• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成绩和标准化考试中的性别成就差距——性别不平等的原因是什么?

The gender achievement gap in grades and standardised tests-what accounts for gender inequality?

作者信息

Lehti Hannu, Laaninen Markus

机构信息

Department of Social Research, Invest Flagship Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2024 Oct 16;9:1448488. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1448488. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1448488
PMID:39478953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11521978/
Abstract

We studied the gender achievement gap in grades and standardised test scores in Finland, where the gender differences are largest among OECD countries. We compared the gender achievement gap in standardised test scores from PISA surveys and grades from high-quality school registers in literacy. Furthermore, we analysed how grades differ from standardised test scores by family background and students' SES composition of the schools. By using the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method, we explored how different characteristics between girls and boys explain gender differences in grading. Our findings indicate that boys' grades were lower than can be expected based on standardised test scores. The gender gap in grades was explained by boys' lower reading interests, effort put into schoolwork, and conscientiousness on homework. However, even adjusting for schooling characteristics and competence, boys have lower grades than test scores in schools that have low SES student composition.

摘要

我们研究了芬兰成绩和标准化考试分数方面的性别成就差距,在经合组织国家中芬兰的性别差异最为显著。我们比较了国际学生评估项目(PISA)调查中标准化考试分数的性别成就差距以及高质量学校识字成绩记录中的分数差距。此外,我们分析了不同家庭背景和学生社会经济地位构成的学校中成绩与标准化考试分数的差异。通过使用布林德-奥萨克分解方法,我们探究了男孩和女孩之间的不同特征如何解释评分中的性别差异。我们的研究结果表明男孩的成绩低于基于标准化考试分数所预期的水平。成绩方面的性别差距可以通过男孩较低的阅读兴趣、在学业上付出的努力以及做作业时缺乏自觉性来解释。然而,即使对学校特征和能力进行调整后,在社会经济地位较低的学生构成的学校中,男孩的成绩仍低于考试分数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/6e1dba317c70/fsoc-09-1448488-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/67c499d92daf/fsoc-09-1448488-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/b0964046e242/fsoc-09-1448488-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/152b057fe50b/fsoc-09-1448488-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/785475e1fab8/fsoc-09-1448488-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/6e1dba317c70/fsoc-09-1448488-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/67c499d92daf/fsoc-09-1448488-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/b0964046e242/fsoc-09-1448488-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/152b057fe50b/fsoc-09-1448488-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/785475e1fab8/fsoc-09-1448488-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c6/11521978/6e1dba317c70/fsoc-09-1448488-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The gender achievement gap in grades and standardised tests-what accounts for gender inequality?成绩和标准化考试中的性别成就差距——性别不平等的原因是什么?
Front Sociol. 2024 Oct 16;9:1448488. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1448488. eCollection 2024.
2
Explaining academic-track boys' underachievement in language grades: Not a lack of aptitude but students' motivational beliefs and parents' perceptions?解析学术轨道上男生语言成绩不佳的原因:并非缺乏能力,而是学生的动机信念和家长的认知?
Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Jun;87(2):205-223. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12145. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Mindset × Context: Schools, Classrooms, and the Unequal Translation of Expectations into Math Achievement.心态×背景:学校、课堂和期望在数学成就上的不平等转化。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2023 Sep;88(2):7-109. doi: 10.1111/mono.12471.
4
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
5
Does chubby can get lower grades than skinny Sophie? Using an intersectional approach to uncover grading bias in German secondary schools.胖乎乎的查比会比骨瘦如柴的索菲成绩差吗?利用交叉视角揭示德国中学的评分偏见。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0305703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305703. eCollection 2024.
6
Human capital accumulation in post green revolution rural Pakistan: a progress report.巴基斯坦农村绿色革命后的人力资本积累:一份进展报告。
Pak Dev Rev. 1992 Winter;31(4 Pt 1):449-87.
7
Are some students graded more appropriately than others? Student characteristics as moderators of the relationships between teacher-assigned grades and test scores in mathematics.是否有些学生的评分比其他学生更合适?学生特征作为教师评分与数学考试成绩之间关系的调节变量。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Sep;91(3):865-881. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12397. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
8
Exploring the interplay between socioeconomic status and reading achievement: An expectancy-value perspective.探讨社会经济地位与阅读成就之间的相互作用:期望价值视角。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2022 Sep;92(3):1196-1214. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12495. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
9
Teachers' perceptions of students' mathematics proficiency may exacerbate early gender gaps in achievement.教师对学生数学能力的看法可能会加剧早期成就方面的性别差距。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Apr;50(4):1262-81. doi: 10.1037/a0035073. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
10
Gender gaps in cognitive and social-emotional skills in early primary grades: Evidence from rural Indonesia.早期小学阶段认知和社会情感技能的性别差距:来自印度尼西亚农村的证据。
Dev Sci. 2020 Sep;23(5):e12931. doi: 10.1111/desc.12931. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The nature-nurture of academic achievement at the intersection between gender, family background, and school context.学业成就的先天-后天性:性别、家庭背景和学校环境的交叉点
Soc Sci Res. 2023 Mar;111:102870. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102870. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
2
Parental background and daughters' and sons' educational outcomes - application of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis.父母背景与子女教育成果——特维尔斯-威拉德假说的应用。
J Biosoc Sci. 2023 Sep;55(5):853-872. doi: 10.1017/S0021932022000517. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
3
Cultural capital, teacher bias, and educational success: New evidence from monozygotic twins.
文化资本、教师偏见与教育成功:来自同卵双胞胎的新证据。
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Jul;65:130-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
4
Stereotype Threat.刻板印象威胁。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:415-37. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
5
Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis.性别差异在学业成就上的表现:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):1174-204. doi: 10.1037/a0036620. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
6
Teachers' perceptions of students' mathematics proficiency may exacerbate early gender gaps in achievement.教师对学生数学能力的看法可能会加剧早期成就方面的性别差距。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Apr;50(4):1262-81. doi: 10.1037/a0035073. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
7
Social and behavioral skills and the gender gap in early educational achievement.社会行为技能与早期教育成就的性别差距。
Soc Sci Res. 2012 Jan;41(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
8
The role of teachers' expectations in the association between children's SES and performance in kindergarten: a moderated mediation analysis.教师期望在儿童社会经济地位与幼儿园表现之间关系中的作用:一个有调节的中介分析。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034502. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
9
Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries.男孩和女孩是否认为自己在学校里的参与度一样高?来自 12 个国家的一项国际研究的结果。
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Feb;50(1):77-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
10
Effort on homework in grades 5-9: development, motivational antecedents, and the association with effort on classwork.五至九年级学生在家庭作业上的努力:发展情况、动机前因以及与课堂作业努力的关联。
Child Dev. 2006 Jul-Aug;77(4):1094-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00921.x.