Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Psychooncology. 2024 Nov;33(11):e70012. doi: 10.1002/pon.70012.
Over half of new cancer diagnoses occur in patients aged 65 or older, with up to 40% experiencing anxiety. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) for anxiety screening, but the GAD-7 psychometric properties in this population are unknown. This study examined the GAD-7's reliability, validity, and item parameters, comparing its utility with the GAD-2 in older adults with cancer.
This cross-sectional secondary analysis of a nationwide multi-site two-arm cluster randomized trial in older adults (≥ 70) with advanced cancer. The GAD-7 was administered at baseline. Properties were evaluated with Cronbach's α, Pearson correlation coefficients, and a 2-parameter logistic model. Logistic regression models compared the GAD-2 and GAD-7.
The sample included 718 participants (Mean age = 77, SD = 5) with mild anxiety (M = 3.74, SD = 4.74). Internal consistency was strong (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) and item-total correlations ranged 0.53 to 0.78. Item 2 (Not being able to stop or control worrying) was the most discriminating and item 5 (Being so restless that it is hard to sit still) was least discriminating. Area Under the Curve (AUC) analyses demonstrated the GAD-2 had a 0.93-0.96 AUC.
Establishing the psychometric properties of anxiety screening measures is crucial in the older adults with cancer to maximize referral efficiency and accuracy. This study indicates that the GAD-7 is reliable and valid for older adults with cancer. Analyses suggest the GAD-2 may be as sufficient as the GAD-7 in identifying anxiety in older adults with cancer, thereby reducing assessment burden.
超过一半的新发癌症诊断发生在 65 岁及以上的患者中,多达 40%的患者会出现焦虑。美国临床肿瘤学会建议使用广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)进行焦虑筛查,但该量表在该人群中的心理测量特性尚不清楚。本研究旨在检查 GAD-7 在老年癌症患者中的可靠性、有效性和项目参数,并比较其与 GAD-2 在老年癌症患者中的应用。
这是一项对全国范围内多地点、两臂、聚类随机试验中年龄较大(≥70 岁)的晚期癌症患者进行的横断面二次分析。在基线时进行了 GAD-7 评估。采用 Cronbach's α、Pearson 相关系数和双参数逻辑模型评估属性。使用逻辑回归模型比较了 GAD-2 和 GAD-7。
该样本包括 718 名参与者(平均年龄 77 岁,标准差 5 岁),存在轻度焦虑(M=3.74,标准差 4.74)。内部一致性很强(Cronbach's alpha=0.89),项目与总分的相关系数范围为 0.53 至 0.78。项目 2(无法停止或控制担忧)的区分度最高,项目 5(烦躁不安,难以静坐)的区分度最低。曲线下面积(AUC)分析表明,GAD-2 的 AUC 为 0.93-0.96。
在老年癌症患者中,建立焦虑筛查工具的心理测量特性至关重要,以最大限度地提高转诊效率和准确性。本研究表明,GAD-7 对老年癌症患者是可靠和有效的。分析表明,GAD-2 与 GAD-7 一样能够识别老年癌症患者的焦虑,从而减轻评估负担。