• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在韩国引入作为世界卫生组织质量权利项目一部分的开放式对话:来自入门研讨会和为期一年的试点实践的经验与看法

Introducing Open Dialogue as part of the WHO QualityRights Project in South Korea: experiences and opinions from an introductory workshop and 1-year pilot practice.

作者信息

Cho Sooni, Cho Yong Hyuk, Noh Jai Sung, Jeong Seong Kwon, Kim Shin Kwon, Kim Seongsu

机构信息

Eum Hospital, Yong In, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 17;15:1426122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1426122. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1426122
PMID:39483400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11525595/
Abstract

This study explores the subjective experiences of participants in a 5-day Open Dialogue (OD) workshop and a 1-year pilot practice, conducted as part of the WHO QualityRights Project in South Korea. Twenty-four participants, selected through purposive sampling, completed surveys immediately after the workshop and 1 year later. Data were analyzed through both statistical and thematic approaches. A statistically significant decrease in the availability of "Flexibility and Mobility" was observed across all participants ( = 0.044) and a significant reduction in the availability of "Tolerance of Uncertainty" ( = 0.04) was noted among participants who engaged in network meetings over the course of 1 year. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants initially felt ambivalent toward OD due to systemic, cultural, and professional challenges. However, through experiential learning, their ambivalence shifted to hope, fostering solidarity and a more positive outlook for future OD practice. Participants recognized that implementing OD supported human rights, while addressing personal, organizational, and policy challenges. The findings provide important insights for developing OD training and implementation guidelines in South Korea. Recommendations include focusing on experiential learning and selecting mixed-group trainees from catchment area institutions, emphasizing the support of client rights, and considering individual, organizational, and systemic levels for successful implementation. This study represents a new case of OD dissemination through a top-down national research and development project and its integration into the WHO QualityRights service package, suggesting complementary potential between OD and global human rights-based mental health initiatives.

摘要

本研究探讨了作为世界卫生组织韩国质量权利项目一部分开展的为期5天的开放对话(OD)工作坊及为期1年的试点实践中参与者的主观体验。通过目的抽样选取的24名参与者在工作坊结束后及1年后立即完成了调查。数据通过统计和主题分析方法进行分析。在所有参与者中观察到“灵活性和机动性”的可获得性有统计学显著下降(P = 0.044),并且在参与了为期1年网络会议的参与者中,“对不确定性的容忍度”的可获得性有显著降低(P = 0.04)。定性分析表明,由于系统、文化和专业方面的挑战,参与者最初对开放对话持矛盾态度。然而,通过体验式学习,他们的矛盾态度转变为希望,促进了团结以及对未来开放对话实践更积极的展望。参与者认识到实施开放对话支持了人权,同时解决了个人、组织和政策方面的挑战。这些发现为韩国制定开放对话培训和实施指南提供了重要见解。建议包括注重体验式学习,从集水区机构挑选混合组学员,强调对服务对象权利的支持,并考虑个人、组织和系统层面以实现成功实施。本研究代表了通过自上而下的国家研发项目传播开放对话并将其纳入世界卫生组织质量权利服务包的一个新案例,表明开放对话与基于全球人权的精神卫生倡议之间具有互补潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6733/11525595/2d7a5127ee95/fpsyg-15-1426122-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6733/11525595/2d7a5127ee95/fpsyg-15-1426122-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6733/11525595/2d7a5127ee95/fpsyg-15-1426122-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Introducing Open Dialogue as part of the WHO QualityRights Project in South Korea: experiences and opinions from an introductory workshop and 1-year pilot practice.在韩国引入作为世界卫生组织质量权利项目一部分的开放式对话:来自入门研讨会和为期一年的试点实践的经验与看法
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 17;15:1426122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1426122. eCollection 2024.
2
Unraveling complexity in changing mental health care towards person-centered care.在向以患者为中心的护理转变的过程中揭示心理健康护理的复杂性。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 14;14:1250856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1250856. eCollection 2023.
3
Introducing Peer-supported Open Dialogue in changing mental health care.在不断变化的精神卫生保健中引入同伴支持的开放式对话。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;13:1056071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1056071. eCollection 2022.
4
Open Dialogue services around the world: a scoping survey exploring organizational characteristics in the implementation of the Open Dialogue approach in mental health services.世界各地的开放式对话服务:一项范围界定调查,探索精神卫生服务中实施开放式对话方法的组织特征。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 10;14:1241936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241936. eCollection 2023.
5
The introduction and implementation of open dialogue in a day center in Athens, Greece: experiences and reflections of mental health professionals.希腊雅典一家日间护理中心开放式对话的引入与实施:心理健康专业人员的经验与思考
Front Psychol. 2023 May 25;14:1074203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1074203. eCollection 2023.
6
Becoming an Open Dialogue practitioner: a qualitative study of practitioners' training experiences and transitioning to practice.成为一名开放对话实践者:对实践者培训经历及向实践过渡的定性研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1432327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1432327. eCollection 2024.
7
The WHO QualityRights Initiative and its use worldwide: A literature review.世界卫生组织质量权利倡议及其在全球的应用:文献综述
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2024 May;70(3):424-436. doi: 10.1177/00207640231207580. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
8
Implementation of the World Health Organization's QualityRights initiative in Ghana: an overview.世界卫生组织“质量权利”倡议在加纳的实施情况概述。
BJPsych Open. 2024 May 13;10(3):e111. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.11.
9
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
10
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Open Dialogue in Italian mental health services: evidence from a multisite prospective cohort study.评估意大利心理健康服务中的开放式对话:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 6;15:1428689. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1428689. eCollection 2024.
2
Becoming an Open Dialogue practitioner: a qualitative study of practitioners' training experiences and transitioning to practice.成为一名开放对话实践者:对实践者培训经历及向实践过渡的定性研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1432327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1432327. eCollection 2024.
3
Open Dialogue services around the world: a scoping survey exploring organizational characteristics in the implementation of the Open Dialogue approach in mental health services.
世界各地的开放式对话服务:一项范围界定调查,探索精神卫生服务中实施开放式对话方法的组织特征。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 10;14:1241936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241936. eCollection 2023.
4
Training in Open Dialogue and Dialogical Practice: creatively responding as trainers and writers.开放式对话与对话实践培训:作为培训师和写作者进行创造性回应。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 4;14:1174680. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174680. eCollection 2023.
5
The introduction and implementation of open dialogue in a day center in Athens, Greece: experiences and reflections of mental health professionals.希腊雅典一家日间护理中心开放式对话的引入与实施:心理健康专业人员的经验与思考
Front Psychol. 2023 May 25;14:1074203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1074203. eCollection 2023.
6
Implementation of open dialogue in Germany: Efforts, challenges, and obstacles.德国开放式对话的实施:努力、挑战与障碍。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;13:1072719. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1072719. eCollection 2022.
7
Co-therapy in Open Dialogue: Transforming therapists' self in a shared space.开放对话中的联合治疗:在共享空间中转变治疗师的自我。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 25;14:1083502. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1083502. eCollection 2023.
8
Introducing Peer-supported Open Dialogue in changing mental health care.在不断变化的精神卫生保健中引入同伴支持的开放式对话。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;13:1056071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1056071. eCollection 2022.
9
"Bringing new life in": Hope as a know-how of not knowing.“带来新生命”:希望作为一种未知的诀窍。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 14;13:948317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948317. eCollection 2022.
10
Open dialogue trainees' perspectives on learning processes and psychotherapeutic practice: A prospective focus group study.开放对话培训生对学习过程和心理治疗实践的看法:一项前瞻性焦点小组研究。
Fam Process. 2023 Sep;62(3):993-1005. doi: 10.1111/famp.12832. Epub 2022 Oct 27.