Suppr超能文献

Emerging technologies and research ethics: Developing editorial policy using a scoping review and reference panel.

机构信息

Centre for Research on Education in a Digital Society and TD School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Digital Futures, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 31;19(10):e0309715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309715. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emerging technologies and societal changes create new ethical concerns and greater need for cross-disciplinary and cross-stakeholder communication on navigating ethics in research. Scholarly articles are the primary mode of communication for researchers, however there are concerns regarding the expression of research ethics in these outputs. If not in these outputs, where should researchers and stakeholders learn about the ethical considerations of research?

OBJECTIVES

Drawing on a scoping review, analysis of policy in a specific disciplinary context (learning and technology), and reference group discussion, we address concerns regarding research ethics, in research involving emerging technologies through developing novel policy that aims to foster learning through the expression of ethical concepts in research.

APPROACH

This paper develops new editorial policy for expression of research ethics in scholarly outputs across disciplines. These guidelines, aimed at authors, reviewers, and editors, are underpinned by: a cross-disciplinary scoping review of existing policy and adherence to these policies;a review of emerging policies, and policies in a specific discipline (learning and technology); and,a collective drafting process undertaken by a reference group of journal editors (the authors of this paper).

RESULTS

Analysis arising from the scoping review indicates gaps in policy across a wide range of journals (54% have no statement regarding reporting of research ethics), and adherence (51% of papers reviewed did not refer to ethics considerations). Analysis of emerging and discipline-specific policies highlights gaps.

CONCLUSION

Our collective policy development process develops novel materials suitable for cross-disciplinary transfer, to address specific issues of research involving AI, and broader challenges of emerging technologies.

摘要

相似文献

5
Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.编辑与出版商出版伦理声明。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1351-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1351.

本文引用的文献

4
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.综述的实施更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Implement. 2021 Mar;19(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000277.
8
Responsible research publication: international standards for editors.负责任的研究发表:编辑的国际标准
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):35-41. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2015-0006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验