Suppr超能文献

博士学位-护理学博士合作:护理领域学术伙伴关系的综合综述

PhD-DNP Collaboration: An Integrative Review of Scholarly Partnerships in Nursing.

作者信息

Garcia Theresa J, Bai Jinbing, Shen Natalie, Smith Lenora, Koszalinski Rebecca S

机构信息

St. David's School of Nursing, Texas State University, Round Rock, Texas, USA.

Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 2025 Feb;48(1):41-62. doi: 10.1002/nur.22423. Epub 2024 Nov 2.

Abstract

Nurses holding terminal degrees, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Doctor of Nursing Science (DNS), and Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), fulfill different roles in nursing. The continued growth of nursing science and practice is dependent on alliances between these nurses that produce state-of-the-art knowledge and support the translation of evidence to practice. This integrative review described characteristics of scholarly collaborations between nurses holding a research-focused degree, the PhD, and those holding a practice-focused degree, the DNP. Five major nursing, medicine, and education databases were searched for peer-reviewed, original articles addressing or describing the characteristics of PhD-DNP scholarly collaborations, published through March 2023. In total, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria, and an integrative synthesis was conducted using constant comparison and thematic analysis. Findings included one overarching theme, Role Clarification, as well as four subthemes that emerged across the sample, describing key characteristics of collaborative PhD-DNP scholarship: (1) Mutual understanding and appreciation of strengths; (2) Strategic project planning and team building; (3) Clear organizational/administrative directives and guidance; and (4) Shared goals for the nursing profession. Articles describing the collaboration between nurses holding doctoral degrees are limited and provide primarily lower-level research evidence and evidence-based practice outcomes. Despite efforts to foster scholarly collaborations among nurses holding terminal degrees, more research is needed to clarify individual roles, offer tangible strategies for collaboration, and measure outcomes of collaboration benefitting healthcare systems, patient outcomes, and the nursing profession. This integrative review involved only the review of the extant literature.

摘要

拥有终端学位的护士,如哲学博士(PhD)、护理科学博士(DNS)和护理实践博士(DNP),在护理领域发挥着不同的作用。护理科学和实践的持续发展依赖于这些护士之间的联盟,这些联盟能够产生最前沿的知识,并支持将证据转化为实践。本整合性综述描述了拥有以研究为重点学位(PhD)的护士与拥有以实践为重点学位(DNP)的护士之间学术合作的特点。在五个主要的护理、医学和教育数据库中搜索了截至2023年3月发表的、经过同行评审的、涉及或描述PhD-DNP学术合作特点的原创文章。总共15篇文章符合纳入标准,并使用持续比较和主题分析进行了整合性综合分析。研究结果包括一个总体主题“角色澄清”,以及在样本中出现的四个子主题,描述了合作性PhD-DNP学术研究的关键特征:(1)相互理解和欣赏优势;(2)战略项目规划和团队建设;(3)明确的组织/行政指令和指导;(4)护理专业的共同目标。描述拥有博士学位的护士之间合作的文章有限,主要提供较低水平的研究证据和循证实践结果。尽管努力促进拥有终端学位的护士之间的学术合作,但仍需要更多研究来澄清个人角色、提供切实可行的合作策略,并衡量有益于医疗系统、患者结局和护理专业的合作成果。本整合性综述仅涉及对现有文献的回顾。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d15/11707502/e1e4a6321dce/NUR-48-41-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验