Is biomechanical loading reduced in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation during fast-paced walking when using different ankle/foot prostheses? A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION

Sound side loading is a risk factor for osteoarthritis development, which has been noted to reduce when using advanced prostheses during normal-paced walking in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation (UTTA). However, descriptions of loading during fast-paced walking remain relatively unreported. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the biomechanical loading of individuals with UTTA while using different ankle/foot prostheses during fast-paced walking.

METHODS

A blinded, randomized control trial was conducted in a group of K3-K4 ambulators, who used 3 different prosthetic feet (1. a solid ankle cushioned heel foot prosthesis [SACH], 2. a standard energy storage and return foot prosthesis [ESAR], and 3. a novel ESAR foot prosthesis [N-ESAR]) in a 2-week randomized crossover design. The spatiotemporal and kinetic data of the participants' fast walking pace were collected. Data were analyzed using a mixed model and one-way analysis of variances ( p < 0.05) and Cohen d .

RESULTS

Twenty individuals with UTTA (age: 40 ± 16 years; height: 1.76 ± 0.09 m; and BMI: 24.72 ± 3.63 kg/m 2 ) participated in this study. There were minimal changes in the spatiotemporal data between the different prosthetic feet. When the participants used the N-ESAR feet, they had a lower peak vertical ground reaction force ( p = 0.02) and external knee adduction moment ( p = 0.02) on the sound side, as well as a higher distal shank power on the prosthetic side ( p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Overall fast-paced walking resulted in higher sound side loading forces compared with normal-paced walking. However, use of the N-ESAR prosthesis reduced the biomechanical loading on the sound side in individuals with UTTA while walking at a fast pace compared with the ESAR and SACH prostheses. The percentage change in the biomechanical loading from normal- to fast-paced walking of the N-ESAR foot was also larger compared with the other prostheses, perhaps because of the individuals' ability to achieve a faster walking pace when using the N-ESAR prosthesis. Longitudinal intervention studies should be performed to further investigate the possible benefits of using advanced prostheses.