Cho Sooni, Cho Yong Hyuk, Noh Jai Sung, Jeong Seong Kwon, Kim Shin Kwon, Kim Seongsu
Eum Hospital, Yong In, Republic of Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 17;15:1426122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1426122. eCollection 2024.
This study explores the subjective experiences of participants in a 5-day Open Dialogue (OD) workshop and a 1-year pilot practice, conducted as part of the WHO QualityRights Project in South Korea. Twenty-four participants, selected through purposive sampling, completed surveys immediately after the workshop and 1 year later. Data were analyzed through both statistical and thematic approaches. A statistically significant decrease in the availability of "Flexibility and Mobility" was observed across all participants ( = 0.044) and a significant reduction in the availability of "Tolerance of Uncertainty" ( = 0.04) was noted among participants who engaged in network meetings over the course of 1 year. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants initially felt ambivalent toward OD due to systemic, cultural, and professional challenges. However, through experiential learning, their ambivalence shifted to hope, fostering solidarity and a more positive outlook for future OD practice. Participants recognized that implementing OD supported human rights, while addressing personal, organizational, and policy challenges. The findings provide important insights for developing OD training and implementation guidelines in South Korea. Recommendations include focusing on experiential learning and selecting mixed-group trainees from catchment area institutions, emphasizing the support of client rights, and considering individual, organizational, and systemic levels for successful implementation. This study represents a new case of OD dissemination through a top-down national research and development project and its integration into the WHO QualityRights service package, suggesting complementary potential between OD and global human rights-based mental health initiatives.
本研究探讨了作为世界卫生组织韩国质量权利项目一部分开展的为期5天的开放对话(OD)工作坊及为期1年的试点实践中参与者的主观体验。通过目的抽样选取的24名参与者在工作坊结束后及1年后立即完成了调查。数据通过统计和主题分析方法进行分析。在所有参与者中观察到“灵活性和机动性”的可获得性有统计学显著下降(P = 0.044),并且在参与了为期1年网络会议的参与者中,“对不确定性的容忍度”的可获得性有显著降低(P = 0.04)。定性分析表明,由于系统、文化和专业方面的挑战,参与者最初对开放对话持矛盾态度。然而,通过体验式学习,他们的矛盾态度转变为希望,促进了团结以及对未来开放对话实践更积极的展望。参与者认识到实施开放对话支持了人权,同时解决了个人、组织和政策方面的挑战。这些发现为韩国制定开放对话培训和实施指南提供了重要见解。建议包括注重体验式学习,从集水区机构挑选混合组学员,强调对服务对象权利的支持,并考虑个人、组织和系统层面以实现成功实施。本研究代表了通过自上而下的国家研发项目传播开放对话并将其纳入世界卫生组织质量权利服务包的一个新案例,表明开放对话与基于全球人权的精神卫生倡议之间具有互补潜力。