Suppr超能文献

蒽环类药物-free和含蒽环类药物的新辅助化疗免疫治疗方案对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效比较

Comparative efficacy of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer.

作者信息

Wei Yuhan, Li Qiao, Mo Hongnan, Qi Yalong, Ge Hewei, Sun Xiaoying, Fan Ying, Zhang Pin, Wang Jiayu, Luo Yang, Wang Jing, Ma Fei

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.

Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of HuanXing ChaoYang District, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Transl Oncol. 2025 Jan;51:102171. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102171. Epub 2024 Nov 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The selection of appropriate chemotherapy backbone agents in combination with neoadjuvant immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unclear. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing regimens coupled with neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

METHOD

This retrospective study included 87 patients with TBNC who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with various chemotherapy regimens at three research centers from November 2020 to November 2023. The primary objective was pathological complete response (pCR), while secondary objectives included overall response rates, event-free survival (EFS), and the incidence of adverse events. A subgroup analysis was performed to delineate patients who may substantially benefit from distinct therapeutic strategies.

RESULTS

Coupled with immunotherapy, anthracycline-free regimens achieved comparable pCR rates (55.1 % vs. 51.4 %; Odds ratio, 1.16; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.49-2.74; p = 0.73) and EFS (Hazard ratio, 0.66; 95 % CI, 0.18-2.45; p = 0.53) to anthracycline-containing regimens. According to subgroup analyses, the tumor stage (p = 0.017) and lymph node stage (p = 0.011) exhibit contradictory predictive power for the pCR rate of anthracycline-free regimens when compared with that of anthracycline-containing regimens. Specifically, anthracycline-free regimens yielded significantly higher pCR rates in patients without lymph node metastasis than anthracycline-containing regimens (p = 0.021). Pooled analyses further confirmed the results of both total and subgroup analyses. Most adverse events were grades 1-2, and no new adverse reactions were observed.

CONCLUSION

Anthracycline-free neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens could serve as an effective and safe alternative immunotherapy partner for patients with TNBC, particularly in those without lymph node metastasis.

摘要

背景

对于三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者,在新辅助免疫治疗中选择合适的化疗基础药物仍不明确。在此,我们旨在评估不含蒽环类药物和含蒽环类药物方案联合新辅助免疫治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了87例TNBC患者,这些患者于2020年11月至2023年11月在三个研究中心接受了新辅助免疫治疗联合各种化疗方案。主要目标是病理完全缓解(pCR),次要目标包括总缓解率、无事件生存期(EFS)和不良事件发生率。进行亚组分析以确定可能从不同治疗策略中显著获益的患者。

结果

与免疫治疗联合使用时,不含蒽环类药物的方案在pCR率(55.1%对51.4%;优势比,1.16;95%置信区间[CI],0.49 - 2.74;p = 0.73)和EFS(风险比,0.66;95% CI,0.18 - 2.45;p = 0.53)方面与含蒽环类药物的方案相当。根据亚组分析,与含蒽环类药物的方案相比,肿瘤分期(p = 0.017)和淋巴结分期(p = 0.011)对不含蒽环类药物方案的pCR率具有相互矛盾的预测能力。具体而言,在无淋巴结转移的患者中,不含蒽环类药物的方案产生的pCR率显著高于含蒽环类药物的方案(p = 0.021)。汇总分析进一步证实了总体分析和亚组分析的结果。大多数不良事件为1 - 2级,未观察到新的不良反应。

结论

不含蒽环类药物的新辅助化疗方案可作为TNBC患者有效且安全的免疫治疗联合方案,尤其是在无淋巴结转移的患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b619/11567949/1d73c591a588/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验