• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生药物素养量表的编制及信度、效度检验。

Development and reliability and validity testing of a medication literacy scale for medical college students.

机构信息

School of Journalism and Communication, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1238. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06222-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06222-3
PMID:39482664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526536/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Irrational drug use has become a global problem threatening human health. As future health professionals, medical college students' medication literacy (ML) is critical. Their mastery of medication-related knowledge will directly affect public medication safety in the future.

METHODS

The initial scale was developed through a literature review and was modified through expert consultation and student interviews to form the initial scale with 14 items. In 2020, a questionnaire survey was conducted among students in a medical college for item analysis, reliability test, validity test and other analyses.

RESULTS

The total Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.826 and split-half reliability was 0.852. The Cronbach's α coefficients for functional medication literacy, communicative medication literacy, and critical medication literacy were 0.901, 0.858, and 0.851, respectively. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.833 to 1.000 (≥ 0.78). Factor analysis of 14 items showed that KMO = 0. 852(> 0.7) and Bartlett's spherical test p < 0.001, indicating that the data are very suitable for factor analysis. Three principal axis factors were extracted by principal component analysis, and the total variance interpretation rate was 69.031% (> 40%). The confirmatory factor analysis identified a three-factor model and showed goodness of fit indices for the scale: The χ²/df = 2.623, The Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.905, The Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.950, Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.922, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.938, and The Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.078.

CONCLUSION

A new scale for evaluating the medication literacy of Chinese medical college students was preliminarily developed, demonstrating good reliability and validity. Itcan be used as a preliminary measurement tool for assessing medical students' medication literacy. However, due to the limitations of this study, the practical application of the scale needs to be further examined in a larger sample and should be refined in future studies.

摘要

背景

不合理用药已成为威胁人类健康的全球性问题。作为未来的医疗专业人员,医学生的用药素养(ML)至关重要。他们对药物相关知识的掌握程度将直接影响未来公众的用药安全。

方法

初始量表通过文献回顾制定,并通过专家咨询和学生访谈进行修改,形成了包含 14 个项目的初始量表。2020 年,对一所医学院的学生进行了问卷调查,进行项目分析、信度测试、效度测试等分析。

结果

总量表 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.826,分半信度为 0.852。功能性用药素养、沟通性用药素养和批判性用药素养的 Cronbach's α 系数分别为 0.901、0.858 和 0.851。条目水平内容效度指数(I-CVI)范围为 0.833 至 1.000(≥0.78)。14 个条目的因子分析显示,KMO=0.852(>0.7),Bartlett 球形检验 p<0.001,表明数据非常适合因子分析。主成分分析提取 3 个主轴因子,总方差解释率为 69.031%(>40%)。验证性因子分析确定了一个三因素模型,表明该量表具有良好的拟合度指标:χ²/df=2.623,拟合优度指数(GFI)=0.905,比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.950,归一拟合指数(NFI)=0.922,Tucker-Lewis 指数(TLI)=0.938,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)=0.078。

结论

初步开发了一种用于评估中国医学生用药素养的新量表,具有良好的信度和效度。可作为评估医学生用药素养的初步测量工具。但由于本研究的局限性,该量表的实际应用需要在更大的样本中进一步检验,并在未来的研究中进行细化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91d2/11526536/e35a3a364f14/12909_2024_6222_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91d2/11526536/e35a3a364f14/12909_2024_6222_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91d2/11526536/e35a3a364f14/12909_2024_6222_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and reliability and validity testing of a medication literacy scale for medical college students.医学生药物素养量表的编制及信度、效度检验。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1238. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06222-3.
2
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
3
The transcultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Oral Health Literacy Scale for Diabetic Patients.《中文版糖尿病患者口腔健康素养量表的跨文化调适与验证》。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03965-9.
4
Structural Validation and Measurement Invariance Testing of the Chinese Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale Among Undergraduates: Cross-Sectional Study.大学生电子健康素养量表中文版的结构验证和测量不变性测试:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 13;25:e48838. doi: 10.2196/48838.
5
Measuring a Broad Spectrum of eHealth Skills in the Web 3.0 Context Using an eHealth Literacy Scale: Development and Validation Study.在 Web 3.0 背景下使用电子健康素养量表衡量广泛的电子健康技能:开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 23;23(9):e31627. doi: 10.2196/31627.
6
Adaptation of the Food Literacy Questionnaire for school children to Turkish: validity and reliability study.儿童食物素养问卷的土耳其语适应性改编:信度和效度研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jul;182(7):3307-3316. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05010-3. Epub 2023 May 11.
7
The falls health literacy scale: translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version.跌倒健康素养量表:中文版的翻译、文化调适与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):2329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19784-0.
8
Revision of brief health literacy assessment scale among the older adults and its reliability and validity test.老年人简易健康素养评估量表的修订及其信效度检验
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jan 28;48(1):123-129. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220011.
9
[Evaluation of reliability and validity of Chinese version of a short-form of Health Literacy Dental scale (HeLD-14) in the application among parents of preschool children].中文版简化健康素养牙科量表(HeLD-14)在学龄前儿童家长中应用的信效度评价
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Oct 18;56(5):828-832. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.05.012.
10
Brief adult respiratory system health status scale-community version (BARSHSS-CV): developing and evaluating the reliability and validity.简易成人呼吸系统健康状况量表-社区版(BARSHSS-CV):信效度的开发与评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3505-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Medication Literacy and Its Determinants in Chinese Patients with Multimorbidity.评估中国多病共存患者的用药知识及其决定因素。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Sep 6;19:2747-2757. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S539753. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Skeletal Editing: A Novel Method for "Psychiatric Drug Flipping" to Produce New, Precise Ones with Fewer Side Effects.骨骼编辑:一种“精神药物翻转”的新方法,用于生产副作用更少的新型精准药物。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 1;25(1):111-112. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231488. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
An Umbrella Review and a Meta-analysis of Meta-analyses of Disordered Eating Among Medical Students.医学生饮食失调的伞状综述及荟萃分析的荟萃分析
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 1;25(2):165-174. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241515. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Prevalence and risk factors for misuse of prescription psychotropic drug in patients with severe mental illness: A systematic review.
严重精神障碍患者处方精神药物滥用的流行状况和危险因素:系统评价。
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2023 Sep;51(5):229-240. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of medical students202.**译文**:COVID-19 大流行对医学生心理健康的影响 202。
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2023 Sep;51(5):202-215. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
5
Development and Validation of Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Perceived Stigmatization in Physicians Scale.《2019冠状病毒病所致医生感知污名化量表的编制与验证》
Alpha Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 1;24(4):138-145. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221038. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Assessment of an instrument scale measuring the knowledge of antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV.评估一种用于测量 HIV 感染者对抗逆转录病毒疗法知识的工具量表。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;23(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15220-x.
7
Sample size in quantitative instrument validation studies: A systematic review of articles published in Scopus, 2021.定量仪器验证研究中的样本量:对2021年发表在Scopus上的文章的系统评价
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 12;8(12):e12223. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12223. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Medical Faculty Students' Views on Euthanasia: Does It Change With Medical Education?医学院学生对安乐死的看法:它会随着医学教育而改变吗?
Alpha Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 18;22(2):113-117. doi: 10.5455/apd.126615. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Psychometric properties and validation of the revised Chinese Medication Literacy Scale for Hypertensive Patients (C-MLSHP-R).高血压患者中文药物素养量表修订版(C-MLSHP-R)的心理测量学特性及效度验证
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 6;9:976691. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.976691. eCollection 2022.
10
Status of medication literacy and its related factors among undergraduate students in Shanxi Province, China: A cross-sectional study.中国山西省大学生药物素养及其相关因素的现状:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Aug;47(8):1201-1211. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13655. Epub 2022 Mar 28.