Foster D H
Biol Cybern. 1986;53(3):189-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00342886.
Measures of sensory performance yielding a nonlinear dependence on stimulus level are often used to derive a critical stimulus level that corresponds to some criterion level of performance. Typical examples include the sigmoidal psychometric function used to estimate a "threshold" stimulus level, and the power-law increment-threshold curve used to estimate a "field sensitivity". Estimates of the variance of an estimated critical stimulus level derived from a single set of performance data are, however, infrequently reported, even though other estimates of reliability may not be available. An application of the classical "combination of observations" method is described here by which such variance estimates may be computed. The method was tested by applying it to sets of simulated psychometric-function data and increment-threshold data and comparing its results with those obtained by Monte-Carlo studies, each comprising 1000 runs. Differences between the estimated root mean variance of the estimated critical stimulus level and the "true" value were found to be not more than about 3% of the true value.
对刺激水平呈现非线性依赖的感觉性能测量方法,常常被用于推导与某种性能标准水平相对应的临界刺激水平。典型的例子包括用于估计“阈值”刺激水平的S形心理测量函数,以及用于估计“场敏感性”的幂律增量阈值曲线。然而,即使可能没有其他可靠性估计值,从单一性能数据集得出的估计临界刺激水平的方差估计值也很少被报告。本文描述了经典“观测值组合”方法的一种应用,通过该方法可以计算此类方差估计值。通过将该方法应用于模拟心理测量函数数据集和增量阈值数据集,并将其结果与蒙特卡罗研究(每项研究包含1000次运行)所得结果进行比较,对该方法进行了测试。发现估计临界刺激水平的估计均方根方差与“真实”值之间的差异不超过真实值的约3%。