• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估智力美德:智力美德性格量表(VICS)。

Assessing Intellectual Virtues: The Virtuous Intellectual Character Scale (VICS).

作者信息

Mesurado Belén, Vanney Claudia E

机构信息

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad Austral, Pilar, Argentina.

出版信息

Int J Appl Posit Psychol. 2024;9(3):1803-1826. doi: 10.1007/s41042-024-00193-y. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1007/s41042-024-00193-y
PMID:39479304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11519290/
Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to develop a scale that can facilitate a comprehensive assessment of intellectual virtues. To our knowledge, no instrument has been designed to assess virtuous intellectual character as a global construct, and this article aimed to fill this research gap through two studies. The first study aimed to investigate the construct validity and reliability of the scale, while the second study aimed to confirm the factorial structure observed in Study 1 and to analyze the convergent validity of the new scale. Study 1 included 545 college students (mean age = 19.57 years, SD = 1.41) enrolled in 33 undergraduate degree programs at Argentinean universities. Study 2 included 700 college students (mean age = 18.07, SD = 0.95). The EFA carried out in Study 1 identified five dimensions of the VICS (attentiveness, open-mindedness, curiosity, carefulness, and intellectual autonomy), and the CFA carried out in Study 2 validated the five-factor structure. A bifactor model indicated that each group of items was related to a specific virtue while simultaneously being linked to a bifactor or global construct, i.e., "a virtuous intellectual character." Our results confirm the existence of a global construct while preserving the specificity of each virtue. The results of Study 2 indicated that the VICS total score and its five factors are associated with intellectual humility, deep thinking, bravery, academic engagement, and social and psychological well-being. However, all intellectual virtues were only weakly associated with emotional well-being. Finally, both studies indicated good reliability of the VICS.

摘要

本文的主要目的是开发一种能够促进对智力美德进行全面评估的量表。据我们所知,尚未设计出用于评估作为一个整体概念的良性智力特征的工具,本文旨在通过两项研究填补这一研究空白。第一项研究旨在调查该量表的结构效度和信度,而第二项研究旨在确认在研究1中观察到的因子结构,并分析新量表的收敛效度。研究1包括545名就读于阿根廷大学33个本科学位课程的大学生(平均年龄 = 19.57岁,标准差 = 1.41)。研究2包括700名大学生(平均年龄 = 18.07,标准差 = 0.95)。在研究1中进行的探索性因子分析确定了智力美德量表(VICS)的五个维度(专注度、开放性思维、好奇心、谨慎性和智力自主性),在研究2中进行的验证性因子分析验证了五因素结构。一个双因素模型表明,每组项目都与一种特定的美德相关,同时又与一个双因素或整体概念,即“良性智力特征”相联系。我们的结果证实了整体概念的存在,同时保留了每种美德的特殊性。研究2的结果表明,智力美德量表总分及其五个因子与智力谦逊、深入思考、勇敢、学业参与以及社会和心理健康相关。然而,所有智力美德与情绪健康的关联都较弱。最后,两项研究均表明智力美德量表具有良好的信度。

相似文献

1
Assessing Intellectual Virtues: The Virtuous Intellectual Character Scale (VICS).评估智力美德:智力美德性格量表(VICS)。
Int J Appl Posit Psychol. 2024;9(3):1803-1826. doi: 10.1007/s41042-024-00193-y. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
Project on the Good Physician: Further Evidence for the Validity of a Moral Intuitionist Model of Virtuous Caring.良医项目:关于道德直觉主义美德关怀模型有效性的进一步证据
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jul-Sep;30(3):303-316. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1414608. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
3
Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis.跨学科研究的理智美德:共识定性分析。
Cogn Sci. 2023 Sep;47(9):e13348. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13348.
4
The Varieties of Character and Some Implications for Character Education.性格的多样性及其对品格教育的一些启示。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Jun;46(6):1153-1161. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0654-z. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
5
Assessing Character Strengths in Youth With Intellectual Disability: Reliability and Factorial Validity of the VIA-Youth.评估智障青少年的性格优势:青少年性格优势问卷(VIA-Youth)的信度和因子效度
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2018 Feb;56(1):13-29. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-56.1.13.
6
The epistemically virtuous clinician.具有认知美德的临床医生。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2009;30(3):249-65. doi: 10.1007/s11017-009-9109-1.
7
Was Sir William Crookes epistemically virtuous?威廉·克鲁克斯爵士在认知上是否具有美德?
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2014 Dec;48 Pt A:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
8
Relations between virtues and positive mental health in a Korean population: a Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model approach.韩国人群中美德与积极心理健康的关系:多指标多原因(MIMIC)模型方法。
Int J Psychol. 2015 Aug;50(4):272-8. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12096. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
9
Virtue in Medical Practice: An Exploratory Study.医疗实践中的美德:一项探索性研究。
HEC Forum. 2017 Mar;29(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10730-016-9308-x.
10
Character and virtue development in medical learners: another role for the arts?医学学习者的品格和美德发展:艺术的另一个作用?
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2023 Nov-Dec;35(7-8):631-635. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2023.2268211. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring qualities needed for interdisciplinary work: The Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research Scale (IVIRS).测量跨学科工作所需的素质:跨学科研究智力美德量表(IVIRS)。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 15;19(11):e0312938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312938. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Intellectual Curiosity across Cultures: Validity and Comparability of a New Scale in Six Languages.跨文化测量求知欲:一种新量表在六种语言中的信度和可比性。
J Pers Assess. 2024 Mar-Apr;106(2):156-173. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2023.2199863. Epub 2023 May 1.
2
Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review.好奇心心理学研究中的维度、测量与背景:一项范围综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;12(12):493. doi: 10.3390/bs12120493.
3
Clarifying the Content of Intellectual Humility: A Systematic Review and Integrative Framework.
厘清知识谦逊的内涵:系统性回顾与综合框架
J Pers Assess. 2022 Sep-Oct;104(5):573-585. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1975725. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
4
A tripartite taxonomy of character: Evidence for intrapersonal, interpersonal, and intellectual competencies in children.性格的三方分类法:儿童人际内、人际间和智力能力的证据
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2017 Jan;48:16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
5
Cognitive and Interpersonal Features of Intellectual Humility.认知与人际特征:智力谦逊
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Jun;43(6):793-813. doi: 10.1177/0146167217697695. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
6
Development and validation of a multi-dimensional measure of intellectual humility.一种多维智识谦逊测量方法的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0182950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182950. eCollection 2017.
7
The Varieties of Character and Some Implications for Character Education.性格的多样性及其对品格教育的一些启示。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Jun;46(6):1153-1161. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0654-z. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
Engagement, Flow, Self-Efficacy, and Eustress of University Students: A Cross-National Comparison Between the Philippines and Argentina.大学生的参与度、心流体验、自我效能感和良性压力:菲律宾与阿根廷的跨国比较
J Psychol. 2016;150(3):281-99. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2015.1024595. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
9
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals.坚毅:对长期目标的坚持不懈和热情。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1087-101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087.
10
Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health.精神疾病和/或心理健康?探究健康全状态模型的公理
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;73(3):539-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539.