。使用确定的六种暴露源,发现了铵盐和学习记忆、交通和执行功能以及地壳和工业混合物与一般认知能力之间的特定来源的负相关。还观察到交通与一般能力以及生物质燃烧与执行功能之间意想不到的正相关。
这项工作表明,户外 暴露与儿童认知表现之间存在细微的关联,包括与个体化学物质以及这些暴露的特定来源相关的认知差异。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14418.