Thomas Dean N, Wills John W, Burman Mark, Williams Abbie N, Harte Danielle S G, Buckley Ruby A, Urquhart Mike W, Bretonnet Anne-Sophie, Jeffries Benjamin, White Angela T, Harvey James S, Howe Jonathan R, Lynch Anthony M
GSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
School of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
Mutagenesis. 2025 Apr 24;40(2):116-125. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geae027.
The in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test is crucial for evaluating the mutagenicity of pharmaceutical impurities. For N-nitrosamines (NAs) historical data indicated that for certain members of this chemical class, the outcomes of the Ames test did not correlate with their associated rodent carcinogenicity outcomes. This has resulted in negative outcomes in an OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development)-aligned Ames test alone (standard or enhanced) no longer being considered sufficient by regulatory authorities to assess potential carcinogenic risk of NAs if present as impurities in drug products. Consequently, extensive follow-up in vivo testing can be required to characterize the potential mutagenicity and genotoxic carcinogenicity of NA impurities (i.e. beyond that defined in the ICH M7 guideline for non-NA impurities). We previously demonstrated that the mutagenicity of alkyl-nitrosamines can be detected by the appropriately designed, OECD-aligned Ames test and identified those conditions that contributed most to assay sensitivity. This OECD-aligned Ames test design was used to assess seven NAs, i.e. (methyl(neopentyl)nitrosamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-2-propanamine, N-nitrosodiisopropylamine, bis(2-methoxyethyl)nitrosoamine, N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-fluoroaniline, dinitrosoethambutol, (R,R)- and mononitrosocaffeidine) that were reported to be negative in historical Ames tests but positive in rodent carcinogenicity studies. All seven of the NAs were demonstrated to be mutagenic in the OECD-aligned Ames test and therefore these compounds should no longer be considered as discordant (false negatives) with respect to the correlation of the Ames test and rodent carcinogenicity. These results confirm the sensitivity of the OECD-aligned Ames test for the detection of NA mutagenicity and provides further support of its pivotal placement within the ICH M7 framework for the assessment of mutagenic impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk. In addition, we present data for 1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine, that indicates it could serve as a suitable positive control to provide further confidence in the sensitivity of the Ames test for the NA chemical class.
体外细菌回复突变(Ames)试验对于评估药物杂质的致突变性至关重要。对于N-亚硝胺(NAs),历史数据表明,对于该化学类别的某些成员,Ames试验的结果与其相关的啮齿动物致癌性结果不相关。这导致仅在经经济合作与发展组织(OECD)认可的Ames试验(标准或增强型)中得出阴性结果,监管当局不再认为这足以评估作为药品杂质存在的NAs的潜在致癌风险。因此,可能需要进行广泛的后续体内试验,以表征NA杂质的潜在致突变性和遗传毒性致癌性(即超出ICH M7指南中对非NA杂质定义的范围)。我们之前证明,通过适当设计的、经OECD认可的Ames试验可以检测烷基亚硝胺的致突变性,并确定了对试验灵敏度贡献最大的那些条件。这种经OECD认可的Ames试验设计用于评估七种NAs,即(甲基(新戊基)亚硝胺、N-甲基-N-亚硝基-2-丙胺、N-亚硝基二异丙胺、双(2-甲氧基乙基)亚硝胺、N-亚硝基-N-甲基-4-氟苯胺、二亚硝基乙胺丁醇、(R,R)-和单亚硝基咖啡因),这些在历史Ames试验中报告为阴性,但在啮齿动物致癌性研究中为阳性。所有七种NAs在经OECD认可的Ames试验中均被证明具有致突变性,因此就Ames试验与啮齿动物致癌性的相关性而言,这些化合物不应再被视为不一致(假阴性)。这些结果证实了经OECD认可的Ames试验对检测NA致突变性的灵敏度,并为其在ICH M7框架内用于评估药品中致突变杂质以限制潜在致癌风险的关键地位提供了进一步支持。此外,我们提供了1-环戊基-4-亚硝基哌嗪的数据,表明它可作为合适的阳性对照,以进一步增强对Ames试验对NA化学类别灵敏度的信心。