• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Emerging technologies and research ethics: Developing editorial policy using a scoping review and reference panel.新兴技术与研究伦理:运用范围界定综述与顾问小组制定编辑政策。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 31;19(10):e0309715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309715. eCollection 2024.
2
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
3
Nursing Journal Policies on Disclosure and Management of Conflicts of Interest.护理期刊利益冲突披露和管理政策。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020 Nov;52(6):680-687. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12605. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.编辑与出版商出版伦理声明。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1351-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1351.
6
Do editorial policies support ethical research? A thematic text analysis of author instructions in psychiatry journals.编辑政策是否支持伦理研究?对精神病学杂志作者指南的主题文本分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 5;9(6):e97492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097492. eCollection 2014.
7
A survey of dental journal methodological practices: Reporting guidelines and ethical policies.口腔医学期刊方法学实践调查:报告指南和伦理政策。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Dec;149(12):1057-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
8
Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.医疗保健中的人工智能技术与人文关怀:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:971044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044. eCollection 2022.
9
Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3Rs.期刊社论政策、动物福利和 3R 原则。
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Dec;9(12):55-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160903318343.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining how Ethics in Relation to Health Technology is Described in the Research Literature: Scoping Review.研究文献中关于健康技术相关伦理的描述方式:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Aug 15;11(2):e38745. doi: 10.2196/38745.
2
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols.范围综述方案制定的最佳实践指南及报告项目
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):953-968. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00242.
3
Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017.对1987年至2017年期间分析作者指南的研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 5;12(1):5840. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26027-y.
4
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.综述的实施更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Implement. 2021 Mar;19(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000277.
5
Deidentification of facial photographs: a survey of editorial policies and practices.面部照片的去识别化:编辑政策与实践调查
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jan;48(1):56-60. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105823. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data.伦理生态系统:个人伦理、网络治理与规范社交媒体研究数据使用的行为主体
Minerva. 2019 Sep;57(3):317-343. doi: 10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
7
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
8
Responsible research publication: international standards for editors.负责任的研究发表:编辑的国际标准
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):35-41. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2015-0006.
9
Do editorial policies support ethical research? A thematic text analysis of author instructions in psychiatry journals.编辑政策是否支持伦理研究?对精神病学杂志作者指南的主题文本分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 5;9(6):e97492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097492. eCollection 2014.
10
The publication of ethically uncertain research: attitudes and practices of journal editors.有伦理争议的研究的发表:期刊编辑的态度和实践。
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Apr 11;13:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-4.

Emerging technologies and research ethics: Developing editorial policy using a scoping review and reference panel.

机构信息

Centre for Research on Education in a Digital Society and TD School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Digital Futures, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 31;19(10):e0309715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309715. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0309715
PMID:39480862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11527293/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emerging technologies and societal changes create new ethical concerns and greater need for cross-disciplinary and cross-stakeholder communication on navigating ethics in research. Scholarly articles are the primary mode of communication for researchers, however there are concerns regarding the expression of research ethics in these outputs. If not in these outputs, where should researchers and stakeholders learn about the ethical considerations of research?

OBJECTIVES

Drawing on a scoping review, analysis of policy in a specific disciplinary context (learning and technology), and reference group discussion, we address concerns regarding research ethics, in research involving emerging technologies through developing novel policy that aims to foster learning through the expression of ethical concepts in research.

APPROACH

This paper develops new editorial policy for expression of research ethics in scholarly outputs across disciplines. These guidelines, aimed at authors, reviewers, and editors, are underpinned by: a cross-disciplinary scoping review of existing policy and adherence to these policies;a review of emerging policies, and policies in a specific discipline (learning and technology); and,a collective drafting process undertaken by a reference group of journal editors (the authors of this paper).

RESULTS

Analysis arising from the scoping review indicates gaps in policy across a wide range of journals (54% have no statement regarding reporting of research ethics), and adherence (51% of papers reviewed did not refer to ethics considerations). Analysis of emerging and discipline-specific policies highlights gaps.

CONCLUSION

Our collective policy development process develops novel materials suitable for cross-disciplinary transfer, to address specific issues of research involving AI, and broader challenges of emerging technologies.

摘要