Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Department of Biochemistry and Diet Therapy, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 3;14(1):26546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78197-6.
Background Despite the beneficial effects of a plant-based diet on colorectal cancer (CRC), no study has yet investigated the relationship between a Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) and CRC in the Iranian population. Therefore, the present case-control study aimed to assess the relationship between this index and CRC. Methods The current research was conducted on 71 patients with CRC (case group) and 142 (control group) admitted to hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The PHDI (0-150 points) was calculated based on a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression was applied to evaluate the association between CRC and PHDI and its sub-scores. Results After adjusting for the role of potential confounders, lower odds of CRC were observed in the second tertile of the total ratio score (odds ratio (OR) = 0.334; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.127-0.878, P = 0.026) and the last tertile of PHDI (OR = 0.407; 95% CI: 0.183-0.907, P = 0.028), total adequacy score (OR = 0.261; 95% CI: 0.110-0.622, P = 0.002), and total moderation score (OR = 0.380; 95% CI: 0.162-0.891, P = 0.026) in comparison to the first tertile of each index. Conclusions The current study's findings indicated a reverse relationship between PHDI, total adequacy, moderation, and ratio scores with the CRC odds. However, it is suggested that more research be performed in this field in the future to confirm the results of this study.
尽管植物性饮食对结直肠癌(CRC)有有益影响,但尚无研究调查行星健康饮食指数(PHDI)与伊朗人群 CRC 之间的关系。因此,本病例对照研究旨在评估该指数与 CRC 之间的关系。
本研究对 71 例 CRC 患者(病例组)和 142 例(对照组)在伊朗德黑兰医院入院患者进行了研究。根据半定量食物频率问卷计算 PHDI(0-150 分)。应用条件逻辑回归评估 CRC 与 PHDI 及其亚评分之间的关系。
在调整了潜在混杂因素的作用后,总比值评分的第二 tertile 中 CRC 的发生几率较低(比值比(OR)=0.334;95%置信区间(CI):0.127-0.878,P=0.026)和 PHDI 的最后 tertile(OR=0.407;95%CI:0.183-0.907,P=0.028),总适宜性评分(OR=0.261;95%CI:0.110-0.622,P=0.002)和总适度评分(OR=0.380;95%CI:0.162-0.891,P=0.026)与每个指数的第一 tertile 相比。
本研究的结果表明,PHDI、总适宜性、适度性和比值评分与 CRC 发生几率之间存在反向关系。但是,建议在未来在该领域进行更多的研究以证实本研究的结果。