Research Animals Department, Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), Southwater, West Sussex, United Kingdom.
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Dec;9(12):55-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160903318343.
This study evaluates the editorial policies of a randomized sample of English language peer-reviewed journals that publish original research involving the use of animals. The aim is to identify whether journals have editorial policies relating to the use of animals in the research that they are prepared to publish and whether any policies are likely to promote animal welfare and dissemination of information on the 3Rs (reduction, refinement, replacement) within the scientific community. The results demonstrate that a significant proportion of journals publishing original research involving animals do not have any editorial policy relating to the use of animals. Of those journals that do have policies the majority simply request that the research be carried out in accordance with standard regulatory requirements. This paper aims to provide editors and publishers with the information they need to review their own editorial policies to ensure they are fulfilling their potential to promote animal welfare and dissemination of the 3Rs.
本研究评估了随机抽取的英文同行评审期刊的编辑政策,这些期刊发表涉及动物使用的原创研究。目的是确定期刊是否有与他们准备发表的研究中使用动物相关的编辑政策,以及任何政策是否有可能促进动物福利和 3Rs(减少、优化、替代)信息在科学界的传播。研究结果表明,大量发表涉及动物的原创研究的期刊没有任何与动物使用相关的编辑政策。在那些有政策的期刊中,大多数只是要求研究按照标准的监管要求进行。本文旨在为编辑和出版商提供他们所需的信息,以审查他们自己的编辑政策,以确保它们有潜力促进动物福利和 3Rs 的传播。