Academic Quality Department, QU Health, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Department of Pre-Clinical Affairs, College of Nursing, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 2;24(1):3040. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20402-2.
While there is growing evidence highlighting the prevalence of mental health concerns among university faculty, few studies have examined mental health interventions in this population. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to collect and critically appraise the available evidence about the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve the mental health of faculty.
A systematic search was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL to identify relevant studies published in English language from January 1st, 2000 until October 1st, 2023. The search focused on studies done on academic faculty to describe interventions or support programs aimed at improving mental health outcomes, with comparison of mental health data before and after the intervention and an improvement in mental health as study outcome. A random effect meta-analysis method was used to estimate the effectiveness of interventions on faculty mental health.
Ten publications with 891 participants from 2,217 retrieved records were included. The random effect model showed substantial heterogeneity (I = 84.8%, 95% CI: 73.8 - 91.2%, p < 0.001). The pooled SMD was - 1.41 (95% CI: -2.81-0.004) showing a large effect, and it significantly favors the use of intervention for reducing mental health issues among faculty members. The effect size estimates for all included studies ranged from small to large, showing the positive effect of intervention on faculty mental health. Multimodal inference analysis showed that, of the many studied factors for faculty mental health, the region was the most important predictor of intervention effectiveness. However, when the significance of quantitative moderators was tested using meta-regression, age (p = 0.9491) and duration of intervention (p = 0.1284) were not statistically significant.
Interventions aimed at enhancing the mental health of university faculty were overall significant; however, individual studies showed heterogeneous results. Making efforts to enhance the mental health of faculty is crucial and has been proven effective; nevertheless, the existing evidence necessitates further research in this area. For interventions to be effective, it is imperative to tailor them to the specific environment and to the unique characteristics of faculty members.
CRD42023490388.
尽管越来越多的证据表明大学教师群体中存在心理健康问题,但很少有研究关注这一人群的心理健康干预措施。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是收集和批判性评估现有证据,了解旨在改善教师心理健康的干预措施的效果。
通过搜索 PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science 和 CINAHL,检索 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 1 日期间发表的英文文献,以确定相关研究。研究重点是针对学术教师的干预措施或支持计划,以描述旨在改善心理健康结果的干预措施,比较干预前后的心理健康数据,并将心理健康改善作为研究结果。使用随机效应荟萃分析方法来估计干预措施对教师心理健康的有效性。
从 2217 条检索记录中,有 10 篇文献和 891 名参与者被纳入。随机效应模型显示存在显著的异质性(I=84.8%,95%CI:73.8-91.2%,p<0.001)。合并的 SMD 为-1.41(95%CI:-2.81-0.004),表明存在较大的效应,并且显著有利于干预措施的使用,以减少教师的心理健康问题。所有纳入研究的效应量估计值从小到大,表明干预措施对教师心理健康有积极影响。多模态推理分析表明,在许多研究教师心理健康的因素中,区域是干预效果的最重要预测因素。然而,当使用元回归测试定量调节因素的显著性时,年龄(p=0.9491)和干预持续时间(p=0.1284)没有统计学意义。
旨在提高大学教师心理健康的干预措施总体上是有效的;然而,个别研究结果存在异质性。努力提高教师的心理健康水平至关重要,并且已经被证明是有效的;然而,现有证据需要在这一领域进行进一步的研究。为了使干预措施有效,必须根据具体环境和教师的独特特征对其进行调整。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023490388。