Villa Evangeline K, Abad Aaron Adolf R
Department of Anesthesiology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila.
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Oct 15;58(18):64-70. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.7459. eCollection 2024.
Brachytherapy is the only demonstrated technique of delivering the high radiation dose required to control cervical cancer (>80 Gray [Gy]) without causing unwanted side effects. There is still limited data available in the Philippines regarding the anesthetic management of patients receiving intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. It is the aim of this study to present the anesthetic management of these procedures performed in a non-operating site remote from the main hospital during the first 1 ½ years of the COVID-19 pandemic.
A retrospective review of 446 eligible charts was made. Data collected included demographic variables, ASA physical status classification, anesthetic technique, anesthetic agents used, oxygen supplementation device, duration of procedure, intra-procedure complication, intra-procedure pain medications, post-procedure pain medications, recovery room (RR) rescue medications, time to fulfill discharge criteria, and patient disposition.
Four hundred forty-six (446) anesthetic encounters involving 117 patients is presented. Charts from 46 patients were excluded as it cannot be located. Mean age of the patients was 49 years with majority having normal BMI. Spinal anesthesia (SA) was more frequently (75%) used compared to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Less than 5% immediate anesthesia-related complications were recorded and all patients were discharged on the same day.
Spinal anesthesia and TIVA are safe and effective anesthetic techniques in patients with cervical cancer undergoing high dose intracavitary brachytherapy. Prospective studies to assess other aspects of their care as well as anesthesia-related long-term effects from repetitive anesthetic exposure is recommended.
近距离放射治疗是唯一经证实的能够在不引起不良副作用的情况下,提供控制宫颈癌所需高辐射剂量(>80 格雷 [Gy])的技术。在菲律宾,关于接受宫颈癌腔内近距离放射治疗患者的麻醉管理,可用数据仍然有限。本研究的目的是介绍在新冠疫情的前 1 年半期间,在远离主医院的非手术地点进行的这些手术的麻醉管理情况。
对 446 份符合条件的病历进行回顾性研究。收集的数据包括人口统计学变量、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级、麻醉技术、使用的麻醉药物、氧气补充装置、手术持续时间、术中并发症、术中止痛药物、术后止痛药物、恢复室(RR)急救药物、达到出院标准的时间以及患者处置情况。
呈现了涉及 117 名患者的 446 次麻醉记录。46 名患者的病历因无法找到而被排除。患者的平均年龄为 49 岁,大多数患者体重指数正常。与全静脉麻醉(TIVA)相比,脊髓麻醉(SA)的使用频率更高(75%)。记录的即时麻醉相关并发症少于 5%,所有患者均在当天出院。
脊髓麻醉和全静脉麻醉在接受高剂量腔内近距离放射治疗的宫颈癌患者中是安全有效的麻醉技术。建议进行前瞻性研究,以评估其护理的其他方面以及重复麻醉暴露产生的麻醉相关长期影响。