• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和管理人员如何看待初级卫生保健中的金标准要素?

How do Patients and Managers Value Gold Standard Elements in Primary Health Care.

作者信息

Gálvez G, Jimenez M L, Manzanera R, Ávalos A, De Castro M, Moral I, Iruela A

机构信息

Patient Evaluation and Experience Unit. Catalan Health Service, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Emergency Medicine University of the Philippines, College of Medicine, Manila, Philippines.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2024 Oct 3;11:23743735241282702. doi: 10.1177/23743735241282702. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1177/23743735241282702
PMID:39484229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526219/
Abstract

The study explores how Primary Health Care Team managers in Catalonia assess the gold standard criteria for excellence in Primary Health Care and whether there are differences in evaluations between the best and worst-rated centers by patients in a patient experience survey included in the Catalan Satisfaction Survey Plan (PLAENSA). The researchers used mixed methods to analyze 12 interviews done to Primary Care Team (PCT) managers. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed, yielding three themes and 12 subthemes. A Likert-type questionnaire was also used to compare results. Scores were observed between 4.8 and 3.5 regarding a constant relationship with the patient (longitudinality), and patient's experience, respectively. All managers highlight accessibility, nursing management, and administrative support as essential to patient experience. No significant differences exist in PCT's scores or gold standard element application. Disposing of good accessibility, crucial in Primary Health Care management, an administrative team, and efficiently prepared and motivated professionals, are key elements to a patient's experience in Primary Health Care. Contrary to other studies, interviewees described better accessibility in rural centers, which is likely why they are better valued by patients.

摘要

该研究探讨了加泰罗尼亚的初级卫生保健团队管理者如何评估初级卫生保健卓越的金标准标准,以及在加泰罗尼亚满意度调查计划(PLAENSA)中包含的患者体验调查中,患者评价最佳和最差的中心之间在评估上是否存在差异。研究人员采用混合方法分析了对初级保健团队(PCT)管理者进行的12次访谈。访谈内容被转录和分析,得出了三个主题和12个子主题。还使用了李克特式问卷来比较结果。在与患者的持续关系(纵向性)和患者体验方面,得分分别在4.8至3.5之间。所有管理者都强调可及性、护理管理和行政支持对患者体验至关重要。PCT的得分或金标准要素的应用不存在显著差异。具备良好的可及性,这在初级卫生保健管理中至关重要,一个行政团队,以及高效准备且积极性高的专业人员,是患者在初级卫生保健中体验的关键要素。与其他研究相反,受访者描述农村中心的可及性更好,这可能就是它们在患者中更受重视的原因。

相似文献

1
How do Patients and Managers Value Gold Standard Elements in Primary Health Care.患者和管理人员如何看待初级卫生保健中的金标准要素?
J Patient Exp. 2024 Oct 3;11:23743735241282702. doi: 10.1177/23743735241282702. eCollection 2024.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
[Evaluation of Primary Care Accessibility and Longitudinality in Granada Using Primary Care Assessment Tools].[使用初级保健评估工具对格拉纳达初级保健可及性和连续性的评估]
J Healthc Qual Res. 2018 May-Jun;33(3):121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 May 26.
4
5
Perceptions of health managers and professionals about mental health and primary care integration in Rio de Janeiro: a mixed methods study.里约热内卢健康管理人员与专业人员对心理健康与初级保健整合的认知:一项混合方法研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 30;16(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1740-8.
6
Which Factors Are Associated With Satisfaction With Treatment Results in Patients With Hand and Wrist Conditions? A Large Cohort Analysis.哪些因素与手部和腕部疾病患者对治疗结果的满意度相关?一项大型队列分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1287-1301. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002107. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
7
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
8
9
Analysis of team types based on collaborative relationships among doctors, home-visiting nurses and care managers for effective support of patients in end-of-life home care.基于医生、家访护士和护理经理之间协作关系的团队类型分析,以有效支持临终患者的家庭护理。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Nov;17(11):1943-1950. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12998. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging Magnet® principles: Leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic.利用 Magnet®原则:COVID-19 大流行期间的领导力。
Nurs Manage. 2021 Dec 1;52(12):22-27. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000792016.93450.50.
2
Why does continuity of care with family doctors matter? Review and qualitative synthesis of patient and physician perspectives.家庭医生连续性照护为何重要?患者和医生观点的回顾与定性综合。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Sep;67(9):679-688. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6709679.
3
An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Barriers and Facilitators.基层医疗中跨专业协作的综述概述:障碍与促进因素
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Jun 22;21(2):32. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5589.
4
Using patient feedback to drive quality improvement in hospitals: a qualitative study.利用患者反馈推动医院质量改进:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 23;10(10):e037641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037641.
5
Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour.初级保健研究中的半结构化访谈:关系与严谨性的平衡。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 8;7(2):e000057. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000057. eCollection 2019.
6
Doctors' engagements with patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care: a qualitative study.医生在初级和二级医疗保健中参与患者体验调查:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):385-394. doi: 10.1111/hex.12465. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.从三重目标到四重目标:照顾患者需要照顾医疗服务提供者。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713.
8
Quality, satisfaction, and financial efficiency associated with elements of primary care practice transformation: preliminary findings.初级保健实践转型要素与质量、满意度和财务效率的关系:初步发现。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S50-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1475.
9
Challenges to the credibility of patient feedback in primary healthcare settings: a qualitative study.基层医疗环境中患者反馈可信度面临的挑战:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Mar;63(608):e200-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X664252.
10
A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness.患者体验与临床安全性和有效性之间关联的证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 3;3(1):e001570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570.