Jenq C B, Coggeshall R E
Brain Res. 1986 Jan 29;364(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90986-8.
Autologous transplants are often used in repair of peripheral nerve injury. Quantitative evaluation of the results of such a transplant is obviously desirable. In previous study, we determined numerical and cytologic parameters of the regeneration that followed transection of rat sciatic nerve, but no transplant was used. This work now serves as a basis for evaluating the use of an autologous transplant in the same transection paradigm. Our procedure is to remove 8 mm of sciatic nerve in the thigh. The removed segment is then put into the center of a silicone tube and the proximal and distal stumps of the severed nerve are placed into the ends of the tube. The data show: (1) a high percentage of successful regenerations; (2) a relatively large nerve in the gap; (3) a typical outer perineurium underlying the epineurium; (4) a well-developed fascicular perineurium; and (5) approximately equal numbers of myelinated and unmyelinated axons in the gap and distal stump. If a transplant is not used there are: (1) a greater number of failures of regeneration; (2) a smaller nerve in the gap; (3) a less well-developed fascicular perineurium; (4) unequal numbers of axons in the gap as compared to the distal stump; and (5) no outer perineurium forms. The presence of a typical outer perineurium after a transplant and its absence if a transplant is not used is probably the most striking cytologic difference between the two paradigms. The equal numbers of axons in the gap and distal stump following regeneration after transplantation presumably indicate that all axons in the gap enter the distal stump without branching or ending blindly, a situation that is presumably beneficial and contrasts with the findings when a transplant is not used. Both paradigms show a remarkable increase in the density of blood vessels in the regenerated nerve in the gap between the two stumps. These findings will serve as a basis for further studies on the mechanisms of peripheral nerve regeneration.
自体移植常用于周围神经损伤的修复。显然,对这种移植结果进行定量评估是很有必要的。在先前的研究中,我们确定了大鼠坐骨神经横断后再生的数值和细胞学参数,但未使用移植。这项工作现在作为评估在相同横断模式下使用自体移植的基础。我们的操作过程是在大腿部切除8毫米的坐骨神经。然后将切除的神经段放入硅胶管的中心,并将切断神经的近端和远端残端放入管的两端。数据显示:(1)再生成功率高;(2)间隙中有相对较粗的神经;(3)神经外膜下有典型的外层束膜;(4)束状束膜发育良好;(5)间隙和远端残端中有髓鞘和无髓鞘轴突数量大致相等。如果不使用移植,则会出现:(1)再生失败的情况更多;(2)间隙中的神经较细;(3)束状束膜发育较差;(4)间隙中的轴突数量与远端残端相比不相等;(5)没有形成外层束膜。移植后有典型的外层束膜而不使用移植则没有,这可能是两种模式之间最显著的细胞学差异。移植后再生时间隙和远端残端中轴突数量相等,这大概表明间隙中的所有轴突都进入远端残端,没有分支或盲目终止,这种情况可能是有益的,与不使用移植时的结果形成对比。两种模式都显示,在两个残端之间的间隙中,再生神经中的血管密度显著增加。这些发现将作为进一步研究周围神经再生机制的基础。