Suppr超能文献

智力的比较分析。

The comparative analysis of intelligence.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 2020 Dec;146(12):1174-1199. doi: 10.1037/bul0000306. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

Abstract

The study of intelligence in humans has been ongoing for over 100 years, including the underlying structure, predictive validity, related cognitive measures, and source of differences. One of the key findings in intelligence research is the uniform positive correlations among cognitive tasks. This has been replicated with every cognitive test battery in humans. Nevertheless, many other aspects of intelligence research have revealed contradictory lines of evidence. Recently, cognitive test batteries have been developed for animals to examine similarities to humans in cognitive structure. The results are inconsistent, but there is evidence for some similarities. This article reviews the way intelligence and related cognitive abilities are assessed in humans and animals and suggests a different way of devising test batteries for maximizing between-species comparisons. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

人类智力的研究已经持续了 100 多年,包括智力的基础结构、预测效度、相关认知测量以及差异来源。智力研究中的一个关键发现是认知任务之间普遍存在正相关。这在人类的每一个认知测试组合中都得到了验证。然而,智力研究的许多其他方面也揭示了相互矛盾的证据。最近,人们为动物开发了认知测试组合,以研究其认知结构与人类的相似之处。结果并不一致,但有一些相似之处的证据。本文综述了人类和动物的智力及相关认知能力的评估方法,并提出了一种设计测试组合的新方法,以最大限度地提高物种间的比较。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验